Advanced Search Results

Ramesh Chander JaIn Vs. Manohar Lal Jain

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 73(1)

Reported in : ILR1975Delhi713

Advocate for Appellant : I.C. Jain,; N.R. Suri,; Yogesh Sharma and;

S.S. Chadha, J. (1) These four excution petitions, namely. Ex. No. 53 of 1972 (Ramesh Chander Jain v. Manohar Lal Jain) Ex. No. 54 of 1972 {Smt. Manju Jain v. Manohar Lal Jain) Ext. No. 63...

Purshottam Dass Gupta (Shri) Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999IVAD(Delhi)645; 80(1999)DLT230

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. U.N. Bachawat, Sr.Adv.,; Mr. Raj Kishore Gupta,; Mr. An

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioner has filed the writ petition challenging the adverse remarks made by the High Court for the years 1994 and 1995 at one go and seeking promotion from the date on which...

ishwar Chand JaIn Vs. High Court of Punjab Anfd Haryana and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab Superior Judicial Service Rules, 1963; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 148, 149, 324, 325, 332, 353, 363 and 366; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : AIR1988SC1395; JT1988(2)SC473; 1988LabIC1651; 1988(1)SCALE1188; (1988)3SCC370; [1988]Supp1SCR396; 1988(2)LC381(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : P.P. Rao,; K.K. Patel,; P.S. Pradhan and;

1. Special Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dated 9.12.1986 dismissing the appellant's writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the...

N.S. Bohra Vs. Suresh Kumar Hawa and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Acts : Rajasthan Civil Services (Absorption of Surplus Personnel) Rules, 1969 - Rules 3, 3(2), 5, 7, 7(1), (3), (4), (5), 11, 11(5), (6), 15 and 15(1); Limitation Act - Sections 5 and 14; Rajasthan Mines and Geological Service Rules, 1960 - Rule 27

Reported in : 2000(3)WLC635

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Joshi and; Namita Parihar, Advs.

Madan, J.(1) This special appeal arises out of two judgments cum orders dated 8.1,96 and 10.4.97 passed by the learned Single Judge. First one was passed allowing S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.818/79 of Suresh Kumar Hawa...

High Court of Punjab and Haryana Through R.G. Vs. Ishwar Chand JaIn an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Relevant Rules - Rule 10; Punjab Civil Services Rules - Rule 3.26; Haryana Civil Services(Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1970; Constitution of India - Articles 235 and 311

Reported in : AIR1999SC1677; JT1999(3)SC266; 1999(3)SCALE26; (1999)4SCC579; [1999]2SCR834; 1999(2)LC847(SC); (1999)2UPLBEC1097

Advocate for Appellant : Raju Ramachandran,; Ejaz Maqbool,; B.K. Misra and;

ORDERD.P. Wadhwa, J.1. Leave granted.2. Delay condoned in S.L.P. (C) No. 1830 of 1999.3. High Court of Punjab and Haryana is aggrieved by the judgment dated May 22, 1998 of a Division Bench of its own...

B. Tex Corporation Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1993)46ITD61(Mum.)

1. These four appeals by the assessee are directed against the separate but similar orders of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) of even date, i.e., August 28, 1989, in relation to the assessment years 1979-80...

Radhika Agarwal versus Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : [2025]2S.C.R.1331

[2025] 2 S.C.R. 1331 : 2025 INSC 272Radhika Agarwal v. Union of India and Others (Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 336 of 2018) 27 February 2025 [Sanjiv Khanna,* CJI, M.M. Sundresh and Bela M. Trivedi,* JJ.]Issue for...

Amitabh Bachchan Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2005)97TTJ(Mum.)516

1. This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A), Central-VII, Mumbai, dt. 30th July, 2004 for the asst. yr.2001-02. "(I) On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the...

Rajeev Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand and Jharkhand High Court at Ra ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service (Recruitment, Appointment and Condition of Service) Rules, 2001; Jharkhand Service Code, 2001 - Rule 95; Constitution of India - Article 311(2)

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1968; [2007(3)JCR403(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Party-in-Person

M. Karpaga Vinayagam, C.J. 1. Rajeev Kumar, the petitioner herein, who was appointed as Additional District & Sessions Judge as against the temporary post of Presiding Officer of Fast Track Court in the year 2003, was...

The Manager, Hindu Higher Secondary School Vs. the State of Haryana Th ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Haryana Aided Schools (Security of Service) Rules 1947 - Rule 82; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226

Reported in : (1991)99PLR378

Advocate for Appellant : J.L. Gupta, Sr. Adv. and; Nidhi Gupta, Adv.

K.P. Bhandari, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order passed by the Director of School Education, Haryana, Chandigarh, on the appeal of Ram Kumar Sharma, respondent No. 4 in one went position a teacher...