Advanced Search Results
M.D. Shipping Agency Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Gen), Mumbai
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
May-31-2012
Service Tax
For the Appellant : Shri H.R. Shetty, Advocate. For the Respondent : Shri A.K. Prabhakar, (AR).
Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) The appellant who is a CHA has filed this appeal against the revocation of their CHA licence no. 11/2006 on violation of provisions of Regulation of CHALR 2004. 2. The brief facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskH.P. Joshi and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jul-02-2012
Service Tax
For the Appellant : H.R. Shetty, Advocate. For the Respondent : A.K. Prabhakar, Superintendent (A.R).
Ashok Jindal 1. The appeal is against the impugned order passed by the Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai wherein the CHA Licence No. 11/205 has been revoked after initiation of proceedings under Regulation 22 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLalit Bhaichand Ravani Vs. Union of India
Mumbai
Feb-28-1991
Customs
Customs Act - Sections 129E
1991(56)ELT337(Bom)
Mr. J.F. Pochkhanawala and ;Mr. H.R. Shetty, Advs.
ORDERPendse, J. 1. By this motion, the petitioner requests that respondents Nos. 2 and 3 be committed to civil jail and fine be imposed for wilfully disobeying the order dated July 23, 1990 passed by one...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
R.G. Gawade Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Ep)
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
May-10-2010
Service Tax
Shri H.R. Shetty, Advocate for the appellant. Shri S.S.Katiyar, Authorized Representative (SDR) for the respondent.
Per: P.G. Chacko: There are two applications before us, one for condonation of the delay of the appeal and the other for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the penalty imposed on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCc Vs. Carpet House and anr.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Dec-04-1998
MRTP
(1999)(82)LC377Tri(Mum.)bai
1. These are two reference applications filed by the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai in respect of a combined order bearing number 1899-1902/96-WRB dated July 1996 rejecting two appeals filed by the Commissioner and holding that the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.K. Mehta and Rajesh M. Desai Vs. Commissioner of Customs,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Nov-05-2001
Land Acquisition
1. The above applications for waiver of pre-deposit of penalty of Rs.50 lakhs imposed on Shri Rajesh Desai and of Rs.1,00,000/- on Shri V.K.Mehta arise out of the order of the Commissioner of Customs and are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKothari and Sons Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Feb-27-1997
Land Acquisition
(1997)(94)ELT219Tri(Mum.)bai
Shri. H.R. Shetty Ld. Counsel
1. The appellant is a Custom House Agent whose CHA licence was suspended vide order dated 12-3-1996 passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai. The appeal has been filed by them on 22-10-1996 after it was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManoj Manaharlal Bhatt, Riken Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Acc,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Sep-07-2001
Direct Taxation
1. Arguing the applications for waiver of pre-deposit of penalty of Rs. 25,000/- imposed on M/s. Chaudhary & Sons on the ground that:(a) goods imported were found to be in excess of the quantity declared, (b)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVaku Sidi Patel Vs. Commissioner of Customs (P)
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Sep-24-1997
Education
(1997)(96)ELT192Tri(Mum.)bai
1. When the matter was called, appellant Shri Vaku Sidi Patel is not present and is not represented. The appellant has however, acknowledged of the Notice for todays hearing of the appeal. The appeal is therefore...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Cus. (Ep) Vs. Virendra Kanshiram Gandhi
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Nov-12-2002
Land Acquisition
(2003)(155)ELT128Tri(Mum.)bai
1. The above applications have been filed by the Revenue for stay of operation of the impugned order of the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai by which he has confirmed the duty demand of Rs. 9,74,52,797/- against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »