Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: gopinath · Page 1 of about 13,234 results (0.524 seconds)

Mar 22 2006

Balasubramanian Vs. Chandradas

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-22-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Municipality Act, 1994 - Sections 4, 5, 6, 9, 10(2), 10(4), 11(3), 12, 12(1), 12(5), 14, 29, 43(2), 64(1A), 143(1), 143(1A) and 143(2); Constitution (Seventy Fourth) Amendment Act 1992; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 243T and 334; Kerala Municipality (Election of Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson) Rules 1998; Kerala Municipality (Election of Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson) Rules 1995 - Rule 6(3)

Reported in : 2006(2)KLT467

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Sreedharan Pillai,; K.B. Sajeesh,; P. Gopinath,

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. The cardinal question that has come up for consideration before us is whether we should issue a writ of quo warranto against a duly elected Deputy Chairperson of a Municipality on the sole...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 1994

Sethuraman Thiagarajan Engineers P. Ltd. and Others Vs. Cholamandalam ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-05-1994

Subject : Company

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 141

Reported in : [1995]83CompCas484(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : V. Gopinath, Adv.

Pratap Singh, J.1. The accused in C. C. No. 5427 of 1991 on the file of the VII the Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Madras, have filed this petition under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 1998

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Jawahar Mills Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-10-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2000]107TAXMAN574(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K. Ramasamy for the Appellant Gopinath, for the Respondent

C.A. No. 64 7 of 19901. This appeal is preferred by the complainant, Assistant Commissioner, Salem, against the order of acquittal passed in F.O.C.C. No. 341 of 1989. The case of the complainant is that the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Sep 15 2011

State of West Bengal, and ors. Vs. Debasish Mukherjee, and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-15-2011

Subject : Service

Acts : West Bengal Services Revision of Pay and Allowances Rules, 1970 ; W.B. ROPA Rules, 1990,; Career Advancement Benefit Scheme. ; West Bengal Service Rules - Rule 55(4), 49, 42 (1)(2); Constitution of India - Article 14, 229(2), ; Fundamental Rule 22(I)(a)(1); Calcutta High Court Service Rules, 1960 - Rule 23; Allahabad High Court Officers and Staff (Conditions of Service and Conduct) Rules, 1976 - Rule 41, 40(2)

1. All these appeals question the common order dated 20.1.2005 of the Calcutta High Court allowing a batch of appeals by the employees of the High Court. The facts are similar and for convenience, we will...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 2008

Rajamani Bahinipati and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-15-2008

Subject : Family

Reported in : (2008)106CALLT40(NULL)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Das

Indrajit Mahanty, J.1. In the present writ application, the Petitioner has sought to challenge the Order Dated 10.9.1991 passed by the Member, Board of Revenue, Orissa, Cuttack in O.L.R. Revision No. 14 of 1989 holding that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2000

Swamy Aroopananda Vs. Bagmisri Nilamadhaba Bramha and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : May-05-2000

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 499 and 500; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 119 and 199

Reported in : 90(2000)CLT756; 2000CriLJ4296; 2000(II)OLR159

Advocate for Appellant : D. Panda, Adv.

B.P. Das, J.1. This application is directed against the order dated 17.5.1997 passed by the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bhubaneswar, taking cognizance under Section 500, Indian Penal Code (for short the I.P.C.') against the petitioner in I.C.C.No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 2021

Mr Dhruv Palasamudram Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-08-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Nitin Ramesh

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE8H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NO.11504/2021(EDN-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NOs. 11066/2021 (EDN-CET), 11369/2021(EDN-RES), 11951/2021(EDN-RES), 12071/2021(EDN-RES),...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 2021