Advanced Search Results

State Through C.B.i. Vs. Amarmani Tripathi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 173(8), 437, 437(1) and 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 201

Reported in : AIR2005SC3490; 2005(3)BLJR2084; 2005CriLJ4149; 123(2005)DLT362(SC); 2005(85)DRJ227; JT2005(8)SC517; 2005(7)SCALE489; (2005)8SCC21; MANU/SC/0677/2005

Advocate for Appellant : Gopal Subramanium, Additional Solicitor General,; Vikas Sharma,;

Ashok Bhan, J.1. Leave granted.2. The State of Uttar Pradesh through CBI aggrieved by the orders dated 29th April, 2004 and 8th July, 2004 passed by a Single Judge of Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) in...

Manohar M. Galani Vs. Ashok N. Advani and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195

Reported in : AIR2000SC202; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)297; 2000(1)ALT(Cri)229; 2000CriLJ406; 1999(3)Crimes260(SC); (2000)3GLR2655; JT1999(9)SC142; RLW2000(1)SC113; 1999(7)SCALE141; (1999)8SCC737; [

Advocate for Appellant : Gopal Subramanium,; Kavin Gulati,; D.M. Gulani and;

G.B. Pattanaik, J.1. Leave granted.2. The order of the Gujarat High Court quashing the complaints as well as further investigation taken up by the police stations and also setting aside all the proceedings in Criminal Miscellaneous...

State of Uttaranchal and anr. Vs. Madan Mohan Joshi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Regularisation of Ad hoc Employees on the posts within the jurisdiction of the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission Rules, 1979 - Rules 3, 4(3), 5, 17(2), 20 and 25; Uttaranchal Higher Education (Group A) Service Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 309

Reported in : 2008(8)SCALE491; (2008)6SCC797; 2008AIRSCW4029

Advocate for Appellant : Gopal Subramanium, A.S.G.,; Rachana Srivastava and; Ashish J

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Inter se seniority amongst the teachers of Kumaon University is in question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 21.3.2006 passed by a Division Bench of...

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Nippon Steel Corporation Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 13, 14, 14(1), 14(2), 30, 33, 34 and 39(1); Companies Act, 1956; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 119 and 137; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 3, Rule 5; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules - Rule 786

Reported in : AIR2007SC327; 2006(4)ARBLR171(SC); 2007(1)AWC648(SC); 2007(4)BomCR233; [2006]134CompCas712(SC); JT2006(10)SC238; 2006(12)SCALE211; (2007)2SCC382

Advocate for Appellant : Gopal Subramanium, A.S.G.,; K.R. Sasiprabhu,; Sreegesh M.K.

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Leave granted.2. Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. is the appellant. Aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 6th/8th December, 2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Appeal No....

Jayendra Vishnu Thakur Vs. State of Maharahstra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1871 - Sections 3, 33, 137 and 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 82, 83, 85, 90, 273, 299, 299(1), 342 and 465; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 11, 12, 14, 14(5), 21 and 25; Extradition Act, 1962; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 512; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 26 and 172; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 32

Reported in : 2009(7)SCALE757; (2009)7SCC104(1); 2009AIRSCW3898;

Advocate for Appellant : Shekhar Nagade, Sr. Adv.,; Manoj Goel,; Shuvodeep Roy,;

ORDERAfter splitting up the case with regard to the absconding accused as per the directions of the Honourable Supreme Court in its order dated 23rd November, 1993 in petitions for Special Leave to Appeal Nos. 1643-46/93...

In the Matter of Nirmal Singh Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 229, 313, 366 and 465; Evidence Act - Sections 33; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302 and 307; Arms Act - Sections 25 and 27

Reported in : 2000CriLJ1803; [2000]2SCR807; 2000(2)LC904(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Gopal Subramanium

G.B. Pattanaik, J.1. The appellant was convicted by the learned Sessions Judge for the offence of murder under Section 302 IPC, on a finding that he shot at Surat Singh, Desh Raj, Lehna Singh and Ramesh....

State of Rajasthan Vs. Ajit Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 2(1), 3, 3(3), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 15, 15(1), 19, 21, 21(1), 21(2) and 32(1); Arms Act - Sections 25(3); Passport Act; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25 to 30; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Pass Port Rules, 1950 - Rules 3 and 6; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules, 1987 - Rule 15 and 15(5); Indian Penal Code

Reported in : 2008CriLJ364; JT2007(12)SC102; (2008)1SCC601

Advocate for Appellant : Naveen Kumar Singh,; Shashwat Gupta and; Aruneshwar Gupta

Harjit Singh Bedi, J.1. This appeal under Section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act 1987 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') has been filed against the judgment of the Designated Court dated 2nd...

Mrs. Anil Katiyar Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution Service

Reported in : 1996VIIIAD(SC)684; AIR1997SC2656; JT1996(10)SC768; 1996(8)SCALE57; (1997)1SCC280; (1996)4UPLBEC2281

ORDERS.C. Agrawal, J.1. This appeal relates to appointment on the post of Deputy Government Advocate in the Central Agency Section in the Ministry of Law of the Government of India. The appellant as well as respondent...

Secretary, Maharshi Dayanand Arya Shiksha Mahavidyalaya Vs. State of B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 1993Supp(1)SCC436

Ranganath Misra, C.J. and; M.H. Kania, J.1. Two questions arise for determination in this appeal by special leave: (1) whether the appellant institution is entitled to recognition and (2) in what way should the students who...

State (N.C.T. of Delhi) Vs. Navjot Sandhu @ Afsan Guru

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 39, 161, 161(2), 162, 162(1), 162(2), 164, 173, 196, 196(1), 215, 239 and 313; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 40, 43, 71, 107, 108 to 117, 120A, 120B, 121 to 126, 130, 186, 300, 302, 307, 332, 353 and 409; Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 3(4), 3(5), 4, 5, 5(2), 6, 20, 21, 27, 30, 32, 32(1), 32(2) to 32(5), 34, 36 to 48, 50, 50(2), 50(3), 50(4), 52, 52(1), 52(2), 52(3), 52(4) and 56; Explosive Substances Act - Sections 3, 4 and 5; Arms Act - Sections 25 and 27; Prevention of Terrorism (2nd) Ordinance, 2001; Indian Telegraph Act - Sections 5, 5(2) and 25; Constitution (69th Amendment) Act, 1991 - Sections 2; National Capital Territories of Delhi Act, 1991 - Sections 41; Industrial Disput

Reported in : AIR2005SC3820; 2005CriLJ3950; 122(2005)DLT194(SC); (2005)11SCC600; Manu/SC/0465/2005

Advocate for Appellant : Gopal Subramanium,;Shanti Bhushan; Shushil Kumar and; Ram Jet

P. Venkatarama Reddi, J.1. The genesis of this case lies in a macabre incident that took place close to the noon time on 13th December, 2001 in which five heavily armed persons practically stormed the Parliament...