Advanced Search Results

Shiv Kumar Ahirwar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. I. Hussain

12.09.2012. Shri I. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Panel Lawyer, for the State, on advance notice. Petitioner seeks regularization in service on the post of Date Entry Operator which was sanctioned...

Saidur Rahman Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Choudhury, R. Mazumdar and I. Hussain, Advs.

Amitava Roy, J. 1. The petitioner before this Court, has assailed the order dated 4.11.1995 passed by the Deputy Director of Madrassa Education, Assam, discharging him from service. At the relevant time the petitioner was holding...

Mohd. Shafi Pandit Vs. Mohd. Yousuf Magray and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Jammu and Kashmir Contempt of Court Act, 1997 - Section 19

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ313

Advocate for Appellant : H.I. Hussain, Adv.

Syed Bashir-Ud-din, J. 1. On 30.12.2002, in Contempt proceedings 443/01, Ld. Single Judge, after taking note of alleged release of Rs. 65 lacs by the respondents to meet the liability of the petitioner employees of CONFED,...

Putul Chetri Vs. the State of Assam.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Sexual Connection - Section 375 IPC

Advocate for Appellant : MR. AS CHOUDHURY; MR. I. HUSSAIN; MR. R. MAJUMDAR; MR. R. ALI, Advs.

1)This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 13/8/2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc), Kokrajhar in Sessions Case No. 2/2001 convicting the accused u/s 376 IPC and sentencing him to undergo...

Nissar HussaIn and ors. Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Property

Acts : Jammu and Kashmir Land Acquisition Act, Svt. 1990 - Sections 18 and 31; ;Jammu and Kashmir Agrarian Reforms Act - Sections 4 and 8(4)

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ228

Advocate for Appellant : H.I. Hussain, Adv.

Permod Kohil, J.1. Petitioners claim to be recorded owners of land situated at Muza Barrey Nambal, Srinagar falling under survey numbers 639, 640, 641, 642, 1805/630, 1808/632, 634, 638, 643, 642, 632, 637, 1809/635, 1810/635, 647,...

Rezia Khatun, Assam Vs. The Union of India, Represented by the Ministr ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.I. Hussain

1. The petitioner, who has been declared to be a foreigner (illegal Bangladeshi migrant) by the Foreigners Tribunal, Goalpara, Assam, vide order dated 05.10.2013 in F.T Case No. 2941/G/10 (ERO Case No. 242 53/38) (State of...

MoinuddIn Ahmed and ors. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Acts : Assam Public Service Commission (Limitation and Functions) Regulations, 1951 - Regulation 3

Advocate for Appellant : I. Hussain, Adv.

Ranjan Gogoi, J.1. Though 31 petitioners had instituted the present case, to begin with, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only two petitioners, i.e., Petitioner No. 13 Shri Dilip Kumar Sarmah and Petitioner No....

Sahil Rahman Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Choudhury, R. Mazumdar, I Hussain and A. Maleque, Advs.

Ranjan Gogol, J. 1. Heard Mr. A.S. Choudhury, learned counsel assisted by Mr. I. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. G. Deka, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam. 2. The writ petitioner, who was at the...

Ved Parkash vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

$~26 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA7122016 Date of Decision:27. 04.2017 VED PARKASH ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sudhanshu Tomar, Advocate versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Gautam...

Karaniya Vs. State of Rajasthan and Vice Versa

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1987WLN(UC)478

Shyam Sunder Byas, J.1. As the appeals are directed against one and the same judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judged), Jodhpur dated September 29, 1976, they were heard together and are decided by a common...