Advanced Search Results
The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Mangalore Vs. Central Aercan ...
Supreme Court of India
Jan-30-2006
Labour and Industrial
Employees Provident Fund and Misc. Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 2 and 7A; ;Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 3 to 12, 12A, 12A(1), 13, 13A and 13A(1); ;Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Central Rules, 1946 - Rule 3(1); ;Apprentices Act, 1961
AIR2006SC971; 2006(2)ALD62(SC); [2006(108)FLR805]; [2006(2)JCR121(SC)]; JT2006(2)SC45; 2006(2)KarLJ287; (2006)ILLJ995SC; 2006(2)SCALE8; (2006)2SCC381; 2006(2)SLJ171(SC)
Harish Chandra, Sr. Adv.,; Anita Sahani and; Shail Kumar Dwi
Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court affirming the judgment of the learned Single Judge. Both the learned Single Judge and the Division...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKahan Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Nov-02-2004
Service
2005(1)AWC54
Harish Chandra Dwivedi, Adv.
Vineet Saran, J.1. The petitioner is an employee of the Respondent-U. P. State Sugar Corporation Limited, Amroha Unit, District Jyotiba Phule Nagar. The controversy in the present writ petition is with regard to the date of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDurga Prasad Vs. Mst. Parveen and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-10-1975
PropertyCivil
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123 and 162; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 2 - Order 11, Rule 19(2) - Order 41, Rule 1; Mineral Concession Rules, 1949 - Rule 41; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 27; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 28 - Schedule - Article 47; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145(6); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105 and 108
AIR1975MP196
S.P. Hakim, Adv.
A.P. Sen, J. 1. This appeal, filedby the plaintiff Durga Prasad, is directed against the Judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge, Chhind-wara, dated 25-7-1970, decreeing his claim for damages for Rs. 36,000/- for wrongful...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Gopi Nath Agarwal Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, U.P. and V.P.
Allahabad
Aug-24-1955
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2, 2(6B), 66 and 66(2)
AIR1956All105; [1955]28ITR753(All)
R.S. Pathak, Adv.
V. Bhargava, J. 1. The assessee in the relevant account year ending with 9-7-1942, in respect of the assessment year 1943-44 was a Hindu undivided family carrying on a business in the name of Gopi Nath...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKaliyappan and anr. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.
Kerala
May-25-1987
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11, 11A, 12, 12(1) and 12(2)
AIR1988Ker271
C.P. Damodaran Nayar and; D. Krishna Prasad, Advs.
ORDERU.L. Bhat, J. 1. Land acquisition proceedings relating to 10 1/2 cents of land originally belonging to the second petitioner and now belonging to her husband, first petitioner, is challenged in these proceedings under Article 226...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Rukmani and ors. Vs. Ramanlal and ors.
Rajasthan
Nov-24-1980
Property
1980WLN(UC)496
S.N. Deedwania, J.1. This civil execution second appeal is filed against the judgment and decree, dated March 14, 1979 in the following circumstances:--A decree for rent and ejectment was obtained by respondent No 1 Ramanlal against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSher Khan Vs. the State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-16-1999
CivilLimitation
Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 17(1), 17(3), 17(6), 18(2), 21 and 21(1); Arms Rules, 1962 - Rules 46 and 55
2000CriLJ783; 2000(1)MPHT273; 2000(3)MPLJ331
N.L. Raipuriya, Adv.
S.P. Srivastava, J.1. Feeling aggrieved by an order dismissing his writ petition upholding the order passed by the Commissioner whereunder the petitioner's appeal directed against the order cancelling the fire arm licence issued to him, as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVed Prakash and ors. Vs. Ved Mata Gayatri Trust and ors.
Uttaranchal
Jul-08-2005
Trusts and SocietiesCivil
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80G; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 92, 92(1) and 104
AIR2005Utr43
Sudhir Singh, Adv.
P.C. Verma, J.1. The appellants preferred this appeal under Section 104 of the Civil Procedure Code against the order dated 31-7-2001 passed by the District Judge, Hardwar In Civil Misc. Case No. 12 of 1999 Sri...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs, New Delhi Vs. ProdelIn India (P) Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-31-2006
Customs
Customs Valuation (Determination of Price of Imported Goods) Rules, 1988 - Rules 2(2), 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(3), 5 to 8 and 9(1); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 14, 14(1), 14(1A) and 14(2)
2006(202)ELT13(SC); JT2006(8)SC615; 2006(8)SCALE748; (2006)10SCC280; 2006(2)LC1156(SC)
Harish Chandra, Sr. Adv.,; Rudreshwar Singh and; B. Krishna Pr
AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. This appeal is filed by the Commissioner of Customs (ICDs), Tughlakabad against the final order No. 1425/04-NB-A dated 20.12.2004 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in Appeal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVandana Karki and ors. Vs. L. Chandrakishore Singh and ors.
Guwahati
Sep-14-1998
ServiceConstitution
Manipur Police Service Rules, 1965 - Rules 4, 5, 5(1), 13, 14, 14(1), 14(2), 14(3), 14(4), 15, 15(2), 16, 17(1), 24, 25 and 28; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 141, 142 and 309; Delhi and Andaman and Nicober Island Police Service Rules, 1971 - Rules 4, 5, 14, 15, 16, 24, 25 and 29; Delhi, Himachal Pradesh and Andaman and Nicobar Island Police Services Rules, 1965 - Rule 15(4)
Mr. N.P.C. Singh and Mr. B.P. Sahu, Advs.
P.K. Sarkar, J. 1. Three significant questions have been raised in these two Writ appeals and have been referred to the Full Bench for adjudication by the Division Bench of this Court in the following terms:-...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »