Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: h p mudlappa · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.022 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 03 1995

Chinnappa Vs. Srinivasa Reddy

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-03-1995

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 39

Reported in : ILR1996KAR932; 1996(1)KarLJ114

Advocate for Appellant : C.B. Srinivasan and ;Byareddy, Advs.

ORDERHari Nath Tilhari, J. 1.This Revision Petition has been listed along with the application for vacation of exparte interim order of stay. But, to avoid further delay in the matter of disposal of the Revision I...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 1988

Siddalingiah Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-17-1988

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 - Sections 3, 4 and 5; Darkhast Rules - Rule 43(8)

Reported in : ILR1989KAR2311

Advocate for Appellant : H.P. Mudlappa, Adv.

ORDERRamakrishna, J. 1. Even though these cases are posted for orders, by consent of both parties, they are heard on merits and disposed of by this common order.2. The petitioners in these two petitions have sought...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 1991

Sampathkumar Vs. Tahsildar

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-12-1991

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Karnataka Village Offices Abolition Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 5, 5(3), 6, 7 and 7A; Karnataka Village Offices Abolition (Amendment) Act - 1978

Reported in : ILR1991KAR4030; 1991(3)KarLJ604

Advocate for Appellant : H.P. Mudlappa, Adv.

ORDERM. Ramakrishna, J. 1. It is not in dispute that two survey numbers viz., Sy. No. 23 of Bidalur village, Thyamagondlu Hobli, Nelamangala Taluk, Bangalore District measuring 2-10 guntas and Sy. No. 39 of Kodihalli village,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 08 1995

Tulasamma Vs. Srinivasan

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-08-1995

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 133

Reported in : ILR1995KAR1328; 1995(2)KarLJ300

Advocate for Appellant : H.P. Mudlappa, Adv.

Saldanha, J1. Heard appellant's learned Advocate and respondent's learned Advocate.2. The principal ground on which the order passed by the trial Court has been challenged by the appellant's learned Advocate is that according to him, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2002

M.S. Ganesh and ors. Vs. H.K. Subramanya and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-27-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 226 and 227; Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 15(1) and 15(3); Karnataka State Civil Services Act, 1978 - Sections 3 and 8; Karnataka State Civil Services (Absorption of Contract Group 'C' Employees in the Karnataka Government Secretariat Service) (Special) Rules, 1996; Karnataka State Civil Services (Absorption of Contract Group 'D' Employees in the Karnataka Government Secretariat Service) (Special) Rules, 1996; General Recruitment Rules - Rule 15(1) and 15(2)

Reported in : ILR2002KAR4123; 2003(5)KarLJ306; (2004)ILLJ246Kant

Advocate for Appellant : M.H. Datar, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 25521 to 25525, 25527 to 25530, 25533 and 25534 of 1997, ;M.V. Hiremath, Adv. in W.P. No. 29315 of 1997, ;H.P. Mudlappa, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 29540 to 29546 of 1997, ;Jayaku

ORDERR.V. Raveendran, J.1. As all these petitions challenge the common order dated 25-7-1997 of the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal, in Application Nos. 7948 to 7954, 8001, 8002, 8069 to 8078 and 8078-A of 1996 and Application Nos....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2010

Mallappa B Kale vs. the Hon'Ble Speaker Karnataka Legislative Assembly ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-09-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Articles 226, 227

Advocate for Appellant : SHRI H.P.MUDLAPPA, ADV

ORDER1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner. The Government Advocate is directed to take notice for respondents 1 to 3. As far as respondents 4 and 5 are concerned, the submission made is that they...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 1986

Dr. Kshama Kapur Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-18-1986

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 19, 21 and 74

Reported in : ILR1986KAR4007

Advocate for Appellant : M.N. Hegde and ;H.P. Mudlappa, Advs.

ORDERRama Jois, J.1. In these two Writ Petitions, the following question of law arises for consideration :'Whether in view of Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 ('the Act' for short), an Administrative Tribunal constituted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial