Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: girish desai · Page 1 of about 60 results (0.056 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 06 2003

Wali Mohammed Vs. Batulbai

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-06-2003

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 125, 125(1), 127 and 127(3); Mohammadan Law

Reported in : 2003CriLJ2755; [2003(4)JCR625(MP)]; 2003(3)MPHT113; 2003(2)MPLJ513

Advocate for Appellant : Girish Desai, Dy. Adv. General, ;H.S. Uberoi, ;B.L. Pavecha and ;Jaisingh, Sr. Advs. as Amicus Curiae

N.K. Jain, J.1. All these matters arising out of the proceedings initiated by Muslim wives against their (former) husbands for grant of maintenance allowance or recovery of the amount already awarded, under Section 125 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 1998

State of M.P. Vs. Rakesh Kumar Gupta

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-21-1998

Subject : CriminalMotor Vehicles

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 451 and 457; Madhya Pradesh Motor Yan Karadhan Adhiniyam, 1991 - Sections 16(3), 16(4), 20; Madhya Pradesh Motor Yan Karadhan Rules - Rules 16 and 17

Reported in : 1998(2)MPLJ249

Advocate for Appellant : Girish Desai, Adv.

ORDERA.R. Tiwari, J.1. 'No Light', said Milton in Paradise Lost, 'but rather darkness visible'. But Courts, determined to secure harmony and spurn antinomy between law and justice, search 'light' in lexicon of law in a surge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 2001

State of M.P. Vs. Rajeev Jain

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-20-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Judicial Officers Protection Act, 1850 - Sections 1; Judges (Protection) Act, 1985 - Sections 2; Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 47-A, 47-A(1), 47-A(6) and 47-A(8); Madhya Pradesh Stamp (Amendment) Act; Prevention of Corrpution Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109 and 120-B; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2001(4)MPHT58

Advocate for Appellant : Shri H.S. Uberoi, ;Shri Mahendra Jain and ;Shri Piyush Mathur, Advs.;Shri Girish Desai, Dy. Advocate General

ORDERN.K. Jain, J. 1. All these revisions (No. 630/1998, 18/1999 and 22/1999) arise out of the order dated 25-8-1998, passed by Special Judge, Ujjain, in Special Case No. 8/1996, discharging accused Rajeev Jain (the respondent here...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 01 2002

Gopal S/O Mohanlal Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-01-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 18, 42 and 50

Reported in : 2003(86)ECC544

Advocate for Appellant : Vivek Singh and ;Sanjay Sharma, Advs.;Girish Desai, Deputy Adv. General

S.L. Kochar, J.1. This is an appeal preferred by the appellant, against the judgment passed by Ill ASJ Mandsaur in ST No. 18/94 on 27.2.1997, thereby convicting the appellant, for the offence punishable under Section 8/18...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2005

Amritlal and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-12-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 304B and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 294 and 313

Reported in : 2006CriLJ888; I(2006)DMC630; 2006(1)MPLJ610

Advocate for Appellant : K. Vyas, Adv.

S.L. Kochar, J.1. The appellants have approached this Court being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and sentence, passed against the appellants by V Additional Sessions Judge, Indore in Sessions Trial No. 448/93 dated 29.2.1996, thereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2002

Mohinder Singh Devyal Vs. Appajeet Devyal

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-29-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : 2003(1)ALLMR1001; [2003]127TAXMAN428(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Girish Desai, for the Applicant Ms. S. Shaikh, for the Respondent

The plaintiff has filed the present suit for declaration that he is the real and beneficial owner of five fully paid-up shares held by the 1st Defendant in the Suhas Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. as well...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2015

High Court of Karnataka Vs. Sri Jai Chaitanya Dasa @ Jayanarayana K

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-16-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Dated this the 16th day of April, 2015 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA C.C.C. (CRIMINAL) No.20/2009 BETWEEN: High Court of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2015

High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore rep. by Registrar General Vs. Jai C ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-16-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: This Suo-motu Criminal Contempt of Court case is initiated under Article 215 of the Constitution of India r/w Section 15(2) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for taking appropriate action against the respondents/accused arising...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2007

Bhurji and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-15-2007

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2007CriLJ2645; 2007(1)MPLJ600

S.L. Kochar, J.1. The appellants named above being dissatisfied by the judgment dated 28-4-2001 rendered by the learned Sessions Judge. Jhabua in Sessions Trial No. 518/98 thereby finding the appellants guilty of the offences under Sections...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 2005

Radheshyam Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-08-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27, 159 and 165; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 311

Reported in : 2006(2)MPHT84

Advocate for Appellant : T.M. Panjwani, Adv.

S.L. Kochar, J.1. The appellant has preferred the aforesaid Criminal Appeal before this Court, dissatisfied with the judgment dated 22nd March, 1996 rendered in Sessions Trial No. 150/93 by Additional Sessions Judge, Kannod, District Dewas, thereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial