Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: hemalatha · Page 1 of about 1,417 results (0.272 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 15 2004

D. Parthasarathy Vs. Vinayaprabha

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-15-2004

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1) and 23(1); Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 10

Reported in : AIR2004Kant348; I(2005)DMC372

Advocate for Appellant : Hemalatha Mahishi, Adv.

Ram Mohan Reddy, J. 1. The petitioner- husband, being aggrieved by the dismissal of his petition under Section 13(1-A)(11) and under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short the 'Act') by the Judgment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 2008

Associated Managements of Primary and Secondary Schools in Karnataka V ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-02-2008

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka High Court Act, 1964 - Sections 3, 4(27), 7, 7(1), 7(C), 9 and 145; Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960; Gujarat University Act, 1949; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956; Karnataka Education Act, 1983; Karnataka Official Languages Act, 1963 - Sections 2; Primary Schools Education Code - Rule 12(2); Grant-in-Code - Rule 12, 12(1) and 12(2); Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2) 19(6), 21, 21A, 25, 26, 26(1), 26(2), 26(3), 27, 29, 29(1), 29(2), 30, 30(1), 31, 32, 38(2), 39, 41, 42, 45, 46, 51A, 141, 162, 226, 343, 344, 345, 347, 348 and 350A; Constitution of India (VII Amendment) Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR2008NOC2790(FB); ILR2008(3)KAR2895; 2008(4)KarLJ593; 2008(4)KLJ593; 2008(5)AIRKarR261; AIR2008NOC2790(FB)

Advocate for Appellant : Basavaraj, Adv. for Vijayashankar Associates, ;U.L. Bhat, Sr. Adv., ;P.S. Dinesh Kumar, ;Shantesh Gureddi, ;M.C. Narasimhan, ;H. Neelakanta Rao, ;A.G. Holla, Advs., ;Shetty and Hegde Associates, ;F.V.

ORDERN. Kumar, J.1. The destiny of India is now being shaped in her classrooms. In a world based on science and technology it is education that determines the level of prosperity, welfare and security of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 2002

Mukunda Vs. Dr. K. Radhakrishna Pai

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-18-2002

Subject : TenancyLimitation

Acts : Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 - Sections 21(1); Karnataka Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 27(2), 46(2) and 70(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : 2002(3)KarLJ573

Advocate for Appellant : R.U. Goulay, Adv. for ;C.R. Goulay, Adv.

ORDERM.F. Saldanha, J.1. I have heard the learned Advocates on both sides. These two petitions are directed against the common order passed by the revisional Court whereby the respondent's revision was allowed and the petitioner's revision...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 13 2004

Ankola Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd., by Its General Manager and ors. V ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-13-2004

Subject : BankingTrusts and Societies

Acts : Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Sections 129(2)(Y); Karnataka Co-operative Societies Rules, 1960 - Rule 30, 30(1) and 30(1A); Karnataka Civil Service Rules, 1959 - Rule 441

Reported in : 2005(2)KarLJ251

Advocate for Appellant : K.M. Nataraj, ;Hemalatha Mahishi, ;G. Balakrishna Shastry, ;H.K. Basavaraj, ;S.R. Hegde Hudlamane, ;O. Shivaram Bhat, ;N. Sriram Reddy, ;K.M. Nataraj, ;S.A. Kalagi, Advs. and ;Jayakumar S. Patil and A

ORDERV. Gopala Gowda, J.1. In all these Writ Petitions filed by the Co-operative Banks, Societies or institutions the facts are common or similar and the issue involved is the same. Hence, they arc all heard together...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 06 2007

Karthik Electric Controls Vs. Commercial Tax Officer

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-06-2007

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 3(2), 3(3), 8(1), 10, 10(3), 12(3), 16(1), 23 and 45(2); Central Sales Tax Act; ;Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976 - Article 226; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules - Rule 12A

Reported in : (2008)15VST450(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : R. Hemalatha, Adv.

A.P. Shah, C.J.1. Admit. The learned Special Government Pleader (Taxes) waives service. By consent, the appeal is taken up for disposal.2. The appellant/firm is engaged in the manufacture of control panels and is an assessee on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2004

P. Bikshapathi Vs. State of A.P. Represented by Public Prosecutor

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-07-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 306 and 498A

Reported in : II(2005)DMC617

Advocate for Appellant : Hemalatha, Counsel by Legal Aid

P.S. Narayana, J.1. The quarrel between a drunkard husband and his wife resulted in the death of the wife consequent upon which the husband was charged with the offences under Sections 306 and 498-A I.P.C. and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2006

Maruthi Handling Equipments Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-10-2006

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 3(2), 3(3), 8(1), 10, 23 and 45(2); Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rule - Rule 12A

Reported in : (2007)7VST261(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : R. Hemalatha, Adv.

A.P. Shah, C.J.1. This writ appeal is filed against the order of the learned single Judge dated July 13, 2006 in M. P. No. 2 of 2006 in W. P. No. 22311 of 2006 imposing certain...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2007

R.P. Motors Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-13-2007

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles into Local Areas Act, 1990 - Sections 2, 8, 8(3), 8(4), 8(5), 15(1) and 15(2); Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956

Reported in : (2008)15VST442(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : R. Hemalatha, Adv.

ORDERS. Manikumar, J.1. Writ petition is for a certiorari to quash the order of the respondent dated March 30, 2007 as illegal and contrary to the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Motor...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 2011

K.Santhanalakshmi Vs. Saravanan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-15-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Orders 39, 7 Rules 1, 2, 11

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.Subramaniam; Mrs. S.Hemalatha, Advs.

O R D E R1. The fourth defendant in O.S.No.140 of 2009 on the file of the Sub Court, Ranipet, who is also the fourth respondent in I.A.No.315 of 2009, has filed the above Civil Revision...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 1985

Sakrappa Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-15-1985

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 7, 7(2), 15(6), 38, 44, 44(1), 45, 45(1), 45(2), 45(3), 48A, 48A(1), 48A(5), 48A(8), 57, 77, 112, 112B, 133 and 137

Reported in : ILR1985KAR1833

Advocate for Appellant : M.R. Naik, Shantanu Patil for ;Shivraj Patil, ;S.R. Ramanathan, ;N.Y. Hanumanthappa and ;Hemalatha Mahishi, Advs. for Parties and ;S.R. Nayak, P. Ganpathy Bhat, T.R. Subbanna, F.V. Patil, Jayakumar S.

ORDERBopanna, J.1. The points that arise for consideration in these Petitions are of far reaching consequences on the implementation of theKarnataka and Reforms Act, 1961 (in short the Act) and therefore by my order dated 15-1-1985...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial