Advanced Search Results

Uttar Pradesh State Bridge Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : (2002)(146)ELT303Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The two applications are for restoration of the appeals before the Tribunal, which were dismissed on 25.1.1999 by the Tribunal on merits.2. Appeal E4393/95 is sought to be restored on the ground that the Tribunal...

Gkb Opthalmic Ltd. Vs. V. Acc, Goa and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1996(84)ELT415(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri H.K. Maingi, Adv.

ORDER1. 1. Learned counsel waives notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent heard forthwith. The petitioner was directed to pay an amount of Rs. 1,43,901/- towards the customs duty for the Opthalmic Lenses. The order...

Fabril Gasosa Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1997LC545(Bombay); 1997(96)ELT241(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri H.K. Maingi, Adv.

Chapalgaonkar, J. 1. This petition raises a question whether the rule of limitation as contained in Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, is applicable for an application under Rule 57-I of the Central Excise...

Goa Electricals and Fans Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commr. of C. Ex., Panaji.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35(A) and (F)

Reported in : 1998(98)ELT85(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri H.K. Maingi, Adv.

ORDERBatta, J. 1. Heard. Rule. 2. In these petitions the impugned orders were passed on 28th November, 1996 and 14th October, 1996, respectively, and the petitioners had Bled appeals along with applications under Section 35F of...

U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(90)ECC800; 2003(157)ELT267(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : H.K. Maingi, Adv.

P.V. Hardas, J. 1. The petitioner prays for quashing and setting aside the Order, dated 5th March 1999 [2000 (116) E.L.T. 296 Tri, to the extent the Tribunal dismissed the Appeal No. E/4388/95 and for quashing...

ifb Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 1995 - Rule 6(1)

Reported in : 2007(211)ELT366(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : H.K. Maingi, Adv.

ORDER1. Heard. As the petition can be disposed of at the stage of admission itself, as far as respondent No. 2 is concerned being a formal party he need not be served for the purpose of...

De Nora India Ltd (Formerly Known as Titanor Components Ltd Vs. Commis ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr H.K. Maingi, Advocate. Dr.T.Tiju, SDR.

Per. P.G. Chacko 1. In this appeal filed by the assessee, the short question arising for consideration is whether the erection and commissioning charges collected by the assessee from their buyers in respect of the goods...

Sesa Goa Limited and Others Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Central Excis ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Shri H.K. Maingi, Advocate with Shri C.S. Biradar, Advocate for the appellants. Shri S.S.Katiyar, Authorised Representative (SDR) for the respondent.

Per: P.G. Chacko: In this batch of appeals filed by exporters of iron ore, who were not agreeable for payment of export duty on the FOB value of the goods without deduction of the duty element...

Modi Gas and Chemicals Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1986)(6)LC366Tri(Delhi)

1. This is an Application for Stay of the operation of the Order-in-Original No. 10/Collr/1984, dated 23-5-1984 and dispensing with the pre-deposit and penalty imposed under the said Order upon the Applicant in terras of S....