Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: harish salve · Page 1 of about 425 results (0.123 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 02 1991

Mangalore Chemicals and Fertilisers Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-02-1991

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 - Sections 5(2); Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 8A

Reported in : AIR1992SC152; 1993LC23(SC); 1991(55)ELT437(SC); JT1992(3)SC482; 1991(2)SCALE662; 1992Supp(1)SCC21; [1991]3SCR336; [1991]83STC234(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Harish Salve,; K.P. Kumar,; Ravinder Narain,;

1. By this petition, Messrs Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilisers Limited, a registered dealer under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, ('Act') seeks special leave to appeal to this Court from the judgment and order dated 14th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2005

Zee Telefilms Limited Represented by Its Executive Vice President-lega ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-21-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(2)CTC525; (2005)2MLJ281

Advocate for Appellant : Harish N. Salve and ;P.S. Raman, Sr. Advs., ;Maninder Singh and ;Pratibha Singh, Advs. for ;P.R. Raman, Adv.

ORDERK.P. Sivasubramaniam, J.1. The petitioner, Zee Telefilms Limited, prays for a Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the first respondent in its communication dated 21.9.2004 cancelling the tender process dated 7.8.2004 and to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 1997

Harshad J. Shah and Another Vs. L.i.C. of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-04-1997

Subject : Contract

Acts : Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 48(2); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 186, 187, 188 and 237; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 14; Life Insurance Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1981

Reported in : AIR1997SC2459; [1997]89CompCas109(SC); (1997)2GLR1577; JT1997(4)SC505; RLW1997(2)SC189; 1997(3)SCALE423; (1997)5SCC64; [1997]3SCR617

Advocate for Appellant : Naresh S. Mathur and Gopal Singh, Advs

ORDERS.C. Agrawal, J.1. The question that falls for consideration in these appeals by special leave is whether payment of premium in respect of a life insurance policy by the insured to the general agent of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 17 2002

Bank of India and ors. Vs. O.P. Swaranakar Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-17-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : State Bank of India Act, 1955 - Sections 17, 43, 43(1) and 50(3); ;Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 - Sections 7, 7(2), 19, 19(1), 19(2) and 19(4); ;Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; ;Punjab National Bank (Employee') Pension Regulations, 1995 - Regulations 2, 19, 19(4), 28 and 29; ;Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2 and 5; ;Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 21, 217 and 226; ;Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rule 48A(4); ;Punjab National Bank (Officers) Service Rules, 1979 - Rule 20; ;State Bank of India Employees' Provident Fund Rules; ;State Bank of India Employees' Pension Fund Rules; ;Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; ;State Bank of India Officers Service Rules; ;Salary Disbursement Act, 1971

Reported in : AIR2003SC858; 2003(3)ALLMR(SC)356; 2003(1)AWC798(SC); JT2002(10)SC436; (2003)ILLJ819SC; (2003)2SCC721; [2002]SUPP5SCR438; 2003(1)LC225(SC); (2003)1UPLBEC594

Advocate for Appellant : Mukul Rohtagi, Additional Soliciter General,; Soli J. Sorabjee, Attorney General,;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted in the special leave petitions.2. A common question, as to whether an employee who opts for the voluntary retirement pursuant to or in furtherance of a scheme floated by the Nationalised...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 1994

Jaipur Development Authority Vs. Radhey Shyam and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-17-1994

Subject : Property

Acts : Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 9, 10, 11, 17, 18, 26(2), 31(3) and 31(4); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 47

Reported in : JT1998(4)SC416; 1994(2)SCALE243; (1994)4SCC370; [1994]2SCR1; 1994(1)LC746(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Aruneshwar Gupta, Adv

ORDERK. Ramaswamy and N. Venkatachala, JJ.1. These appeals arise from the order of the High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench dated December 20, 1991 made in Civil Revision Petition Nos. 591/91 and 646/90. The facts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 21 1997

Brooke Bond Lipton India Limited Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-21-1997

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : ILR1998KAR1466

Advocate for Appellant : Harish N. Salve, Senior Adv. and ;K.S. Ramabadran, Adv.

ORDERG.C. Bharuka, J.1. This revision petition, filed under section 23(1) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter, 'the Act'), is directed against the order dated August 24, 1995 passed by the Appellate Tribunal. By the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2008

Shyni Varghese and ors. Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-15-2008

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 19, 21, 21A, 25, 27 and 29; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 3 and 5(4); Prevention of Corruption Act (Amendment) Act, 1952 - Sections 5 and 5A; Evidence Act 1872; Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972 - Sections 25(1); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 109, 114, 161, 165, 165A, 172 to 188, 193 to 196, 199, 200, 201, 204, 205 to 211, 228, 406, 411, 420, 463, 471, 476 and 485; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 154, 155, 155(2), 156, 156(3), 173, 173(2), 190 to 199, 200, 202(1), 202, 203, 340, 482 and 537; Constitution of India - Articles 20(3) and 21

Reported in : 147(2008)DLT691

Advocate for Appellant : Harish Salve, Sr. Adv.; Ashish Jha an; Meenakshi Chatterjee, Advs. in W.P. (Crl.) Nos. 35, 56 and 438/0

ORDEROn the complaint of Inspector Madanjeet Singh, the Investigating Officer Inspector Sushil Chandra Sharma has filed the fresh charge sheet today against the 14 accused of which the accused Harish Sharma has been kept in column...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2008

Clifford Chance Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-19-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 5, 5(2), 9, 9(1) and 260A; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 42

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR428; 2009BusLR148(Bom); (2008)221CTR(Bom)1; [2009]318ITR237(Bom); [2009]176TAXMAN458(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Harish Salve, Sr. Adv, ;F.V. Irani and ;N. Sahu, Advs., i/b., S.K. Srivastav & Co.

V.C. Daga, J.1. These appeals are filed by the assessee under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short) against the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal('ITAT' for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2001

Sushil Ansal Vs. State Through Cbi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-11-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 36, 227, 228, 304, 304-A, 337 and 338; Cinematograph Act, 1952 - Sections 14; Indian Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rules 29(1), 30(4), 43, 50(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161; Cinematographic Rules, 1953; ;Cinematographic (Amendment) Rules, 1981

Reported in : 2002CriLJ1369; 95(2002)DLT623; 2002(63)DRJ585

Advocate for Appellant : Harish Salve, Solicitor General,; R.N. Trivedi, Additional Solicitor General,;

R.C. Chopra, J. 1. Morning of June 13, 1997 was as bright as ever but the evening turned out to be the darkest for those whose kith and kin had gone to the matinee show at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 1997

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Through Its Registrar Vs. Shirish K ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-30-1997

Subject : Constitution Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 124, 235, 309, 310 and 311

Reported in : AIR1997SC2631; JT1997(5)SC337; 1997(4)SCALE181; (1997)6SCC339; [1997]3SCR1131; 1997(2)LC152(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Harish Salve and; D.M. Nargolkar, Advs

ORDERK. Ramaswamy, J.1. This is an appeal by certificate granted by the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench on July 11, 1996 in Writ Petition No. 3095 of 1995 certifying that it is a fit case to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial