Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: h b agrawal · Page 1 of about 47 results (0.062 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 04 1998

Bhagwani Sahu Vs. Vijay Kumar Mohanty and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-04-1998

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2000ACJ1240

Advocate for Appellant : H.B. Agrawal, Adv.

Dipak Misra, J. 1. The moot question that arises for consideration in this appeal preferred under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is whether grant of compensation in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 1999

Arun Chauhan Vs. Sakharam and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-08-1999

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2001ACJ1187

Advocate for Appellant : H.B. Agrawal, Adv.

Dipak Misra, J. 1. In this appeal preferred under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short 'the Act') the claimant appellant has called in question the sustainability of the award passed on 25.11.1994...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 2002

Smt. Jaya Chandrakar Vs. Distt. Panchayat and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Sep-13-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Shiksha Karmis (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1997 - Rule 12; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat (Appeal and Revision) Rules, 1995 - Rule 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2003(1)MPHT43(CG)

Advocate for Appellant : H.B. Agrawal and; Ajay Shrivastava, Advs.

ORDERFakhruddin, J.1. Being aggrieved against the judgment and decree dated 19-12-2000 passed by Vth Additional District Judge, Durg, in Civil Appeal No. 14-A of 1999 arising out of Civil Suit No. 7-A/98 decided by the 1st...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 08 2000

Abhay Kumar Kothari Vs. Arun Kumar Jain

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-08-2000

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 6, Rule 17; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 12, 16 and 21; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73

Reported in : 2001(1)MPHT249

Advocate for Appellant : Shri H.B. Agrawal, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J. 1. Invoking the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') the defendant/petitioner has called in question the legal validity of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 2001

Gokul Prasad Vs. Chunnilal and Another

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : May-09-2001

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 and 115 - Order 21, Rules 97, 98 and 102

Reported in : 2001(3)MPHT32(CG)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri H.B. Agrawal, Adv.

ORDERR.S. Garg, J. 1. When the decree passed in favour of respondent No. 1/decrcc holder was put into execution, the present applicant made an application under Rules 97/98 of Order 21 of the Code of Civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 1998

Harishankar Patel Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-20-1998

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1994 - Sections 39(1) and 40; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 39

Reported in : 1999(1)MPLJ217

Advocate for Appellant : H.B. Agrawal, Adv.

ORDERD.P.S. Chauhan, J.1. The petitioner was suspended from the office of the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Mokhaputka, Block and Tahsil Saraipali, District Raipur in exercise of the power under Section 39 of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 1998

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. ShamsuddIn and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-02-1998

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1999ACJ838

Advocate for Appellant : H.B. Agrawal, Adv.

S.K. Dubey, J.1. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. has filed this appeal aggrieved of the award dated 20.4.1989 passed in M.V. Case No. 56 of 1985 by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Seoni.2. The manner and circumstances...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 2001

Bhupendra Singh Babara and Another Vs. Municipal Council Ambikapur and ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : May-03-2001

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 35-A(2) and (6), 91 - Order 1, Rules 8 and 8(1) - Order 14 - Order 23, Rules 1(3) and 3(2); Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887

Reported in : 2001(3)MPHT80(CG)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri H.B. Agrawal, Adv.

R.S. Garg, J. 1. The plaintiffs/appellants along with the suit made an application under Order 1, Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure and also made a prayer that their suit be treated to be...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 1994

In Re: Reference U/S 113 of Civil Procedure Code by District Judge

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-13-1994

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96 and 115; Madhya Pradesh Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1994 - Sections 115; Madhya Pradesh Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 115

Reported in : 1995(0)MPLJ94

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Kale, ;Ravish Agrawal, ;R.S. Tiwari, ;Deepak Verma, ;H.B. Agrawal and ;R.P. Jain, Advs.;A. Choudhary, Addl. Adv. General

ORDERU.L. Bhat, C.J.1. This reference is made by the District Judge, Jabalpur under Section 113 of the Code of Civil Procedure. We issued notices to the Advocate General, High Court Bar Association and the Jabalpur District...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 1998

Smt. Sudha Tripathi Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-07-1998

Subject : Commercial

Acts : State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29

Reported in : AIR1999MP188

Advocate for Appellant : H.S. Agrawal, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for quashment of Annexure P-10 agreement entered into by Madhya Pradesh Financial Corporation (hereinafter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial