Advanced Search Results

Kahnu Vs. Hirda Ram Etc.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1953 - Sections 11 and 104; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 22, Rule 4

Reported in : 5(1969)DLT183

Advocate for Appellant : Hem Chand,; Ramesh Chand,; M.V. Sharma and;

T.V.R. Tatachari, J. (1) This Second Appeal was filed against the judgment and order of the learned District Judge, Mandi and Chamba Districts, at Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, dated 31st October, 1966, in Civil Miscellaneons Appeal No....

Sh. Gyan Chand and ors. Vs. Sh. Ram Chander

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Hem Chand Vashist

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.69/2014 % SH. GYAN CHAND & ORS. Through:19. h March, 2014 ......Appellants Mr. Hem Chand Vashist, Adv. VERSUS SH. RAM CHANDER ...... Respondent Through:...

Ravi vs the State of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Hem Chand Vashisht, Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Mr. Jitendra Kumar

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 17.02.2026+ BAIL APPLN. 753/2025 RAVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Hem Chand Vashisht, AdvocateversusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP...

Collector Vs. Upinder Kumar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18(3)

Reported in : 4(1968)DLT688

Advocate for Appellant : S. Malhtora and; Hem Chand, Advs

I.D. Dua, J.(1) The Collector, Land Acquisition. Mandi, has preferred this appeal from the award of the learned Additional District Judge, Himachal Pradesh, at Mandi, dated 31st May, 1966 and the learned counsel turn the appellant...

Baij Nath Vs. Bhagat Singh and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : 43(1991)DLT325; 1991(20)DRJ322; 1991RLR300

Advocate for Appellant : Ravinder Sethi,; Nandini Sahni,; I.S. Mathur,;

Sunanda Bhandare, J.(1) This second appeal under Section 39 of the unamended Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is filed by the appellant-tenant against the order of the Rent Control Tribunal...

Jai Kumar Vs. Janki Devi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : 1985(8)DRJ269

Advocate for Appellant : Ravinder Sethi, Adv

N.N. Goswamy, J.(1) This second appeal by the tenant is directed against, the order dated 5-3-1974 passed by the Rent Control Tribunal whereby the eviction Order passed against the appellant by the Addl. Rent Controller was...

SuraIn Singh Vs. Tuisi Ram Araun

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : 1996(36)DRJ551

Advocate for Appellant : B.J. Nayyar,; R.C. Sharma,; V.B. Andley and;

Arun Kumar, J. (1) This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Rent Control Tribunal passing an eviction order against the appellant under clause (a) of the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 14 of...

Ajija Banu Vs. Vadivambal and Another

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the Judgement and Decree dated 28.10.2002 passed in A.S.No.113 of 2001, on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Madurai confirming...

Ram Murti Vs. Bhola Nath and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1), 14(2), 15(1), 15(6) and 15(7)

Reported in : AIR1984SC1392; 1984(1)SCALE727; (1984)3SCC111; 1984(16)LC1094(SC)

A.P. Sen, J.1. This appeal by special leave by the appellant Ram Murti is directed against the judgment of the Delhi High Court dated August 10, 1982 dismissing his second appeal under Section 39 and upholding...

FazlhusseIn Sharafally Vs. Mahomedally Abdulally Sassoor

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Reported in : AIR1943Bom366; (1943)45BOMLR614

John Beaumont, C.J.1. This is an appeal from a decision of Mr. Justice Blackwell, and it raises interesting questions of law relating to charitable trusts.2. The parties are all Mahomedans of the Shia sect, and on...