Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: hemanta kumar · Page 1 of about 241 results (0.075 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 21 1967

Gotham Construction Co. Vs. Amulya Krishna Ghose and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-21-1967

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9, 100 and 101 - Order 1, Rule 1 - Order 20, Rule 6; ;Calcutta Minicipal Act, 1951 - Sections 437(1), 437(6), 537, 582 and 583; ;Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 54 and 56; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 45; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 113

Reported in : AIR1968Cal91,72CWN717

Advocate for Appellant : Lala Hemanta Kumar, ;Biswajit Ghose and ;Samir Kumar Mukherjee, Advs.

Bijayesh Mukherji, J.1. This is an appeal by the defendant, Gotham Construction Co., a firm, against whom the trial judge, and on appeal, the appellate judge as well, have granted a decree, permanently restraining it 'from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 1968

Mohammed Seraj Vs. Adibar Rahaman Sheikh and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-31-1968

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 17, 21, 31 and 145; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 3, Rule 4 - Order 41, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1968Cal550,72CWN867

Advocate for Appellant : Lala Hemanta Kumar and ;Manick Chandra Banerjee, Advs.

Bijayesh Mukherji, J.1. Is the admission in the plaint of a suit, permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to sue afresh of any effect, in the suit instituted afterwards, in pursuance of the liberty so given?...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 1962

Lal Behari Sasmal Vs. Kanak Kanti Roy

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-16-1962

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53A and 107

Reported in : AIR1962Cal502

Advocate for Appellant : Lala Hemanta Kumar and ;Rebati Nath Sarkar, Advs.

1. This is an appeal by the defendant in a suit for ejectment and recovery of arrears of rent instituted in the Court of the Munsif at Uluberia on January 5, 1955.2. The appellant gets into...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 04 1951

Abinash Chandra Dutta and ors. Vs. Gour Chandra

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-04-1951

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Section 5 - Schedule - Articles 131 and 181; ; Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885 - Sections 26G, 26G(5) and 185; ; Tenancy Law

Reported in : AIR1952Cal76,55CWN489

Advocate for Appellant : Hemanta Kumar, Adv.

K.C. Chunder, J.1. This appeal is by a mortgagor claiming relief under Section 26G(5), Bengal Tenancy Act.2. The facts are simple. A usufructuary mortgage was executed in 1902. The mortgagees remained in possession. On 19-6-1946, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 1960

Gopiram Onkarmall Vs. Sewantilal Punam Chand

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-05-1960

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 103

Reported in : AIR1960Cal580,65CWN483

Advocate for Appellant : Lala Hemanta Kumar and ;Sudhir Kumar Dutt, Advs.

Renupada Mukherjee, J.1. The defendant of the trial court which is a firmof the name and style of Gopiram Onkarmal, is appellant in this appeal. The suit out of which thisappeal hag arisen was instituted in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 1958

Gosta Behari Ghose Vs. Panchanon Jeley and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-07-1958

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Law; ;Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885 - Schedule - Article 1

Reported in : AIR1959Cal601

Advocate for Appellant : Lala Hemanta Kumar and ;Bimal Kumar Das, Advs.

Renupada Mukherjee, J. 1. This appeal raises an interesting question of law, namely, whether an underraiyat who holds his land under a lease for a limited term and against whom a suit for ejectment brought by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 1953

Uma Kanta Banerjee Vs. Renwick and Co. Ltd., Decree-holder and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-30-1953

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 51 - Order 20, Rule 10 - Order 21, Rules 21 and 31

Reported in : AIR1953Cal717,58CWN683

Advocate for Appellant : Lala Hemanta Kumar and ;Sudhir Kr. Dutt, Advs.

G.N. Das J. 1. This is an appeal by the judgment-debtor and is directed against an order of Mr. M.N. Mukherji, learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Birbhum, dated 18-2-1952.2. The facts may be shortly put as follows:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 1963

Abharan Chandra Saha Vs. Sanat Kumar Sen

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-27-1963

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Tenancy Law; ;West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1954 - Sections 6, 6(2) and 59; ;West Bengal Estates Acquisition Rules, 1954 - Rule 4; ;Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885 - Section 26F; ;West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953

Reported in : AIR1964Cal460,68CWN574

Advocate for Appellant : Lala Hemanta Kumar and ;Mohal Lal De, Advs.

Banerjee, J.1. The petitioner says Chat one Radha Ranjan Saha and be himself were co-sharer tenants in respect at C. S. Plot No 503 of Khatian No. 90. in Mouza Kumardanga, District Birbhum. On the death...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 1951

Abhimanyu Adak Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-20-1951

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) (Amendment) Act, 1950; ; Constitution of India - Article 372; ; Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Section 3, 3(1) and 3(2); ; Bengal Foodgrains Control (Disposal and Acquisition) Order, 1947

Reported in : AIR1952Cal118,55CWN693

Advocate for Appellant : Hemanta Kumar Bose and ; Paramananda Dutt, Advs.

ORDERBose, J.1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution for a rule to show cause why a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or a direction should not issue calling upon the Respondents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2012

Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs. Smt. Kusum Patro

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on : Mar-19-2012

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K. M. Tripathy

ANUPAM DASGUPTA This revision petition challenges the order dated 25.11.2010 of the Odisha State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Cuttack (in short, the State Commission). By this order, the State Commission dismissed the appeal of the Life...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial