Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: hirak mitra · Page 1 of about 117 results (0.084 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 25 2004

Bank of Maharashtra Vs. Dilip Kumar Pandit and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-25-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Evidence Act - Section 45

Reported in : 2004(4)CHN589

Advocate for Appellant : Hirak Mitra and ;Soumen Sen, Advs.

Altamas Kabir, J.1. Between 2nd May, 1990 and 8th October, 1991, the writ petitioner/respondent No. 1 worked as a clerk in the Savings Department at the Netaji Subhas Road Branch of the Bank of Maharashtra. On...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 2003

Nabendu Dutta and ors. Vs. Arindam Mukherjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-20-2003

Subject : CompanyCivil

Acts : Comapnies Act, 1956 - Sections 274, 274(1) and 294; ;Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Section 45QA; ;Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000

Reported in : [2004]121CompCas150(Cal),[2004]55SCL146(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : Sudipta Sarkar, Sr. Adv., ;P.C. Sen, ;P.K. Roy, ;Hirak Mitra and ;Joyanta Mitra, Advs.

Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1.In this motion, the petitioner succeeded in obtaining an ad interim order of status quo, passed by this court in a declaratory action for holding that defendants Nos. 1 and 2 have become...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1999

Smt. Smriti Jaiswal and anr. Vs. Romi Jaiswal and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-04-1999

Subject : Civil

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Section 43

Reported in : AIR1999Cal123

Advocate for Appellant : Hirak Mitra, ;Maharaja Sen and ;Deb Dutta Sen, Advs.

M.H.S. Ansari, J.1. The instant appeal is directed against the error of the learned trialJudge dated 30th November, 1998 on an application of the appellants/defendants Nos. 2 and 3 inter alia, praying for revocation of leave...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 17 1990

Middle East Bank Ltd. Vs. Rajendra Singh Sethia

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-17-1990

Subject : CivilBanking

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 11, 13, 44A, 44A(3) and 47 - Order 14, Rule 3 - Order 21, Rule 41;; Companies Act, 1956;; English Bankruptcy Act, 1914 - Sections 7 and 7(2) and 9;; Presidency Towns Insolvency Act - Section 17

Reported in : AIR1991Cal335

Advocate for Appellant : Hirak Mitra and ;S.P. Majumdar, Advs.

ORDER1. This is an application under Order 21, Rule 41 of the Code of Civil Procedure for examination of judgment-debtor Rajendra Singh Sethia as to his property in a proceeding for execution of a foreign decree...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 2008

Oriental Bank of Commerce Vs. Santosh Kumar Agarwal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-15-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Section 6; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 16, 17, 20, 21 and 120

Reported in : AIR2008Cal148,(2008)2CALLT509(HC),2008(3)CHN202

Advocate for Appellant : Hirak Mitra,; Sandip Mukherjee and; Ashim Roychowdhury, Advs.

Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J.1. This appeal has been preferred at the instance of the defendant-Oriental Bank of Commerce from the judgment and decree dated 18th January, 2001 passed in C.S. No. 216 of 1996.2. The claim...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 2004

Ansuman Mullick Vs. Mallika Investment Co. (P.) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-13-2004

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105 and 107

Reported in : AIR2004Cal316

Advocate for Appellant : Hirak Mitra, Sr. Adv., ;Pradip Kumar Dutta, ;Chanchal Kumar Dutta and ;Krishna Mullick, Advs.

ORDERJayanta Kumar Biswas, J.1. This is the plaintiffs application for interim reliefs in his pending suit.2. The plaintiffs case, in a few words, is this. The first, fifth and sixth defendants have no right, title and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 2003

NabIn Agarwal and anr. Etc. Vs. C.E.S.C. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-30-2003

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(51), 43, 172 185 and 185(2);; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 21(2), 172(3)

Reported in : AIR2004Cal227

Advocate for Appellant : Hirak Mitra and ;R.L. Dutta, Advs.

ORDERPranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J.1. All the three writ petitions bearing W.P. No. 1439 of 1999, W.P. No. 320 of 2001 and W.P. No. 2563 of 2001 have been assigned before this Court for final adjudication. All...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 2009

icici Bank Limited Vs. Garodia Vyapar Pratisthan Private Limited

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-10-2009

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 43A, 84, 111A and 155; ;Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988

Reported in : [2009]150CompCas746(Cal),[2010]97SCL325(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : Hirak Mitra and ;Deb Dutta Sen, Advs.

Ashim Kumar Banerjee, J.1. ICICI Bank Limited the appellant above named is a public limited company registered under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said Act of 1956'). Its shares are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2007

Development Consultants Ltd. Vs. Mayank Poddar and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-04-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 12, Rule 6

Reported in : 2007(2)CHN704

Advocate for Appellant : Hirak Mitra, ;Gour Roy Chowdhury and ;Subhrojit Roy, Advs.

Bhaskar Bhattacharya, J.1. This appeal is at the instance of a defendant in a suit for eviction and other consequential relief and is directed against order dated June 5, 2006 passed by a learned Single Judge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2004

Indian Express Newspaper (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of West Bengal a ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-23-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 10; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(1)CHN390,[2006(106)FLR467],(2005)IILLJ333Cal

Advocate for Appellant : Party-in-Person;Hirak Mitra, ;Soumen Sen, ;Pooja Das Chowdhury and ;Vineet Tibrewal, Advs

Altamas Kabir, J.1. These two appeals have been taken up together as they involve common questions of law and fact and the parties are also common.2. Mr. B. G. Sampat, who has appeared in person in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial