Advanced Search Results

Sri Poojari Peddanna Vs. the State of Karnataka Rep. by Its Secretary, ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 - Sections 1(3), 2(1), 2(6), 2(7), 4(1), 4(1A), 5A, 6, 12, 28, 28(1), 28(2), 28(3), 28(4) and 45; Karnataka Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 - Sections 4(2); Land Reforms Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1); Karnataka Industries (Facilitation) Act, 2002 - Sections 6(2); Karnataka Land Reforms Act - Sections 109; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 32, Rules 1 and 2; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 300A; Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Regulations, 1969 - Regulation 4

Reported in : ILR2009KAR1789; 2009(5)KarLJ556

Advocate for Appellant : H. Mohan Kumar and ;Navkesh Batra, Advs. for ;Nandi Law Chambers, ;K. Subramanyam, ;T.N. Venkat Reddy, Advs.

ORDERAshok B. Hinchigeri, J.1. The acquisition of land vide preliminary Notification, dated 2nd June, 2006 and final Notification (declaration), dated 16th August, 2006 under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (hereinafter called 'the KIAD Act' for...

Buddhu Lal Vs. Raja Pertabgir

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Lamitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19 and 20

Reported in : AIR1961AP467

Advocate for Appellant : H.G. Kulkarni, Adv. for ;Venkat Rao, Adv.

Manohar Pershad, J. 1. This appeal on behalf of the decree-holder arises out of the execution proceeding started by him. The decree-holder filed a suit against the respondent-judgment debtor for a sum of Rs. 3319-11-0 on...

NazeeruddIn Vs. Ram Devi

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 and 152; ;Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR1976AP50

Advocate for Appellant : H.G. Kulkarni, Adv.

ORDER1. The question which arise in this Civil Revision is whether the Court can amend under Section 152 Civil P.C. the judgment and decree granting specific performance, when it had entitled to specify the time before...

Y. Yadaiah Vs. B. Balapershad

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 7 - Order 9, Rules 6, 7 and 13

Reported in : AIR1978AP395

Advocate for Appellant : H.G. Kulkarni, Adv.

ORDER1. This is a revision filed by the defendant against the order of the Additional Chief judge, City Civil Court, dated 8th Feb. 1977 in c. M. A. No. 23 of 1976 allowing the appeal filed...

Kripa Printing Press, Putli Bowli, Hyderabad by Yeshwant Rao Vs. Presi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1960AP489; [1960(1)FLR450]; (1960)ILLJ53AP

Advocate for Appellant : D.M. Deshmukh and ;H.G. Kulkarni, Advs.

ORDERBhimasankaram, J.1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution for the issue of a writ of certiorari quashing the order of the Labour Court, Hyderabad dated the 23rd December 1958. One of the...

C. Kenchappa and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(2), 21, 32, 41, 47, 48-A, 51-A, 226 and 253; Karnataka Industries Areas Development Act, 1966 - Sections 3(1) and 47; Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 71, 95 and 97; Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 14-A, 15 and 24; Pollution Control Act, 1986 - Sections 13, 14 and 41; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 - Sections 28; Constitution (Forty second Amendment) Act, 1976; Himachal Pradesh Municipal Act - Sections 256; Gujarat Industrial Development Act, 1962 - Sections 16; U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 3 and 11-F; Orissa Municipal Act - Sections 417-A

Reported in : 2000(4)KarLJ1

Advocate for Appellant : Sri B.L. Acharya ;for Sri H. Kumara Swamy, Adv.

ORDER1. This writ petition is filed as a public interest litigation by the inhabitants of Hoodi, Pattandur, Nallurahalli and Kundalahalli villages of K.R. Puram Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, questioning the validity of the notification issued under...

Amritlal Kaushik and anr. Vs. R.S.E.B. and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1991(2)WLC507; 1991(1)WLN12

J.R. Chopra, J.1. These two writ petitions raise common questions of facts and law and, therefore, they were heard together and are being decided by a common order.2. The facts, necessary to be noticed for the...

Amritlal and anr. Vs. R.S.E.B. and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1991(2)WLN1

J.R. Chopra, J.1. These two writ petitions raise common questions of facts and law and, therefore, they were heard together and are being decided by a common order.2. The facts, necessary to be noticed for the...