Advanced Search Results
Sandeep Prakash Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Mumbai
Dec-20-2002
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 169, 173, 173(2) and 482; Constitution of India - Article 21
2003BomCR(Cri)1171; 2003(2)MhLj818
C. Hari Shankar, Adv.
J.G. Chitre, J.1. This application is heard finally today as requested by counsel of both parties. This criminal application has exposed a very strange phenomena of the life and a page in the life of a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmbica Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Supreme Court of India
May-18-2007
CivilExcise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 33, 35C, 35G, 35G(1), 35G(9), 35H, 36B, 66, 66(1), 66(2), 66(8) and 274(2); Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 144 and 145; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 33, 66 and 66(1); Customs Act; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 1A, 2(11), 10A and 10F; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 20, 100, 100(1), 141 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 23, Rule 1
2007(213)ELT323(SC); JT2007(8)SC467; 2007(8)SCALE488; (2007)6SCC769; [2007]9STT1; (2009)20VST1(SC)
C. Hari Shankar,; Jagdish N.,; S. Sunil,;
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. The issue which arises for our consideration in these appeals relates to determination of situs of the High Court in which appeals would lie under Section 35G(1) of the Central Excise...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunni Devi and ors. Vs. Anguri Devi
Madhya Pradesh
May-09-1998
Family
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 372; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114
AIR1999MP31; 1998(2)MPLJ648
S.S. Bansal, Adv.
ORDERS.P. Srivastava, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved by an order under Section 383 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), on the application filed by the contesting respondent, the mother of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shri B.L. Dhaluka, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Nov-22-2002
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 112, 113, 114, 129E and 140; ;Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F
2003(154)ELT59(Del)
C. Hari Shankar, Adv
D.K. Jain, J.1. Rule D.B.2. Since a short point of law is involved, with the consent of counsel for the parties, we proceed to dispose of all these matters finally at this stage itself.3. The issue...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskY. Bhaskara Raju Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-05-2007
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 7, 8D(1), 11(6), 11(8), 23(1), 23(3) and 24; Indian Contract Act - Sections 74; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 67; Sale of Goods Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 2, Rule 2; Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966; Constitution of India - Article 226
2008(1)ALD612; 2008(3)ALT370
N. Vidya Prasad, Adv.
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. These writ petitions are coming up for admission. Sri Rajiv Reddy, learned Counsel, who had accepted notice on behalf of the respondents, had raised a preliminary objection relating to the maintainability of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Nath Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Sep-01-1924
Criminal
AIR1925All230; 83Ind.Cas.654; 84Ind.Cas.714
Mukerji, J.1. The applicant, Babu Ram Nath, who is a practising Mukhtar at Agra was convicted by a First Class Magistrate of Agra of the offences under Sections 419 and 465 of the Indian Penal Code,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHari Shankar Vs. State
Delhi
Feb-12-1996
Criminal
1996CriLJ1839
Hirdyajot Singh, Adv
1. The appellant Shri Hari Shankar, feeling aggrieved by his conviction under the Contempt of Courts Act by Shri Rajesh Aggarwal, a learned Civil Judge has filed this Criminal Appeal. 2. The appellant has read out...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMukesh Kumar Vs. Smt. Kamlesh Devi and ors
Delhi
May-11-2011
Criminal
Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 166, 140, 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 279, 304-A; Representation of the People Act, 1951
Mr. Hari Shankar, Adv.
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 27th May, 2009 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Delhi. 2. The brief facts leading to the filing of the appeal are as follows....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAtma Steels (P) Ltd. Vs. Harbir Singh
Delhi
Nov-01-1985
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 21
29(1986)DLT456; 1986(10)DRJ216; 1986RLR73
Hari Shankar and ; K.L. Sethi, Advs
J.D. Jain, J.(1) The controversy in this second appeal against order dated 8th August 1984 of the Rent Control Tribunal lies in a narrow compass ; the crucial question which falls for consideration bearing whether an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaresh Ahlawat Vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.
Delhi
Jul-07-2006
Service
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 376; Madhya Pradesh Cooperative Central Bank Employees Rules, 1977 - Rule 49
131(2006)DLT46; 2007(2)SLJ250(Delhi)
C. Hari Shankar,; P. Mohapatra,; Harpreet Singh and ;
T.S. Thakur, J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal arises out of an order passed by a learned single Judge of this Court whereby a writ petition filed by the appellant herein challenging an order granting only 50%...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »