Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: h n salve · Page 1 of about 165 results (0.109 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 12 1996

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulkpad Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-12-1996

Subject : Environment

Acts : Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 - Sections 18

Reported in : AIR1997SC1228; JT1997(10)SC377; 1996(9)SCALE269; (1997)2SCC267; [1996]Supp9SCR982; 1997(1)LC290(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Desai, Attorney General,; N.N. Goswami,; H.N. Salve,;

ORDER1. In view of the great significance of the points involved in these matters, relating to the protection and conservation of the forests throughout the country, it was considered necessary that the Central Government as well...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 1998

Sugarcane G and S Sugars Shareholders Assocn. Vs. T.N. Pollution Contr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-15-1998

Subject : Environment

Reported in : AIR1998SC2614; JT1998(2)SC671; 1998(1)LC705(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : H.N. Salve, Sr. Adv. and; S. Muralidhr, Adv

ORDER1. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that the matter is one of public interest which does require an in-depth examination by the Court to consider the kind of order which would...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 1996

Mahabir Sugar Mills Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-27-1996

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1971

Reported in : JT1996(10)SC270; 1996(6)SCALE651; (1996)10SCC259; [1996]Supp5SCR229

Advocate for Appellant : H.N. Salve,; D. Dave,; B. Sen,;

ORDERIn C.A. Nos. 2576-77/81, 347/86, W.P. No. 7535-36/85 and CMP No. 18628/86 In CA. No. 1292/86.1. These matters are disposed of together. We need not elaborately mention the facts leading to filing of these appeals and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 12 2001

State Bank of India Vs. Anjan Sanyal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-12-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; State Bank of India Act, 1955 - Sections 43(1); State Bank of India Officers Service Rules - Rules 47, 49, 50, 66 and 67

Reported in : AIR2001SC1748; [2001(90)FLR14]; JT2001(5)SC203; 2001LabIC1698; (2001)ILLJ1687SC; 2001(3)SCALE329; (2001)5SCC508; [2001]2SCR1165; 2001(2)SCT817(SC); 2001(3)SLJ270(SC); (2001

Advocate for Appellant : H.N. Salve, Solicitor General,; Rajeev Dhavan, Sr. Adv.,; Sanj

Pattanaik,J.1. The State Bank of India is in appeal against the judgment of the Division of Calcutta High Court. The Division Bench upheld the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the said High Court, who...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2003

Fatima Mohd. AmIn (Dead) Through Lr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-16-2003

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 2003(85)ECC723; (2003)7SCC436

Advocate for Appellant : H.N. Salve, Sr. Adv.,; Girish Pikale,; S.Y. Chitale,;

ORDER1. The son of the appellant herein, namely, Syed Murtuza Hussain Babamiya was convicted on 30th September, 1968 in a Customs case for smuggling of gold and was sentenced to six months rigorous imprisonment and fine...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 1996

Murari and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-01-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 11, 11(1), 11A, 16, 18, 23, 23(1) and 48; Constitution of India - Article 31A and 31(2); Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 15, 55, 55(1) and 55(2); Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1967; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1967;

Reported in : 1996VIIIAD(SC)577; JT1996(9)SC742; 1996(8)SCALE105; (1997)1SCC15; [1996]Supp8SCR313

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Venugopal,; G.L. Sanghi,; H.N. Salve,;

Faizan Uddin, J.Leave granted.1. The appellants in the appeals enumerated herein above had challenged the acquisition proceedings in respect of their respective lands acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for purposes of Planned development of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 1988

Sushil Kumar and anr Vs. Ram Prakash and ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-13-1988

Subject : Family

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 38 and 41

Reported in : AIR1988SC576; JT1988(1)SC387; 1988(1)SCALE80; (1988)2SCC77; [1988]2SCR623

Advocate for Appellant : H.N. Salve,; R.K. Garg and; N.D. Garg, Advs.

B.C. Ray, J.1. The defendant-respondent No. 1, Ram Parkash as Karta of joint Hindu family executed an February 7, 1978 an agreement to sell the suit property bearing M.C.K. No. 2 38/9, in Mohalla Qanungaon at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 1997

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay Etc. Vs. M/S. Podar Cement Pvt. Ltd ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-27-1997

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 22, 24, 27, 56, 64(2), 69(D), 93(2), 94(4), 154, 256, 257 and 288; Finance Act, 1987; Registration Act; Gift Tax Act - Sections 2; Old Income Tax Act - Sections 9 (1); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 14, 54, 55 and 269; Pakistan (Administration of Evacuee Property) Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 6(1); Rajasthan Land and Building Tax Act, 1964; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act - Sections 29(2)

Reported in : AIR1997SC2523; [1997]226ITR625(SC); JT1997(5)SC529; 1997(4)SCALE271; (1997)5SCC482; [1997]Supp1SCR394

Advocate for Appellant : K.N. Shukla,; R. Sathish,; K.N. Nagpal and;

ORDERK. Venkataswami. J.1. In all these cases the scope of Section 22 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the 'Act') arises for consideration.2. Brief facts are necessary to appreciate the question that arises for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 1997

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Podar Cement (P) Ltd. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-27-1997

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1997)141CTR(SC)67

K. VENKATASWAMI, J. :In all these cases the scope of s. 22 of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the Act) arises for consideration.2. Brief facts are necessary to appreciate the question that arises for our...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 1998

Rakesh Chander Rastogi Vs. Appropriate Authority

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-16-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [1999]106TAXMAN52(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Jagjit Singh,;for the Petitioner.; R. D. Jolly and; Ajay Jh

Lahoti, J.The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 31-7-1995 passed by the appropriate authority, Income-tax department, New Delhi, under section 269UD(I) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act'), ordering to purchase by the Central...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial