Advanced Search Results
T.N. Godavarman Thirumulkpad Vs. Union of India and Others
Supreme Court of India
Dec-12-1996
Environment
Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 - Sections 18
AIR1997SC1228; JT1997(10)SC377; 1996(9)SCALE269; (1997)2SCC267; [1996]Supp9SCR982; 1997(1)LC290(SC)
Ashok Desai, Attorney General,; N.N. Goswami,; H.N. Salve,;
ORDER1. In view of the great significance of the points involved in these matters, relating to the protection and conservation of the forests throughout the country, it was considered necessary that the Central Government as well...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSugarcane G and S Sugars Shareholders Assocn. Vs. T.N. Pollution Contr ...
Supreme Court of India
Jan-15-1998
Environment
AIR1998SC2614; JT1998(2)SC671; 1998(1)LC705(SC)
H.N. Salve, Sr. Adv. and; S. Muralidhr, Adv
ORDER1. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that the matter is one of public interest which does require an in-depth examination by the Court to consider the kind of order which would...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahabir Sugar Mills Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-27-1996
Civil
Uttar Pradesh Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1971
JT1996(10)SC270; 1996(6)SCALE651; (1996)10SCC259; [1996]Supp5SCR229
H.N. Salve,; D. Dave,; B. Sen,;
ORDERIn C.A. Nos. 2576-77/81, 347/86, W.P. No. 7535-36/85 and CMP No. 18628/86 In CA. No. 1292/86.1. These matters are disposed of together. We need not elaborately mention the facts leading to filing of these appeals and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State Bank of India Vs. Anjan Sanyal and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-12-2001
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226; State Bank of India Act, 1955 - Sections 43(1); State Bank of India Officers Service Rules - Rules 47, 49, 50, 66 and 67
AIR2001SC1748; [2001(90)FLR14]; JT2001(5)SC203; 2001LabIC1698; (2001)ILLJ1687SC; 2001(3)SCALE329; (2001)5SCC508; [2001]2SCR1165; 2001(2)SCT817(SC); 2001(3)SLJ270(SC); (2001
H.N. Salve, Solicitor General,; Rajeev Dhavan, Sr. Adv.,; Sanj
Pattanaik,J.1. The State Bank of India is in appeal against the judgment of the Division of Calcutta High Court. The Division Bench upheld the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the said High Court, who...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFatima Mohd. AmIn (Dead) Through Lr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-16-2003
Customs
2003(85)ECC723; (2003)7SCC436
H.N. Salve, Sr. Adv.,; Girish Pikale,; S.Y. Chitale,;
ORDER1. The son of the appellant herein, namely, Syed Murtuza Hussain Babamiya was convicted on 30th September, 1968 in a Customs case for smuggling of gold and was sentenced to six months rigorous imprisonment and fine...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMurari and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-01-1996
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 11, 11(1), 11A, 16, 18, 23, 23(1) and 48; Constitution of India - Article 31A and 31(2); Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 15, 55, 55(1) and 55(2); Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1967; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1967;
1996VIIIAD(SC)577; JT1996(9)SC742; 1996(8)SCALE105; (1997)1SCC15; [1996]Supp8SCR313
K.K. Venugopal,; G.L. Sanghi,; H.N. Salve,;
Faizan Uddin, J.Leave granted.1. The appellants in the appeals enumerated herein above had challenged the acquisition proceedings in respect of their respective lands acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for purposes of Planned development of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSushil Kumar and anr Vs. Ram Prakash and ors
Supreme Court of India
Jan-13-1988
Family
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 38 and 41
AIR1988SC576; JT1988(1)SC387; 1988(1)SCALE80; (1988)2SCC77; [1988]2SCR623
H.N. Salve,; R.K. Garg and; N.D. Garg, Advs.
B.C. Ray, J.1. The defendant-respondent No. 1, Ram Parkash as Karta of joint Hindu family executed an February 7, 1978 an agreement to sell the suit property bearing M.C.K. No. 2 38/9, in Mohalla Qanungaon at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax, Bombay Etc. Vs. M/S. Podar Cement Pvt. Ltd ...
Supreme Court of India
May-27-1997
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 22, 24, 27, 56, 64(2), 69(D), 93(2), 94(4), 154, 256, 257 and 288; Finance Act, 1987; Registration Act; Gift Tax Act - Sections 2; Old Income Tax Act - Sections 9 (1); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 14, 54, 55 and 269; Pakistan (Administration of Evacuee Property) Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 6(1); Rajasthan Land and Building Tax Act, 1964; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act - Sections 29(2)
AIR1997SC2523; [1997]226ITR625(SC); JT1997(5)SC529; 1997(4)SCALE271; (1997)5SCC482; [1997]Supp1SCR394
K.N. Shukla,; R. Sathish,; K.N. Nagpal and;
ORDERK. Venkataswami. J.1. In all these cases the scope of Section 22 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the 'Act') arises for consideration.2. Brief facts are necessary to appreciate the question that arises for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Podar Cement (P) Ltd. Etc.
Supreme Court of India
May-27-1997
Direct Taxation
(1997)141CTR(SC)67
K. VENKATASWAMI, J. :In all these cases the scope of s. 22 of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the Act) arises for consideration.2. Brief facts are necessary to appreciate the question that arises for our...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRakesh Chander Rastogi Vs. Appropriate Authority
Delhi
Nov-16-1998
Direct Taxation
[1999]106TAXMAN52(Delhi)
Jagjit Singh,;for the Petitioner.; R. D. Jolly and; Ajay Jh
Lahoti, J.The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 31-7-1995 passed by the appropriate authority, Income-tax department, New Delhi, under section 269UD(I) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act'), ordering to purchase by the Central...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »