Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: h t joshi · Page 1 of about 15 results (0.054 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 31 1996

Baburao and Etc. Vs. the Collector, District Parbhani and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-31-1996

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - Sections 55; Constitution of India - Article 226; Maharashtra Municipalities (Conduct of Business) Rules, 1966 - Rule 34; Maharashtra Municipalities (Elections to Subjects Committees) Rules, 1966 - Rule 38; Maharashtra Municipalities (President Election) Rules, 1981- Rules 6 and 7; Municipal Councils (Co-option of Councillors) Rules, 1967 - Rule 7(4); Bombay Village Panchayat (Sarpanch and Upsarpanch) Election Rules, 1964

Reported in : AIR1997Bom49; (1996)98BOMLR567

Advocate for Appellant : H.T. Joshi, Adv.

ORDERChapalgaonkar, J.1. These writ petitions challenge proceedings of a special meeting of Parbhani Municipal Council held on 6-11-1995. The special meeting was called to consider vote of no confidence against President of the Council. 2. Shri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 2009

Maharashtra State Electricity Board Through the Assistant Controller o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-25-2009

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 8, 9 and 10; Common Law and the Carriers Act, 1965

Reported in : AIR2009Bom185; 2009(6)BomCR385

Advocate for Appellant : H.T. Joshi, Adv.

P.R. Borkar, J.1. Both these appeals arise out of same judgment and decree. Some of the facts giving rise to these appeals which remain undisputed at this stage are as under:.The Maharashtra State Electricity Board, which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 2003

Maharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. Pralhadsa Lahanusa Kashtriya a ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-23-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18

Reported in : 2004(1)MhLj649

Advocate for Appellant : H.T. Joshi, Adv.

B.H. Marlapalle, J. 1. The Government of Maharashtra had acquired the agricultural land located in Survey Nos. 374/1, 374/1/2, 375/1/2, 375/3 and 378 of Sangamner for the purpose of construction of 138 KV Sub Station of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 16 1996

Maharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. State of Maharashtra and Other ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-16-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 162, 226, 227 and 300-A; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 41, 55, 56 and 328; B.P.M. Corporations Act, 1940; Maharashtra Agriculatural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1936; Agriculture Produce Market Committee Act - Sections 43

Reported in : AIR1997Bom267; 1997(3)BomCR493

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. H.T. Joshi

ORDER1. This is a writ petition filed by the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (for short, MSEB) through its Executive Engineer (Civil Construction-Maintenance) Division Nasik Road, Nasik, to challenge the order made on 24-8-1995 by the State...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 1997

Madanlal Uttamchand Desarda Vs. Jugalkishor Shankarlal Bharuka and anr ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-04-1997

Subject : CivilTenancy

Reported in : (1997)99BOMLR748

V.K. Barde, J.1. Rule returnable forthwith.2. The applicant is admittedly the owner of municipal house No. 3-6-17, City Survey No. 6200, situated at Sarafa, Aurangabad, and the respondent No. 1 -Jugalkishor is a tenant in one...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 2000

Aurangabad Industrial Associates Through Its Proprietor Vs. State of M ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-28-2000

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1885 - Sections 25; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10

Reported in : 2001(3)BomCR554

Advocate for Appellant : S.A. Deshmukh, Adv.

V.K. Barde, J.1. The petitioner is running an industry in the name and style 'M/s. Aurangabad Industrial Associates'. M/s. K.K. Industries was holding the Plot No. G-25 situated at Chikhalthana, Aurangabad, which is an industrial area,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2007

Vinayak S/O Narhari Kolshikwar Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through It ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-17-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India; Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960; Maharashtra Births and Deaths Registration Rules, 1976 - Rule 13; Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 - Sections 8, 13, 16(1) and 22(1); Evidence Act - Sections 114; Births, Deaths and Marriages Act, 1886

Reported in : 2008(1)ALLMR716; 2008(1)BomCR126; 2008(2)MhLj179

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Barlinge, adv.

ORDERR.M. Borde, J.1. Some essential facts, giving rise to this petition, can be summarised as below:Petitioner claims to be belonging to 'Chhatri', Scheduled Tribe. He secured certificate on 29.01.1993, issued by Taluka Executive Magistrate, Nanded, certifying...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 24 1997

Smt. Parwatibai W/O Vijaydas Vaishnav and Others Vs. the State of Maha ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-24-1997

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 - Sections 45 and 46; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166 and 176; Maharashtra Motor Vehicles (Second Amendment), Rules, 1989 - Rule 257(3); Maharashtra Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Rules, 1996

Reported in : 1998ACJ965; 1998(4)ALLMR676; 1998(2)BomCR593; (1998)1BOMLR593; 1998(2)MhLj73

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Ashtekar, Adv., holding for ;D.B. Yeotikar

ORDERS. Vagyani, J.1. The short point that arises for consideration is what is the range application of the notification issued by the Government of Maharashtra granting exemption of Court Fees for woman litigants in cases relating...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2006

Vishwanath S/O Parshuram Kuduchkar Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-03-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : MSEB Employees Service Regulation - Regulations 88 and 92

Reported in : 2006(4)ALLMR531; 2006(3)MhLj817

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Choudhary, Adv.

S.P. Kukday, J. 1. By this petition, the petitioner is challenging the order of his dismissal from service dated 29th April, 1994, order dated 3rd September, 1994 passed by the Technical Director dismissing the first appeal;...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2008

Maharashtra State Electricity Board Through Executive Engineer, M.S.E. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-06-2008

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 10 and 10(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 7

Reported in : 2009(1)BomCR366; [2008(119)FLR219]; (2008)IIILLJ932Bom

Advocate for Appellant : H.T. Joshi, Adv.

P.R. Borkar, J.1. This is an appeal preferred by the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (M.S.E.B.) being dissatisfied with the judgment and order passed by the learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and Civil Judge Senior Division, Parbhani...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial