Advanced Search Results

Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation Vs. Madhukar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 85; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 405

Reported in : [2002(93)FLR596]; (2002)IILLJ640Bom

Advocate for Appellant : H.V. Mehta, Adv.

T.K. Chandrashekhara Das, J. 1. This Revision Application has been filed by the Regional Director of the Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Panchdeep Bhavan, Lower Parel, Mumbai-400 013, seeking to revise the order passed by the Metropolitan...

Union of India (Uoi) Through T.C. Subramanian, Income Tax Officer Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act - Sections 276C(1), 277, 278B, 279 and 279(2)

Reported in : (2008)215CTR(Bom)79; [2008]297ITR315(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : R.V. Desai and ;H.V. Mehta, Advs.

J.H. Bhatia, J. 1. Heard Mr. H. V. Mehta, the learned Counsel for the applicant - Union of India. None appeared for the respondents.2. Perused relevant documents and the impugned order, passed by the Additional Chief...

Union of India Vs. Prakash Mehra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [1999]107TAXMAN71(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : H.V. Mehta, for the Applicant Bansal Verma and R.Y. Mirza, for the Respondent

1. Leave to amend the revision, i,e., to add the State as party respondent, is granted. Amendment is carried out immediately. Heard APP for State along with Mr. Mehta for the petitioner and Mr. Verma for...

Homi Phiroze Ranina Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]131TAXMAN100(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : H.V. Mehta and R.Y. Mirza, for the Respondent

The applicants seek quashing of the order-dated 30-11-1996 passed by the learned Additional Chief M.M., 47th Court, Bandra in case Nos. 248-S to 251-S of 1993 and pray for their discharge in the said cases.2. The...

Rajesh Hansraj Chopra Vs. the Competent Authority and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 2(2), 4, 6, 6(1), 7, 8, 9, 9(2), (3), 12-A and 12-A(6); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21; Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1947 - Sections 11

Reported in : 2002BomCR(Cri)96; (2001)4BOMLR144; 2002(79)ECC776

Advocate for Appellant : Maqsood Khan, Adv.

1. This Writ Petition is directed against the Show Cause Notice dated 7.9.2000, Annexure B, issued by the Competent Authority, SAFEMA/ N.D.P.S., Bombay against the Petitioner under section 6(1) of the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators...

Smt. Lilavati Ramchandra Gaikwad Vs. Shri Satish Sahney, Commissioner ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 226; National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(2)

Reported in : 1996(4)BomCR636; 1997BomCR(Cri)51

Advocate for Appellant : Shirish Gupte and ;K.K. Pradhan, Advs.

R.G. Vaidyanatha, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 7th August, 1995. Heard Mr. Shirish Gupte, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rajiv Patil, the...

Environsare Foundation Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through Secretary and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Environment

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3(2); Coastal Region Zone Rules - Rule 5(3)

Reported in : 2003(2)BomCR519

Advocate for Appellant : Aspi Chinoy, Sr. Adv., ;S.K. Sen, ;P.R. Dhande and ;K. Dighe, Advs., i/b., D.H. Law and Associates in W.P. No. 41/2002, ;C.U. Singh and ;Sanjay Udeshi, Advs., i/b., Sanjay Udeshi and Co. in W.P. No. 1

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. These two petitions seek to challenge the legality and propriety of a pipeline of a distance of about 8.5 k.m. set up by respondent No. 8 Indian Oil Tanking Limited (I.D.T.L.) for carrying...

Smt. Aftari Begum Gani Shaikh Vs. R.D. Tyagi and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(2); Constitution of India, Article 22(5) and 226

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR820; 1999BomCR(Cri)820

Advocate for Appellant : C.K. Talekar, Adv.

ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Through this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner who is the mother of the detenu MohammedMushtafq Abdul Gani Shaikh has impugned the detention order dated 4th November 1996...

Shri Ghanshyam Raj Narayan Dubey Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 5-A; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : 1998(5)BomCR652

Advocate for Appellant : S. Desai, Shirish Gupte and ;Rajendra S. Desai, Advs.

ORDERA.V. Savant, J. 1. Heard all the learned Counsel-Shri Gupte for petitioner; Smt. Tahilramani, Asstt. Public Prosecutor for the State and Shri H.V. Mehta for respondent No. 7.2. This is a petition for a writ of...

D.H. Bhatter Vs. State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 9 and 138

Reported in : 2002(5)BomCR280; 2002BomCR(Cri)604; 2002CriLJ4851

Advocate for Appellant : I.P. Bagaria and ;U.I. Bagaria, Advs.

A.B. Palkar, J.1. By these petitions the petitioner who is arraigned as accused in Criminal Case No. 239/S of 1999 to 248/S of 1999 pending in the Court of the learned Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Esplanade,...