Advanced Search Results

Purvanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited and anr. Vs. Vidyut Lokpal (Ele ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : 2008(3)AWC2784

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. H.P. Dube, Shri. H. P. Dube

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Shri H.P. Dube, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ashutosh Mishra, caveator for the respondent No. 2. With the consent of the parties, the matter was heard and is being finally...

Friends Tour and Travels Vs. Cestat

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : 2010[18]STR391

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. H.P. Dube

ORDER1. This is an appeal against the order of Tribunal dated 17th February, 2009 by which the Tribunal has allowed the application for waiver of pre-deposit of the Service tax in part and directed the appellant...

Pramod Chandra Pant Vs. Chief Engineer, U.P. Power Corporation Limited ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilProperty

Reported in : 2010(1)AWC376

Poonam Srivastav, J.1. Heard Sri Atul Dayal, counsel for landlord/petitioner and Sri H.P. Dube and Sri R.C. Singh, counsels for tenant/respondents.2. Petitioner is owner and landlord of premises No. 359, Bara Bazar. Thakurdwara, Moradabad, which consists...

Maa Vind Vasini Industries (a Partnership Concern Registered Under the ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : 2008(1)AWC1002

Sudhir Agarwal, J.1. Heard Sri U.N. Sharma, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri May auk Agrawal and Sri Krishna Agrawal, Advocates for the petitioners, Sri H.P. Dube, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 3 and learned Standing...

Ram Bali Vs. Tulsi

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 8(1), 8(2) and 30; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1964All231

Advocate for Appellant : H.P. Dube and ;S.N. Misra, Advs.

ORDERS.C. Manchanda, J. 1. This is a revision application against the order of the Civil Judge, Jaunpur dated, the 27th of February 1962, whereby the order of the Munsif holding that there was legal misconduct by...

Harish Chandra Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC45

Advocate for Appellant : H.P. Dube and ;Ashok Khare, Advs.

O. P. Garg, J.1. These are three connected writ petitions, raising common questions of fact and law and, therefore, they are being disposed of by this common judgment. Harish Chandra-Petitioner was appointed as clerk-cum-Cataloguer on 10th...

Manzoor Ahmad Vs. the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, U.P. Lucknow ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Secions 76, 90 and 104; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 2(28A) and (38), 68C, 68D, 68D(3), 68E(1), 68FF and 68-F(1-D); Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226

Reported in : AIR1994All202

Advocate for Appellant : H.P. Dube, Adv.

ORDER1. In this petition counter affidavit has been filed and learned counsel for parties have agreed that petition may be decided finally at this stage. 2. The short but important and interesting question involved in this...

Ramaveer Upadhaya and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Aritlces 19(1), 21 and 226; National Security Act, 1980; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985

Reported in : AIR1996All131

Advocate for Appellant : H.P. Dube and ;L.P. Naithani, Advs.

ORDER1. In the aforesaid petitions common questions of law and facts are involved, therefore, the said petitions were heard together.2. In the Writ Petitions Nos. 16231 of 1995, 16419 of 1995 and 16441 of 1995, petitioners...

Ram Pal Singh Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 72 (2), 86 and 89; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : I(2001)ACC372; 2001(1)AWC200

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. H.P. Dube and ;Mr. Ravi Kant, Advs.

O. P. Garg, J.1. The dispute relates to the route known as Sector-8 NOIDA, 8-10, 8-9, 5-6, 1-2, 2-15, 3-16, 3-19, 4-19, 9-20, 20-21, 25-26, 26-31, 26-30, 27-28 National Botanical Garden, Sector 38-44, 40-43, 41-42 NEPZ-Kulesra-Surajpur-Dadri...

Sanjeev Kumar and Others Vs. State Transport Authority, U.P. and Anoth ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act - 1988 - Sections 99, 100, 100(3), 104 and 104(1); Movtor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 68-F(1-C);

Reported in : AIR1995All294

Advocate for Appellant : L.P. Naithani and ;H.P. Dube, Advs.

ORDERR. A. Sharma, J.1. Hapur -- Kothor route (hereinafter referred to as the route) was notified under Chapter IV-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as the old Act) for exclusive operation of...