Advanced Search Results
Vineet Kumar Vs. Smt. Bhagwan Dei
Allahabad
Sep-02-1977
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30, 32 and 33; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14(2) and 43; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(18), 12, 122 and 125 - Order 22, Rule 9
AIR1978All312
H.S. Nigam, Adv.
ORDERM.P. Mehrotra, J.1. This application is palpably based on a false allegation. It has been stated in para 14 of the affidavit in support of the review application:'That against the order of the District Judge, Rampur,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Nazma Khan Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Aug-06-1998
Tenancy
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 21 and 300A; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 20, 21, 26, 26(1) and (2), 27, 28B and 31; Police Act, 1861 - Sections 13; Police Regulations - Regulations 199 and 200; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 452 and 506
1998(4)AWC465
H.S. Nigam and ;S.S. Nigam, Advs.
Binod Kumar Roy and R. K. Mahajan, JJ.1. The prayer of the petitioner is to command respondent Nos. 1 to 6 to protect life, property and privacy of her as well as the members of her...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParasram and ors. Vs. Smt. Naraini Devi and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-20-1972
FamilyProperty
Hindu Law; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 and 101; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115
AIR1972All357
H.S. Nigam, Adv.
K.B. Asthana, J.1. Sri H. S. Nigam, learned counsel for the plaintiff appellants, has sought to raise an interesting point in support of this appeal. Learned counsel submitted that the debt having been incurred by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Latif Ahmad and anr. Vs. Smt. Amtul Rahman and anr.
Allahabad
May-10-1978
TenancyLimitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 30- Schedule - Articles 51, 109, 113 and 120
AIR1978All423
H.S. Nigam, Adv.
Deoki Nandan, J.1. This is a defendants' second appeal in a suit for recovery of Rs. 2,235/-. The plaintiff came to the court with the allegations that the first defendant Jeet Ram was the tenant on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadan Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Feb-09-1999
Property
Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 47A and 48; Constitution of India - Article 141
1999(2)AWC996
H.S. Nigam, Adv.
B.K. Roy and Yatindra Singh, JJ.1. The prayer of the petitioner is to quash the order dated 10th February. 1992 as contained in Annexure-2. Annexure-2 contains a copy of letter dated 10.2.1992 issued by the Additional...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajendra Singh Gandhi and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad
May-15-1998
Commercial
Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963 - Rules 14, 14(2), (3) and (4), 21, 23, 23(1) and (3), 29, 29(1) and (2), 34, 36, 70 and 70(1)
1998(3)AWC1864
H.S. Nigam and ;S.S. Nigam, Advs.
B.K. Roy and P.K. Jain, JJ.1. Two-fold prayers have been made by the petitioners in this writ petition : (i) to quash the order dated 14.10.97 as contained in Annexure-10 by grant of writ of certiorari,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskU.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. Vs. Labour Court, Gorakhpur and Anot ...
Allahabad
May-26-1999
Labour and Industrial
Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 4K and 6F; Constitution of India - Article 226; Minimum Wages Act
1999(3)AWC2700
H.S. Nigam and ;S.S. Nigam, Advs.
K. Jain, J.1. Respondent No. 2 espousing the cause of ten workmen, namely, Rani Adhar Dixit, Sequan Dixit. Chandra Shekhar Dixit. Vijay Shankar Dixit. Ram Nakshatra Dixit, Salaraat, Indal Yadav, Mohan Dixit and Ram Dhari Yadav....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuraj Bhan JaIn and Another Vs. Ist Additional District Judge, Agra an ...
Allahabad
Sep-04-1997
TenancyCivil
Uttar Pradesh Urban Building (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 12, 12(4), 16(1), 18, 18(1) and 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XLI, Rule 27; Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Urban Building (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules, 1972 - Rule 13(4)
1998(1)AWC266
H.S. Nigam, Adv.
J.C. Gupta, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for the quashing of the order dated 23.4.1997 passed by respondent No. 1 whereby petitioner's application for bringing additional evidence on record of revision filed under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVineet Kumar Vs. Smt. Bhagwandei
Allahabad
Apr-05-1977
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 17, 32 and 33
AIR1977All403
H.S. Nigam, Adv.
ORDERM.P. Mehrotra, J.1. This revision is directed against an order whereby the trial court rejected a preliminary objection which was raised on behalf of the defendant to the maintainability of the suit.2. The brief facts are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskU.P. State Sugar Corporation Vs. Asst. Labour Commissioner and anr.
Allahabad
Apr-17-1993
Labour and Industrial
Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2A, 3 and 3A
[1994(68)FLR86]; (1994)IILLJ1046All
H.S. Nigam, Adv.
B.L. Yadav, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the employer U.P. State Sugar Corporation, is directed against the orders dated June 8, 1992, and dated February 2, 1993 (Annexures...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »