Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: h v ramesh · Page 1 of about 15 results (0.122 seconds)

Sep 19 2002

State by Thippagondanahalli Police Station Vs. Chikkabala Naika and or ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-19-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 156, 156(2) and 157; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 143, 148, 149, 324 and 307; Karnataka Police Act, 1965 - Sections 21

Reported in : ILR2002KAR5151; 2002(6)KarLJ165

Advocate for Appellant : H.V. Ramesh, Government Pleader

1. This criminal appeal is filed challenging the judgment and order of acquittal in S.C. No. 62 of 1990 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore, dated 20-12-1997. 2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 2003

Subbarayappa Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-05-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 374

Reported in : ILR2004KAR1235

Advocate for Appellant : B. Anand, Amicus Curiae

Mohan Shanthana Goudar, J. 1. The appellant is convicted accused for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC in S.C. No. 218/95 on the file of the I Addl. Sessions Judge, Kolar.The facts leading to this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 2003

Pradeep Vs. State by Sira Police

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-05-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 32; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302 and 304

Reported in : ILR2004KAR260; 2004(1)KarLJ314

Advocate for Appellant : G.M. Srinivasa Reddy, Amicus Curiae

1. This appeal is filed being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in Sessions Case No. 57 of 1999, dated 28-2-2001 holding the appellant guilty of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Nov 18 2003

Ameer Jan Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-18-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313, 378(1) and 378(3); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32(1)

Reported in : II(2004)DMC257; ILR2004KAR88; 2004(3)KarLJ149

Advocate for Appellant : Bhanuprakash, Amicus Curiae

Mohan Shantanagoudar, J.1. The appellant is convicted accused in Sessions case No. 4/2000, by the Addl. Sessions Court, Chickmagalur, vide judgment dated 7.5.2001 for the offence under Section 302 IPC.2. The brief facts leading to this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 2003

K. Ravindra Mallya Vs. the State of Karnataka, by State Public Prosecu ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-18-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Karnataka Excise Act - Sections 32, 34 and 43(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397 and 401

Reported in : ILR2003KAR3128; 2004(1)KarLJ561

Advocate for Appellant : A. Keshava Bhat, Adv.

ORDERVeerabhadraiah, J.1. The petitioner being aggrieved of the order passed in CRL APPEAL NO. 34/03 by the Prl Sessions Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore dt 18.6.2003 dismissing the appeal by confirming the order, has come up with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2004

State by Ulsoorgate Police Station Vs. B. Govindaraju

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-06-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 378(1), 378(3) and 482; Indian Panel Code, 1860 - Sections 409

Reported in : 2004(3)KarLJ22

Advocate for Appellant : H.V. Ramesh, High Court Government Pleader

1. The State of Karnataka has assailed the acquittal of the respondent-accused through the present appeal. According to the prosecution, the accused was the honorary Secretary of the Bangalore City Silk Handlooms Co-operative Weavers and Production...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2003

State by Gandhinagar Police Station Vs. Shivaji

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 390 and 392; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3

Reported in : 2004(3)KarLJ668

Advocate for Appellant : H.V. Ramesh, High Court Government Pleader

M.F. Saldhanha J.1. We have heard the learned Government Pleader on merits. The charge against the accused is one under Section 392 of the IPC and the facts of the case disclose that this is an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 2003

The State Vs. Peddahanumappa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-12-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 141, 146 and 300; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45 and 135

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2255

Advocate for Appellant : H.V. Ramesh, Govt. Pleader

M. F. Saldanha, J.1. We have heard the learned State counsel and the learned counsel who represents the respondents-accused. This is a case in which there are as many as 34 persons who have been charge-sheeted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2003

State by Shahabad Rural Police Station Vs. Dyavappa and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-15-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 323; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 378(1) and 378(3)

Reported in : 2004(2)KarLJ502

Advocate for Appellant : H.V. Ramesh, High Court Govt. Pleader

1. We have heard the learned Government Pleader and the learned Counsel who represents the accused-respondents. Technically, the learned State Counsel may be right when he points out that the Trial Court was in error in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2003

State of Karnataka Vs. N.R. Anthony Raj

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 409

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2252; 2004(2)KarLJ346

Advocate for Appellant : H.V. Ramesh, High Court Government Pleader

1. We have heard the learned Government Pleader on merits. His first submission is that the entrustment in respect of which the offence has taken place relates to an amount of Rs. 19,005/- which is the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

‹ Prev
1
2
Next ›
Last »

Advanced Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.