Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: i s thakur · Page 1 of about 47 results (0.183 seconds)

Sep 10 1996

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Irphan Khudada Bardi and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-10-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 149, 302 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 161 and 378; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 8 and 59

Reported in : 1997(1)BomCR584

Advocate for Appellant : I.S. Thakur, A.P.P.

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. A perverse judgment of acquittal dated 29th April 1982 passed by the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No. 221 of 1980 acquitting the respondents for offences punishable under section. 302...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 1998

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Gulam Rasool Dawood Malvi and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-23-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 307 and 326

Reported in : 1998(5)BomCR384

Advocate for Appellant : I.S. Thakur, A.P.P.

ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith with consent of the learned Counsel for respondents Nos. 1, 3, and 4. Learned Counsel for respondent No. 2 is absent. Counsel for the respondents waive service.2. By...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2000

Karim Abdul Rehman Shaikh Vs. Shehnaz Karim Shaikh and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-11-2000

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules, 1960 - Rule 7; Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7; Wakf Act, 1954 - Sections 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 7 and 125 to 128; Family Courts Act, 1984 -Sections 7, 8 and 20; Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Rules, 1986 - Rule 4

Reported in : 2000(4)ALLMR258; 2000(5)BomCR758; 2000CriLJ3560; II(2000)DMC634

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Mulla and ;A.R. Shaikh, Advs.;H.A. Solkar, ;M.H. Solkar for ;All India Milli Council;I.S. Thakur for State;Jametul Ulma (Maharashtra) as Intervener;Y.H. Muchala, ;N.D. Bhatkar, ;B.P. Pandya and ;

ORDERSmt. Ranjana Desai, J.1. In this reference we are called upon to decide certain issues, which are very vital to Muslim women. The learned Single Judge of this Court, Justice Bhairavia came to a conclusion that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Dec 11 1995

R.H. Khatri Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-11-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 437, 438 and 439

Reported in : 1996CriLJ808; 1996(2)MhLj680

Advocate for Appellant : A.P. Mundargi, Adv.

ORDER1. I have heard Mr. A. P. Mundargi for the applicant and Mr. I. S. Thakur learned APP for the State. I have also perused the order dt. 8-12-95 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2001

Mrs. Anita W/O Suresh Atmaram Ambre Vs. the State of Maharashtra and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-28-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981; Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act (Amendment) 1996 - Sections 3 (1); Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 226; Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 114, 323, 452, 504 and 506

Reported in : 2001ALLMR(Cri)658; 2001BomCR(Cri)854; 2001CriLJ2665

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ajit R. Pitale, Adv.

Dr. Pratibha Upasani, J. 1. Though this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who styles herself as the wife of the detenu Suresh Atmaram Ambre, has impugned the detention...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2001

Shri Bapurao Shankar Chavan Vs. Shri M.N. Singh, Commissioner of Polic ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-07-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 3(1); Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons (Amendment) Act, 1996 ;Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 26(1) and 447; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 30

Reported in : (2001)2BOMLR1013

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. U.N. Tripathi, Adv.

ORDERVishnu Sahai, J. 1. Through this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner who describes himself as friend of the detenu Kashinath Namdeo Naravade has impugned the detention order dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 1999

Rajesh @ Raju Vasant Dali and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-29-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 61, 147, 149, 302 and 323; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 9, 45, 59 and 148; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 235, 313 and 378(1)

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR656; (1999)2BOMLR849

Advocate for Appellant : N.N. Gawankar, Adv.

ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Since these connected Criminal Appeals arise out of same set of facts and a common impugned judgement, we are disposing them off by one judgment.2. Through these appeals, the appellants challenge the judgment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 1999

Anand Narayan Mallav Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-24-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 84, 300, 302, 323 and 324; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 45, 59 and 61; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 61, 154, 161, 165, 235 and 313

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR612; 1999BomCR(Cri)612; 1999(2)MhLj839

Advocate for Appellant : Shekhar Ingawale holding, for ;Harshad V. Nimbalkar & ;Mrs. Pratibha R. Ghorpade, Adv.

ORDERVishnu Sahai, J. 1. Through this appeal the appellant challenges the judgment and order dated 3rd March, 1995, passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, in Sessions Case No. 225 of 1994, convicting and sentencing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 1999

Mohd. Arshad Mohd. Tahir Shaikh Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-06-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 307; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 8, 9, 45, 59 and 61; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161 and 313

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR635; 1999(1)MhLj317

Advocate for Appellant : Shirish Gupte and ;S.R. Pasbola, Advs.

ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. The appellant aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 29th September, 1995 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No. 845 of 1991, convicting and sentencing him to undergo...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 2002

Pyarelal Ramkishore Prajapati Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-20-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 204 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 406 and 420

Reported in : 2003BomCR(Cri)103; 2002CriLJ3611; 2002(4)MhLj293

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Marwadi, Adv.

A.B. Palkar, J. 1. All these three petitions have been filed by the accused in C. R. No. 44 of 1995 in respect of which Criminal Case No. 69/P of 2000 and Case No. 429 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
Next ›
Last »

Advanced Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.