Advanced Search Results

Official Liquidator Vs. Surya Partap Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 454, 454(2) and 454(5)

Reported in : [1996]86CompCas134(P& H); (1996)112PLR669

Advocate for Appellant : Amit Sethi, Adv.

G.C. Garg, J.1. This criminal complaint has been filed by the official liquidator under Sub-section (5) of Section 454 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act'), against Surya Partap Singh, Mukta Devi and Pardip...

Jit Singh Mohar Singh Vs. Municipal Committee and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1961CriLJ272

ORDERI.D. Dua, J.1. This case has been reported by the learned Sessions Judge, Ludiana, with a recommendation that the conviction and sentence of the petitioner be set aside and he be acquitted. The facts as appear...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Har Parshad and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143, 143(3), 144, 146 and 148

Reported in : [1989]178ITR591(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Bhan, Sr. Adv. and; Ajay Mittal, Adv.

K.S. Bhalla, J.1. On an application under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called 'the Act'), by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Haryana and Chandigarh, Rohtak, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh, has referred...

Dr. Santosh Kumar Jha Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Umesh Sinha, Mr. Anil Singh, Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Ms. Priyanka, Ms. Awasthi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 211 of 2008 Reserved on: July 25, 2014 Decision on: August 20, 2014 DR. SANTOSH KUMAR JHA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sinha, Mr. Anil Singh,...

Sikander @ Mohd. Shafi Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 354(3)

Reported in : 1992(2)Crimes970; 1992(24)DRJ295; ILR1993Delhi40

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sethi

Mohd. Shamim, J.(1) This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 5.8.91/9.8.91 passed by Shri S.M. Aggarwal learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby he found the appellant guilty under Section 302 of the Indian Penal...

Manni Ram Vs. Bishan Dial and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All297

1. Sarab Sukh Rai, the original proprietor of mauza Barauli, died in 1844, leaving a widow, Ram Kuar, and three sons, Sheo Dial, Gulab Rai, and Bishan Dial. In 1864 Sheo Dial, who appears to have...

The State Vs. Amir Chand

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Sections 3 and 4; Constitution of India - Article 246

Reported in : AIR1953P& H1

Advocate for Appellant : Har Pershad, Asst. Adv. General

Bhandari, J.1. The short point for decision in the present case is whether it was within the competence of the Rationing Controller of Ambala to make an order requiring certain persons to submit certain returns. The...

Mani Ram and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Public Gambling Act, 1867 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6

Reported in : AIR1954P& H164

Advocate for Appellant : Bhagirath Dass, Adv.

Khosla, J.1. This case was referred to a Division Bench by my brother Soni J. because he felt that the principles governing the interpretation of Section 6 of the Public Gambling Act refluired to be stated...

The State Vs. Shanti Prakash

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Punjab Pure Food Act, 1929 - Sections 4 and 13

Reported in : AIR1957P& H56; 1957CriLJ390

Advocate for Appellant : Har Parshad, Asst. Adv. General

Kapur J. 1. This judgment will dispose of the two appeals (Criminal Appeals Nos. 552 and 553 of 1955) which have been filed by the State against an order of acquittal passed in these two cases...

Firm Gulab Rai Girdhari Lal and ors. Vs. Firm Bansi Lal Hansraj

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 19

Reported in : AIR1959P& H103

Advocate for Appellant : Har Parshad and; R.K. Aggarwal, Advs.

A.N. Bhandari, C.J. 1. This appeal raises the question whether an order by which a Court sets aside an award under the provisions of Arbitration Act, 1940, must be deemed to be an order superseding the...