Advanced Search Results
Gill and Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. Shri Madhav Mills Ltd.
Mumbai
Oct-21-1969
Company
(1970)72BOMLR679
Vimadalal, J.1. This matter has come up for public examination of (1) Hari das Mundhra, (2) Daulat Singhi, (8) Nandlal More, (4) Shivbux Mohatta and (5) Herbert Hill, directors of Shri Madhav Mills Ltd., which is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSamarjit Ghose Vs. Aswini Kumar Mitra
Kolkata
May-03-1988
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 151 - Order 41, Rule 22; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5
(1988)2CALLT312(HC)
H.K. Ganguly, Adv.
Samir Kumar Mookherjee, J.1. This is an application on behalf of the respondent in an appeal which had been disposed of by a learned Judge of this Court on 8th January, 1979 by a judgment in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPravIn Sankalchand Shah Vs. D.B. Dalal (Official Liquiddator)
Mumbai
Jul-07-1965
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 477 and 543
[1967]37CompCas317(Bom)
Ajit Mehta, Adv.
1. The facts giving rise to the present judge's summons dated 11th June, 1965, taken out by the applicant, Pravin Sankalchand Shah, for vacating the order passed by this court on 2nd March, 1963, directing private...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax, Bombay City I Vs. Ramgopal Ganpatr ...
Mumbai
Mar-28-1971
Direct Taxation
Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940 - Sections 4 and 5
[1972]85ITR272(Bom)
R.J. Joshi, Adv.;Kaka, Adv.
Mody, J.1. This is a reference under section 66 (1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, read with section 21 of the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940. The assessee is a private limited company. The assessments...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOfficial Liquidator, Nagpur Glass Works Ltd. Vs. (In Liquidation) V.D. ...
Mumbai
Feb-25-1970
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 48, 115, 235, 477, 477(5), 477(6), 478, 488, 534 and 543
(1971)73BOMLR333; [1971]41CompCas524(Bom); 1970MhLJ686
B.A. Masodkar, Adv. for the official liquidator
Nain, J.1. These are two applications for the renovation of the ex parte order dated 27th August 1969, for the examination of the directors of the Nagpur Glass Works Ltd. - a company under winding-up under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUltra Chemical Industries Vs. Kishore Industrial Fine Chemical Works
Mumbai
Apr-04-1972
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 and 151
1973MhLJ588
V.T. Walavalkar and ;R.T. Walawakar, Advs.
ORDER1. This revision application has been filed by the defendants against the order dated 26th August, 1971 made by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thana, refusing to hear them to show cause against an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMarigold Leasing (India) Ltd. Vs. Shashi Bhushan
Punjab and Haryana
Dec-15-2008
Company
[2009]150CompCas381(P& H); [2009]90SCL229(Punj& Har)
ORDERK. Kannan, J.(I) Scope of Enquiry in Appeal1. The issue involved in the Company Appeal is whether the Company Court exercising jurisdiction in an application under Sections 433,434 and 439 of the Companies Act, has the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWorkmen of Brahmputra Tea Estate, Represented by Assam Chah Karamchari ...
Supreme Court of India
Sep-25-1967
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 18 and 25FF; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1956; ;Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1957
AIR1968SC514; [1967(15)FLR390]; (1969)IILLJ685SC; [1968]1SCR626
Vaidialingam, J. 1. This appeal, by special leave, by the workmen of Brahmaputra Tea Estate, is directed against the award, dated February 18, 1965, of the Labour Court, Assam, in Reference No. 38 of 1962, holding...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Indo Burma Wood Products (P) Ltd.
Kolkata
Apr-24-1967
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 137, 448, 449, 456, 456(1A) and 456(1B) and 463; ;Companies (Court) Rules - Rule 233
AIR1968Cal198
S.B. Mukherjee, amicus curie
P.B. Mukharji, J.1. A very important question arises on this application for direction by the Official Liquidator in the company matter Re Indo Burma Wood Products (P) Ltd.2. Before setting out the point for determination, it...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.k.sharma & Anr. Vs.nemo
Delhi
Jan-25-2017
Right to Information
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : January 25, 2017 CO.APP. 1/2017 V.K SHARMA AND ANR ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr.Deepak Khosla, Advocate. NEMO versus Represented by:...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›