Advanced Search Results
R.K. JaIn Vs. Union of India and Others
Supreme Court of India
May-14-1993
Constitution Customs
Constitution of India - Articles 19(6), 32, 53(1), 73(1), 74 (1 and 2), 75(1), 77(3), 78, 142(1), 144, 154(1), 217, 226, 227, 309 and 323-A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123, 124 and 162; Administration of Justice Act, 1970 - Sections 31 to 34; The Administrative Procedure Act - Article 552
AIR1993SC1769; 1993(65)ELT305(SC); JT1993(3)SC297; 1993(2)SCALE843; (1993)4SCC120; [1993]3SCR802; (1993) 4 SCC 119
ORDERA.M. Ahmadi, J.1. We have had the benefit of the industry, erudition and exposition of the constitutional and jurisprudential aspects of law on the various questions urged before us in the judgment of our esteemed Brother...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMs. Gammon India Ltd. Vs. Commnr. of Customs, Mumbai
Supreme Court of India
Jul-06-2011
Customs
The Customs Act - Section 130E(b), 25
1. This Civil Appeal, under Section 130 E(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 (for short the Act ), is directed against order dated 4th April, 2003 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Gammon India Ltd. Vs. Commnr. of Customs
Supreme Court of India
Jul-06-2011
Customs
The Customs Act 1962 - Sections 130E, 25; The Indian Partnership Act 1932
1. This Civil Appeal, under Section 130E(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 (for shortthe Act ), is directed against order dated 4th April, 2003 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, as it...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commnr. of Central Excise, Calcutta Vs. Panihati Rubber Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-08-2006
Excise
Companies Act; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4(4); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173C; Constitution of India - Article 136
2006(202)ELT41(SC); JT2006(8)SC608; 2006(9)SCALE67; (2006)10SCC129; 2006(2)LC1139(SC)
Harish Chander, Sr. Adv.,; Anuvrat Sharma,; Sanjay Kumar Si
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted. 2. The respondent, which is a Company incorporated and registered under the Indian Companies Act, manufactures 'Hose Pipe'. It supplies goods manufactured by it to the Indian Railways. The goods are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarish Chander and Billa Vs. State
Delhi
Apr-05-1995
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313 ; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27 and 165
1995IIAD(Delhi)176; 1995CriLJ3036; 1995(3)Crimes189; 1995(33)DRJ424
Mr. D.C. Mathur and; Ms. Rebecca M. John, Advs
S.D. Pandit, J.1. These two appeals are preferred by the original accused Nos. 1 & 2 in Sessions Case No. 19/86, both these appeals are being disposed by this common judgment.2. Appellants Harish Chand @ Billa...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadbu Bala Vs. State (Delhi Administration)
Delhi
Aug-11-1989
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 307
1990CriLJ790; 1989(17)DRJ178
D.C. Mathur,; D.K. Mathur and; Rupinder Wasu, Advs
Charanjit Talwar, J. (1) The dying declarations made by Vinod Bala are the basis of conviction of her sister-in-law Madhu Bala, the appellant herein for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. (2)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevki Nandan Malhotra and ors. Vs. Rajendra Singh and ors.
Delhi
Oct-03-2011
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166, 163-A, 140
Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv.
1. By this common order, it is proposed to decide both the aforesaid appeals which have arisen from the same motor accident and the claims in respect of which have been decided by the Motor Accidents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevki Nandan Malhotra and ors. Vs. Rajendra Singh and ors.
Delhi
Oct-03-2011
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166, 163-A, 140
Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv.
1. By this common order, it is proposed to decide both the aforesaid appeals which have arisen from the same motor accident and the claims in respect of which have been decided by the Motor Accidents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Darshana Devi and anr. Vs. Des Raj Singh Thakur
Punjab and Haryana
May-07-1997
Tenancy
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(2) and 15(5)
(1997)116PLR588
V.K. Jain, Sr. Adv. and; J.L. Malhotra, Adv.
V.K. Jhanji, J.1. The ejectment of the tenant was sought on the grounds; (i) for non-payment of rent with effect from 16.7.1982; (ii) for sub-letting to one Harish Chander; and (iii) for impairing the value and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaster Nitish Arora Vs. State of Delhi and ors.
Delhi
Jan-31-2007
FamilyProperty
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 263, 296 and 273; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 145 - Order 5, Rule 12, 20 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145
141(2007)DLT21; 2007(94)DRJ407
R.S. Dhull, Adv
Gita Mittal, J1. By this order, I propose to dispose of is No. 1002/2001 filed under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for short 'CPC' filed by Smt. Santosh Soni, respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »