Advanced Search Results

Mohammad Israil and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Defence of India Act, 1962 - Section 3(1) and 3(2); ;Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 133V; ;Enemy Property Act, 1968 - Sections 7 and 8; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 116; ;Constitution of India - Articel 226

Reported in : AIR1976Cal189,80CWN193

Advocate for Appellant : Hassan Imam, Adv.

ORDERSalil K. Roy Chowdhury, J. 1. This is a writ petition challenging a notice dated the 24th of October, 1973 and two letters dated the 29th of October, 1973 issued by the respondent No. 3, Deputy...

Syed Hassan Francis Imam Vs. the Muzaffarpur Properties Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Patna

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : Waqf Act, 1954 - Sections 1(3), 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 57; Mussalman Waqf Validating Act, 1913 - Sections 3; Mussalman Waqf Act, 1923; Mussalman Waqf Validating Act, 1930; Bihar Waqfs Act, 1947; Waqf (Bihar Amendment) Act, 1974 - Sections 1(2); Waqf Act, 1995 - Sections 112; wakf (Amendment) Act, 1984; Mohammendan Law

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. and Ravi Shankar Dwivedi, Adv.

S.N. Hussain, J.1. All the aforesaid three civil revisions were heard together and are being decided by this common order as they arise out of the same suit bearing Title Suit No. 262 of 1991 and...

Keolapati and Another Vs. Raja Amar Krishna NaraIn Singh and Another

Court : Privy Council

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : D.N. Pritt, Sir Sultan Ahmad and L.S. Misra, for Appellants ; Sir Thomas Strangman, W. Wallach and Peary Lal Banerji, and Siraj Husain, for Respondents 1, and 2, respectively. Solicitors for Appellants, Hy. S.L. Polak and Co., Solicitors for Respondents,

Sir George Rankin: Their Lordships have already intimated in their opinion that the questions for decision upon this appeal are concluded by concurrent findings of fact on the part of the Courts in India. They have...

Sakib Hassan Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.C. Sinha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 4003 of 2009 ----------- Sakib Hassan, Son of Hassan Imam, Resident of Friends Colony Pugmil, P.O. Noora, P.S. Sadar, District-Hazaribagh. …..Petitioner Versus 1. The State of...

Rajendra Prasad and Ors Vs. Human Resources Department

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P (S) No. 4195 of 2015 With I.A No.4148 of 2016 1. Rajendra Prasad 2. Ranjit Kumar Mandal 3. Md. Neyaz Ahamad 4. Shanti Kumari 5.Alok Das Gupta...

Gani Mian and anr. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

R.N. Sahay, J.1. The appellants who are father and son have been convicted under Section 395, I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years by 2nd the Addl. Sessions Judge, West Champaran, in S....

Faiz Murtaza Ali Vs. Syed Askari Hadi Ali Augustine Imam and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : AIR2009Jhar128

ORDER1. This petition for review is directed against the order dated 2-4-2008 passed in L.P.A. No. 33 of 2008 as also the order passed by the learned single Judge on 4-1-2008 in Testamentary Case No. l...

Rajendra Narayan Singh Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 18Ind.Cas.149

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Roy

Carnduff, J.1. Section 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1898 provides that, whenever a Sub-Divisional Magistrate receives information that a person within the local limits of his jurisdiction is in the habit of committing...

Ram Prosad Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 17Ind.Cas.993

Carnduff, J.1. The petitioner Ram Prosad charged one Padam Kunjra with assault and (sic). The charge of theft was declared to (sic) and the petitioner was prosecuted (sic) of it under Section 211 of the Penal...

Hasan Imam, and ors. Vs. State of Bihar, and anr.

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 482, 146(i), 145

Advocate for Appellant : Md. Faiz Ahmad; MR. D.P. CHAUDHARY, Advs.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for the complainant. Perused supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioners.2. This is an application under Section 482 of...