Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: hyam · Page 1 of about 148 results (0.089 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 06 1990

Mah. Gen. Jonathan Reuben Samson Vs. Zillah Solomon and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-06-1990

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 106, 138, 211, 255, 263, 278, 301, 303 and 304; Bombay High Court Original Side Rules - Rules 374 and 375; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Rule 20, Order V

Reported in : AIR1991Bom222; 1991(1)BomCR334

Advocate for Appellant : A.P. Talathi and ;Sunil R.Rawal, Advs.

ORDER1. This petition is for (a) setting aside the order dated 30th November, 1989 disposing with the service of citations and revoking the grant of Letters of Administration issued to respondents Nos. 1 and 2 pursuant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 23 1940

Seth Kishori Lal and Another Vs. Bhawani Shankar and Others

Court : Privy Council

Decided on : May-23-1940

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : C.S. Rewcastle and S. Hyam, for Appellants; Respondents Ex parte. Solicitors for Appellants, Barrow Rogers and Neill; Respondents Ex parte.

SIR GEORGE RANKIN: This appeal is brought by the plaintiffs from a decree of the High Court at Allahabad, dated 24th November 1936. The defendants have not been represented at the hearing of the appeal, but...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 1974

Bangor Punta Operations Vs. Bangor and Aroostook R.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-19-1974

Subject : Land Acquisition

Bangor Punta Operations v. Bangor & Aroostook R. - 417 U.S. 703 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court Bangor Punta Operations v. Bangor & Aroostook R., 417 U.S. 703 (1974) Bangor Punta Operations, Inc. v. Bangor & Aroostook...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 25 1915

J.i.J. Hyam Vs. M.E. Gubbay

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-25-1915

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 32Ind.Cas.53

Lawrence Jenkins, C.J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit for specific performance brought by the plaintiff, who claims to have entered into a concluded contract for the sale to the defendant of immoveable property in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

1877

Lilienthal's Tobacco Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-01-1877

Subject : Land Acquisition

Lilienthal's Tobacco v. United States - 97 U.S. 237 (1877) U.S. Supreme Court Lilienthal's Tobacco v. United States, 97 U.S. 237 (1877) Lilienthal's Tobacco v. United States 97 U.S. 237 ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 1921

Muhammad Hafiz Vs. Mirza Muhammad Zakariya

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-17-1921

Subject : CivilProperty

Reported in : (1922)24BOMLR341

Buckmaster, J.1. In this appeal their Lordships have not had the advantage of hearing counsel for the respondents, but owing to the full and able argument of Mr. Hyam they have been placed in complete possession...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 1960

Ram Sarup and ors. Vs. Shikhar Chand and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-13-1960

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 3(1), 3(2) and 3(3); Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction (Amendment) Act, 1954; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1961All221

Advocate for Appellant : Hari Swarup, Adv.

Mootham, C.J.1. I had the advantage of reading the judgment prepared by Beg, J. but regret that I am unable to agree with the conclusion at which he has arrived,2. The essential facts are not in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 1988

Canara Bank Vs. Gokuldas Shenoy and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-09-1988

Subject : CommercialContract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 139 and 141; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 55

Reported in : [1991]72CompCas298(Ker)

Advocate for Appellant : T.R.G. Warriar and; Sebastian Davis, Advs.

Shamsuddin, J.1. The plaintiff in O. S. No. 10 of 1978 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Kasaragod is the appellant.2. The suit was filed for recovery of money. It is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 1918

Habibar Rahman Chowdhury Vs. Altaf Ali Chowdhury

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-01-1918

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1919Cal17,(1919)ILR46Cal259

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Norton

Sanderson, C.J.1. This is an appeal from the judgment of Greaves J. The plaintiff Habibar Rabhman Chowdhury has been adjudicated insolvent since the institution of the appeal and the Official Assignee, having refused to be joined...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 1918

Syed Habibur Rahaman Chaudhury and anr. Vs. Syed Altaf Ali Chaudhury a ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-01-1918

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 49Ind.Cas.545

Lancelot Sanderson, C.J.1. This is an appeal from the judgment of Greaves, J. The plaintiff Habibur Rahaman Chaudhry has been adjudicated insolvent since the institution of the appeal, and the Official Assignee having refused to be...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial