Advanced Search Results

Gadakh Yashwantrao Kankarrao Vs. E.V. Alias Balasaheb Vikhe Patil and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 77, 99, 101, 116A, 123, 123(4) and 123(6)

Reported in : AIR1994SC678; JT1993(6)SC345; 1993(3)SCALE243; (1994)1SCC682; [1993]Supp3SCR731

Advocate for Appellant : V.N. Ganpule,; Ram Jethmalani,; Raja Bhosale,;

J.S. Verma, J.1. These appeals under Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as 'the R.P. Act') are against the judgment dated 30th March, 1993 in Election Petition No. 2...

Sambhaji Savkar Jadhav Vs. Insurance Regulatory and Development Author ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

Mohit S. Shah, CJ. 1. All these three petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India purporting to be public interest litigation, have been filed by the same petitioner - Sambhaji Savakar Jadhav, mainly alleging...

Vishwas Jayavantrao Bhosale Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)(3)SLJ219CAT

1. In O.A. 291/2004 (V. J. Bhosale), O.A. 308/2004 (G.B. Maware. M.K.Thombare and S.J. Koche), O.A. 335/2004 (V.R. Kale), O.A. 409/2004 (S.K. Kamble) and O.A. 486/2004 (F.V. Vesave) the relief claimed is the same and a...

Suresh Thimiri and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

P.C.: 1. The applications are moved for pre arrest bail as the applicants/accused are facing charges for the offences punishable under Sections 120(B) and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3, 5 and...

Air India Employees Union and Others Vs. Air India Limited and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. B. D'souza

M.S. Sanklecha, J. 1. These petitions are fallout of a merger of Indian Airlines Limited and Air India Limited which was done to make the national carrier more competitive and profitable in the context of open...

Shridhar Chavan Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. The appellant who was working as a Chobdar on the establishment of this Court, has appealed to this Court, challenging the judgment and order delivered by the Special Judge for Greater Mumbai appointed under Section...

Bank of Maharashtra Officers' Association, through Its Dy. Gen. Secret ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2001(3)ALLMR833; 2001(4)BomCR382; (2001)4BOMLR230; [2001(90)FLR1088]; (2001)IILLJ1533Bom; 2001(4)MhLj330

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Deshmukh for A.V. Anturkar, Adv.

H.L. Gokhale, J. 1. The petitioner, herein, is a registered Trade Union, and in this petition it is representing the Law Officers working under the first respondent Bank. The Petition seeks to espouse the cause of...

City Builders Vs. Vysya Bank Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : BankingLimitation

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(1)ALLMR188; I(2003)BC522; 2003(2)BomCR645

Advocate for Appellant : Uday Bobde, ;Vijay Tawade and ;Jose George, Advs.

C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. Rule. Mr. Girish Kulkarni appears and waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondent. In the facts and circumstances, the matter is taken up for final hearing today.2. This petition is filed...

Girish Jantilal Vaghela Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : 2003(2)SLJ140(Bombay)

Advocate for Appellant : C.U. Singh, Adv., i/b., ;Naik, Adv.

D.B. Bhosale, J. 1. Rule. By consent rule is made returnable forthwith. Mr. M.S. Karnik, learned Counsel waives service for respondent No. 1 Mr. Girish Kulkarni, learned Counsel waives services for respondent No. 2. None for...

Vinayak Hari Kulkarni, Vs. State of Maharashtra, (Summons to Be Served ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bombay Inferior Village Watan Abolition Act; Goa, Daman and Diu Reorganization Act, 1947; Goa, Daman and Diu Reorganization (Amendment) Act, 1987 - Sections 20 and 20(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 117, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127 and 129; Constitution of India - Articles 39A, 154, 225, 343 to 347, 348, 348(1), 348(2) and 350; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 477; Indian Constitutional Law; Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 - Rules 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 19 and 25; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules - Rules 620 and 611

Reported in : 2009(4)MhLj242

Advocate for Appellant : A.V. Anturkar, Adv., i/b., ;S.B. Deshmukh, Adv. for petitioner No. 1, ;S.P. Thorat, Sr. Counsel i/b., ;Patki, Adv. for petitioner No. 2 and ;S.K. Shinde, Adv. for petitioner No. 3, ;Girish Kulkarni,

S.B. Mhase, J.1. The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 6597 of 2007 has filed the Writ Petition in respect of various proceedings initiated under the Bombay Inferior Village Watan Abolition Act. Most of the annexures, including...