Advanced Search Results
R.G. Devadhar Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-09-1986
ConstitutionService
Karnataka Law Officers (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1977 - Rule 23; ;Constitution of India - Article 14, 162, 226 and 300A; Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 48A
ILR1986KAR4095
H.B. Datar, Sr. Adv. and Amicus Curiae
ORDERK.A. Swami, J.1. In all these petitions, the petitioners were High Court Government Pleaders at the relevant point of time. They have sought for quashing the amendment to the Karnataka Law Officers (Appointment and Conditions of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Muddureshwara Mining Industries Vs. P.G.R. ScIndia and Others
Karnataka
Jun-25-1993
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 131, 226 and 245 ; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 15; Karnataka Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 1969 - Rules 3, 3-A, 4, 20 and 66; Oilfields (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948 - Sections 6-A(4)
AIR1993Kant346; ILR1993KAR1967; 1993(3)KarLJ108
Mr. P. Chidambaram and ;Mr. H.B. Datar, Sr. Advs, ;Mr. M.R. Achar, ;Mr. D.L.N. Rao, ;Mr. K.B. Shivakumar and ;Law Associates, Advs.
1. All these appeals except Appeal No. 1022/1992 are preferred against the order dated 13-3-1992 passed by the learned single Judge in W. P. No. 14241 of 1991 and W. P. No. 14783 of 1991. W.A....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVidyavathi Kapoor Trust Vs. Chief Commissioner of Income-tax and Other ...
Karnataka
Aug-23-1991
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 5(3), 22, 34, 34(1), 62, 127, 127(1), 147, 148(2), 160, 161, 164, 166, 269, 269(2), 269UA, 269UA(1), 269UB, 269UC, 269UD, 269UD(1), 269UD(2), 269UE, 269UF, 269UF(1), 269UG, 269UG(1), 269UH, 269UH(1), 269UJ, 269UL, 269UL(3), 269UN and 282(2)
(1991)99CTR(Kar)269; ILR1991KAR3414; [1992]194ITR584(KAR); [1992]194ITR584(Karn)
H.B. Datar, Adv.
S. Mohan, C.J.1. These two appeals arise out of the judgment of our learned brother Rajasekhara Murthy J., dated April 19, 1991, rendered in Writ Petition No. 6655 of 1991. 2. We will refer to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Chairman, Bda Vs. Shivanna
Karnataka
Mar-30-1992
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 47, Rule 1; Karnataka High Court Rules, 1959 - Rule 5; Writ Proceedings Rules, 1977 - Rule 39; Bangalore Development Authority Act - Sections 17(1) and 17(5)
ILR1992KAR1504; 1992(3)KarLJ96
H.B. Datar, Sr. Adv. for ;N.S. Srinivasan, Adv.
ORDERRama Jois, J.1. The facts of this Review Petition show how inadvertance, negligence and dereliction of duty on the part of the Advocate appearing for a public authority and the officers of the Authority could create...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShankarappa Vs. Puttamma
Karnataka
Mar-11-1987
CivilTenancy
Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 - Sections 10, 21 and 21(1) - Rule 14; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1980 - Sections 7 and 23 - Order 18, Rule 13 - Order 20, Rules 4(1), 4(2) - Orders 50
ILR1987KAR1145
H.B. Datar, Senior Adv.
ORDERMurlidher Rao, J.1. This is a tenant's revision petition challenging the decree for eviction, under Clauses (f) and (h) of Section 21(1) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, in HRC No. 1273 of 1973 (renumbered as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD.P. Sharma Vs. Bangalore Mahanagara Palike and Others
Karnataka
Jun-12-2001
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 23, Rule 1(2) and (3) - Order 32, Rules 1 to 14; Constitution of India - Article 226; High Court of Karnataka Writ Proceedings Rules, 1977 - Rule 39
AIR2001Kant401; 2001(4)KarLJ132
Sri H.B. Datar, Senior Counsel ;for Sri K.S. Desai
ORDERChidananda Ullal, J.1. This writ appeal is directed against the orders dated 23-8-2000 in W.P. No. 10256 of 1990 passed by the learned Single Judge, in passing whereof, the learned Single Judge in entertaining a memo...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ. Hiralal Vs. Gulabchand
Karnataka
Jan-28-1982
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 35, 115 and 115(1) - Order 6, Rule 17
AIR1983Kant30
H.B. Datar, Adv. for ;P. Srinivasacharya, Adv.
ORDER1. At the stage of admission, the respondent is notified. Accordingly he has put in appearance through a counsel. Hence the matter is taken up for final hearing itself.2. This Civil Revision Petition is preferred against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR. Siddananjappa Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Feb-08-1985
Civil
Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1971 - Sections 10 and 18 - Rule 27(1)
ILR1985KAR2631; 1985(1)KarLJ237
H.B. Datar, Adv.
ORDERPutlaswamy, J.1.In this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged order No. HD 44 CNL 84 dated l0-10-1984 (Annexure D) of Government.2. On 6-12-1980 the petitioner made an application before the District...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSouthern Steelmet and Alloys Ltd. Vs. Lakshmi Nivas Mittal and ors.
Karnataka
Aug-20-1985
Company
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order I, Rule 8
[1986]60CompCas132(Kar); ILR1985KAR3091; 1986(1)KarLJ47
H.B. Datar, Adv.
N. Venkatachala, J.1. By consent of learned counsel, this revision petition was treated as having been posted for hearing and heard. 2. The petitioner, a company, was defendant No. 1 in a suit, O.S. No. 3288...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubhash Tukaram Sangaonkar Vs. State of Karnataka and Another
Karnataka
Jul-03-1997
Constitution
Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 - Sections 42(9) and 322; Mysore Town Municipalities Act - Sections 27(3); Constitution of India - Article 226
ILR1997KAR2607; 1998(2)KarLJ26
H.B. Datar, Senior Counsel, ;Sri Basavaprabhu S. Patil and ;Sri G. Balalkrishna Shahstry, Advs.
ORDER1. In all these writ petitions the resolution dated 14-5-1997, removing the President and the Vice-President of the City Municipal Council, Nippani by passing a no confidence motion has been challenged.2. The total strength of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »