Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: harish chander · Page 1 of about 473 results (0.073 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 14 1993

R.K. JaIn Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-14-1993

Subject : Constitution Customs

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(6), 32, 53(1), 73(1), 74 (1 and 2), 75(1), 77(3), 78, 142(1), 144, 154(1), 217, 226, 227, 309 and 323-A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123, 124 and 162; Administration of Justice Act, 1970 - Sections 31 to 34; The Administrative Procedure Act - Article 552

Reported in : AIR1993SC1769; 1993(65)ELT305(SC); JT1993(3)SC297; 1993(2)SCALE843; (1993)4SCC120; [1993]3SCR802; (1993) 4 SCC 119

ORDERA.M. Ahmadi, J.1. We have had the benefit of the industry, erudition and exposition of the constitutional and jurisprudential aspects of law on the various questions urged before us in the judgment of our esteemed Brother...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2011

Ms. Gammon India Ltd. Vs. Commnr. of Customs, Mumbai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-06-2011

Subject : Customs

Acts : The Customs Act - Section 130E(b), 25

1. This Civil Appeal, under Section 130 E(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 (for short the Act ), is directed against order dated 4th April, 2003 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2011

M/S. Gammon India Ltd. Vs. Commnr. of Customs

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-06-2011

Subject : Customs

Acts : The Customs Act 1962 - Sections 130E, 25; The Indian Partnership Act 1932

1. This Civil Appeal, under Section 130E(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 (for shortthe Act ), is directed against order dated 4th April, 2003 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, as it...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 08 2006

Commnr. of Central Excise, Calcutta Vs. Panihati Rubber Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-08-2006

Subject : Excise

Acts : Companies Act; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4(4); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173C; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 2006(202)ELT41(SC); JT2006(8)SC608; 2006(9)SCALE67; (2006)10SCC129; 2006(2)LC1139(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Harish Chander, Sr. Adv.,; Anuvrat Sharma,; Sanjay Kumar Si

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted. 2. The respondent, which is a Company incorporated and registered under the Indian Companies Act, manufactures 'Hose Pipe'. It supplies goods manufactured by it to the Indian Railways. The goods are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 1995

Harish Chander and Billa Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-05-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313 ; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27 and 165

Reported in : 1995IIAD(Delhi)176; 1995CriLJ3036; 1995(3)Crimes189; 1995(33)DRJ424

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D.C. Mathur and; Ms. Rebecca M. John, Advs

S.D. Pandit, J.1. These two appeals are preferred by the original accused Nos. 1 & 2 in Sessions Case No. 19/86, both these appeals are being disposed by this common judgment.2. Appellants Harish Chand @ Billa...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 1989

Madbu Bala Vs. State (Delhi Administration)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-11-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 307

Reported in : 1990CriLJ790; 1989(17)DRJ178

Advocate for Appellant : D.C. Mathur,; D.K. Mathur and; Rupinder Wasu, Advs

Charanjit Talwar, J. (1) The dying declarations made by Vinod Bala are the basis of conviction of her sister-in-law Madhu Bala, the appellant herein for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. (2)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 2011

Devki Nandan Malhotra and ors. Vs. Rajendra Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-03-2011

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166, 163-A, 140

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv.

1. By this common order, it is proposed to decide both the aforesaid appeals which have arisen from the same motor accident and the claims in respect of which have been decided by the Motor Accidents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 2011

Devki Nandan Malhotra and ors. Vs. Rajendra Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-03-2011

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166, 163-A, 140

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv.

1. By this common order, it is proposed to decide both the aforesaid appeals which have arisen from the same motor accident and the claims in respect of which have been decided by the Motor Accidents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 1997

Smt. Darshana Devi and anr. Vs. Des Raj Singh Thakur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-07-1997

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(2) and 15(5)

Reported in : (1997)116PLR588

Advocate for Appellant : V.K. Jain, Sr. Adv. and; J.L. Malhotra, Adv.

V.K. Jhanji, J.1. The ejectment of the tenant was sought on the grounds; (i) for non-payment of rent with effect from 16.7.1982; (ii) for sub-letting to one Harish Chander; and (iii) for impairing the value and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2007

Master Nitish Arora Vs. State of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2007

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 263, 296 and 273; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 145 - Order 5, Rule 12, 20 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145

Reported in : 141(2007)DLT21; 2007(94)DRJ407

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Dhull, Adv

Gita Mittal, J1. By this order, I propose to dispose of is No. 1002/2001 filed under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for short 'CPC' filed by Smt. Santosh Soni, respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial