Advanced Search Results
Union of India Vs. Ganpat Rai
Delhi
Aug-22-1974
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 56; Constitution of India - Article 14
1975RLR129
H.S. Dhir and; Harbans Singh, Advs
H.L. Anand, J. (1) Respondent entered into an agreement with Railway on 15-12-50 for doing certain work. It was extended up to 3-3-52. In March, 1952, respondent gave bill for Rs. 4,000.00 & asked refund of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaulana ShamsuddIn Vs. Khushilal and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-08-1978
Tenancy
Bhopal State Land Revenue Act, 1932 - Sections 2(5), 2(15), 2(21), 167 and 194; Bhopal State Sub-tenants Protection Act, 1952; Bhopal State Sub- tenants (of Occupants) Protection Act, 1954 - Sections 2
AIR1978SC1740; (1979)1SCC121; [1979]1SCR582; 1978(10)LC723(SC)
Harbans Singh, Adv
Untwalia, J.1. In this appeal by certificate granted by the Madhya Pradesh High Court the question of law which falls for our determination is whether conferral of Bhumiswami rights on Shri Khushi Lal, respondent No. 1...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT. Kunhammad and Ors. Vs. M. Narayanan Nambudiri's Son Narayanan Nambu ...
Kerala
Jul-22-1963
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 6 and 7 - Schedules - Articles 142 and 144; Madras Nambudiri Act, 1933 - Sections 5
AIR1964Ker8
V.P. Gopalan Nambiar and; K.P. Madhava Menon, Advs. (Nos. 13 to 19)
Madhavan Nair, J.1. This appeal has arisen in a suit for partition of a Nambudiri Illom ignoring certain alienations executed by its karnavan, the 1st defendant, in favour of defendants 6 to 156. At the time...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Harbans Singh Vs. Punjab State
Punjab and Haryana
Apr-23-1959
Arbitration
Indian Arbitration Act - Sections 28 and 33; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 21
AIR1960P& H182
ORDER(1) This revision is directed against the order of the learned Subordinate Judge, 1st Class, Amritsar, dated 17-5-1958, dismissing the application of Shri Harbans Singh Petitioner under S. 33 of the Indian Arbitration Act.(2) On 19-4-1954...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Tarsem Lal and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-21-2006
Service
AIR2007SC259; 2007(1)AWC131(SC); [2006(111)FLR437]; JT2006(12)SC331; 2006(9)SCALE485; (2006)10SCC145; 2006(3)ShimLC334; 2007(2)SLJ46(SC); 2006AIRSCW6030; 2007(1)AIRKarR553.
T.S. Doabia, Sr. Adv.,; Shailendra Sharma,; D.S. Mehra a
Arijit Pasayat, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Union of India and its functionaries call in question correctness of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing the writ petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalkari and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Aug-11-1975
Criminal
1976CriLJ828; 1975()WLN812
M.L. Shrimal, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the convicts Balkan and Multan against the judgment of the Sessions Judge, Ganganagar dated May 24, 1971 whereby Balkan was convicted under Section 302 I. P. C...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPhinder Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Aug-09-1985
Criminal
1985(2)WLN764
Mr. Garg
Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. Appellant Phindersingh was tried for the offence under Sections 302 and 449 IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act by the Sessions Judge, Sri Ganganagar by the judgment dated July...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurinder Singh Babra Vs. Bhushan Kumar Sharma
Punjab and Haryana
Apr-22-2003
Tenancy
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(3) and 15; East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction (Amendment) Act, 1956
(2003)135PLR104
Alka Sarin, Adv.
Amar Dutt, J. 1. The petitioner, through this petition, seeks to challenge the judgment dated 26.11.1981 passed by the Appellate Authority, Amritsar, by which the order passed by the Rent Controller, Amritsar on 9.6.1981 in his...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBharpoor Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Dec-06-1984
Criminal
Opium Act - Sections 9; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482
AIR1986P& H149
K.P.S. Sandhu, J.1. The precise question of law which necessitated this reference to a larger Bench is as to whether the investigating agency is competent to send a second sample of opium for analysis to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDaya Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-18-1993
Civil
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23
(1993)104PLR655
M.L. Sarin, Sr. Adv. and; Alka Sarin, Adv.
N.C. Jain, J.1. This judgment of mine would dispose of R.F.A. Nos. 481, 482, 487 of 1984 filed by the State of Haryana and R.F.A. No. 1609 of 1984 filed by the claimants The facts of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »