Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: h m choksi · Page 1 of about 0 results (0.089 seconds)

Sep 09 1968

Manshankar Prabhashanker Dwivedi and anr. Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-09-1968

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21(9), 21(12) and 161; ;Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1); Bombay Civil Services Conduct and Discipline Rules - Rule 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : AIR1970Guj97

Advocate for Appellant : H.M. Choksi, Adv. for; G.A. Pandit, Adv.

Sarela, J.(1) The appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 486/66, Manshankar Pabhashankar Dwivedi (hereinafter referred to as accused No.1), was at the relevant time a senior Lecturer at the D. K. V. College, Jamnagar, which is a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 1950

In Re: Maganlal Jivabhai Patel

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-10-1950

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Preventive Detention Act, 1950- Sections 3(1), 3(2) and 7; Constitution of India - Article 22(5), 22(6)and 246; ;Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 97; Press (Emergency Powers) Act, 1931

Reported in : AIR1951Bom33; (1951)53BOMLR127; ILR1951Bom546

Advocate for Appellant : K.T. Sule and ;H.S. Bhat, Advs.;H.M. Choksi, Govt. Pleader

Bavdekar, J. 1. This is an appln. under Section 491, Criminal P. C. & Article 226 of the Constitution by a person, who has been detained by an order made by the Dist. Mag. Ahmedabad, on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 1953

Cantonment Board, Poona Vs. Western India theatres Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-10-1953

Subject : ConstitutionOther Taxes

Acts : Government of India Act, 1935; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 245 and 265; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 60, 60(1), 73 and 103; Government of India Act, 1861 - Sections 42; Validity of Bombay District Municipal Act, 1901 - Sections 59(1) and 60(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1935 - Sections 14; Finance (New Duties) Act, 1916; Punjab Urban Immoveable Property Tax Act, 1940; Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923

Reported in : AIR1954Bom261; (1954)56BOMLR45; ILR1954Bom647

Advocate for Appellant : H.M. Choksi, Govt. Pleader in F.A. No. 742 of 1951, ;V.M. Tarkunde and ;S.B. Tarkunde, Advs.

Bavdekar, J.1. These two appeals arise from two companion suits filed by the plaintiffs who are lessees of certain theatres situated within the limits of Poona and of two theatres known as West-End and Capitol situated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Mar 10 1953

The State Vs. Mansi Karamsi

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-10-1953

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 61 and 61(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : AIR1954Bom55; (1953)55BOMLR717; ILR1953Bom1278

Advocate for Appellant : H.M. Choksi, Govt. Pleader

Chainani, J.1. This is an appeal by the State of Bombay. The opponent owns a grocery shop within Thana municipal limits. In this shop he used to store and keep for sale ghee made from milk....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 29 1953

The State of Bombay Vs. Nilkanth Shripad Bhave and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-29-1953

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 435, 439 and 561A

Reported in : AIR1954Bom65; (1953)55BOMLR838; ILR1954Bom148

Advocate for Appellant : M.P. Amin, Adv. General and ;H.M. Choksi, Govt. Pleader

Chagla, C.J. 1. This is an application by the State of Bombay to expunge certain remarks made by the Sessions Judge, North Satara, when dealing with a bail application. The remarks that were made by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 1949

In Re: Wasudeo Narayan Phadnis and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-02-1949

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 203, 253, 259, 369, 403, 436 and 439

Reported in : AIR1950Bom10

Advocate for Appellant : H.M. Choksi, Government Pleader;V.J. Gharpure, Adv.

Chainani, J.1. The facts of this case are simple. A complaint was filed against the three applicants under Section 500, Penal Code, on 7th May 1948, in the Court of the City Magistrate, First Class, Jalgaon....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 1953

State of Bombay Vs. Vishwakant Shrikant

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-17-1953

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5, 6, 6(1) and 6(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 5(2), 19, 161 and 165; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 197 and 197(1)

Reported in : AIR1954Bom109; (1953)55BOMLR719

Advocate for Appellant : H.M. Choksi, Govt. Pleader

Bavdekar, J.1. This is an application for revision of an order passed by the Special Judge, Greater Bombay, that the proceedings, which were before him in regard to an offence under Section 161 of the Penal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 14 1949

Ali Ahmed Vs. the Collector of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-14-1949

Subject : Direct TaxationCriminal

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 46(2); Bombay City Land Revenue Act, 1876 - Sections 13 and 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Presidency Towns Insolvency Act - Sections 17 and 49; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 491; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 226

Reported in : AIR1950Bom33

Advocate for Appellant : H.M. Seervai, Adv. and N.A. Palkhiwalla and Mehta Lalji & Co.;C.K. Daphtary, Adv. General and ;H.M. Choksi, Government Pleader

Chainani, J.1. This is an application under Section 491, Criminal P. C., for directions of the nature of habeas corpus. The applicant was carrying on business in Bombay in the name of Interseas Corporation as the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 1950

Province of Bombay Vs. Madhukar Ganpat Nerlekar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-20-1950

Subject : Service

Acts : Government of India (Amendment) Act, 1935 - Sections 33(2), 179(8) and 240 to 263; Bombay District Police Act, 1890 - Sections 27 and 29(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 and 80; Bombay District Police Rules - Rules 1278, 1278(6), 1278(7), 1278(10), 1278(11), 1281, 1284, 1284(8), 1284(9) and 1284(10); Constitution of India - Article 311; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147 and 332; Bombay District Municipal Act, 1902; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 96B; Government of India (Amendment) Act, 1919; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act - Sections 58

Reported in : AIR1952Bom37; (1951)53BOMLR754; ILR1952Bom269

Advocate for Appellant : K.G. Datar, Adv. for ;H.M. Choksi, Govt. Pleader

Vyas, J.[1] These are two appeals arising out of civil suit No. 1483 of 1945 of the Court of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Poona, One of them (No. 31 of 1948) is filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 1951

The State of Bombay Vs. Narasu Appa Mali

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-24-1951

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriages Act, 1946 - Sections 4, 5, 6, 7 and 9; Constitution of India - Articles 13(1), 13(2), 13(3), 14, 15, 15(1), 25, 25(1), 25(2), 44, 372(1) and 372(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 494; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 112; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 292

Reported in : AIR1952Bom84; (1951)53BOMLR779; ILR1951Bom775

Advocate for Appellant : C.K. Daphtary, Solicitor General, ;H.M. Choksi, Govt. Pleader and ;G.N. Joshi, Adv.

Chagla, C.J.[1] These two appeals and one application for revision and one reference raise the same question with regard to the validity of the Bombay Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriages Act, 1946. In appeal No. 331...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Next ›
Last »

Advanced Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.