Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ghanshyam das · Page 1 of about 453 results (0.136 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 03 2007

Hanuman Vyas Vs. State Through the Inspector of Police, Vigilance Cell ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-03-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 6C; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD(Cri)54; 2008(1)ALT209

Advocate for Appellant : Ghanshyam Das Mandhani, Adv.

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. The matter is coming up for admission.2. Heard Sri Ghanshyam Das Mandhani, the learned Counsel representing the writ petitioner and the learned G.P. for Civil Supplies.Sri Ghanshyam Das Mandhani, the learned Counsel representing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 1987

Kalu Ram and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-09-1987

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1987(1)WLN438

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.K. Mathur, Mr. Mathur

Shyam Sunder Byas, J.1. Accused Kaluram and Dilip Kumar were convicted under Section 302/34, I.P.C. and each was sentenced to imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs. 2000/- in default of the payment of fine...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 1979

Lalji Maitra Vs. Shyam Behari Mehra and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-27-1979

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14(1) and 14(2)

Reported in : AIR1979All379

Advocate for Appellant : J.N. Chandra and ;Faujdar Rai, Advs.

S.J. Hyder, J.1. These connected appeals are directed against the judgment and decree of the Additional Civil Judge, Azamgarh, dated 22nd of Aug. 1969 passed in Original Suit No. 6 of 1964. In order to appreciate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 23 1993

Ravindra Kumar Sabu Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-23-1993

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institution Act, 1989 - Sections 9 and 43; Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions (Recognition Grant-in-aid, Service Conditions Etc.) Rules, 1993 - Rule 23

Reported in : AIR1994Raj36; 1993(2)WLC721

Advocate for Appellant : Ghanshyam Das Mundra, Adv.; R.P. Garg and C.K. Garg, Advs.

ORDERN.L. Tibrewal, J.1. Final arguments were heard on request of learned counsel for the parties in view of the urgency in the case.I wished the present litigation had been avoided and the members of 'Maheshwari Samaj'...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 1968

Manmohan Singh Johal Vs. State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-19-1968

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 196-A, 196A(1), 196A(2), 237, 342 and 537; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 460, 463, 464, 465, 466 and 471; Constitution of India - Articles 154, 154(1), 166(2) and 166(3); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 45 and 47

Reported in : AIR1969P& H225; 1969CriLJ932

Advocate for Appellant : H.L. Sibal, Sr. Adv. and; S.S. Sandhawalia, Adv.

1. Forty -four persons were committed for trial under Section 120B read with Sections 465, 466 and 471, Indian Penal Code , to the Court of Session, Jullendur, on a charge of criminal consipracy, having a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 1995

Dr. Rakesh Kumar Singh and Others Vs. Banaras Hindu University, Varana ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-23-1995

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR1996All281

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Bhushan, Adv.

ORDER1. Petitioners are students of M.D./M.S. (Ayurved) in the faculty of Ayur-vedic Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, hereinafter referred to as the University. They by means of this petition under Art. 226 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 1967

Anandji Haridas and Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. S.P. Kushare, S.T.O. Nagpur and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-28-1967

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 8, 8A, 10(1), 10(3), 11A, 11A(1), 11(4), 11(5) and 22C(1); Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 14, 22(2) and 34(1); Business Profits Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 14; Finance Act, 1957; Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 12(5); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1968SC565; [1968]1SCR661; [1968]21STC326(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. H.R. Gokhale

CIVIL APPERLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeals Nos. 511-514 of 1966. Appeals, by special leave from the judgments and orders dated August 9, 1961, July 20, 1964, of the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench in Misc. Civil Applications...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2007

Jay Govind Yadav (Goala) Vs. Ahmed Tea Company (P) Ltd.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Oct-16-2007

Subject : CivilLimitation

B.P. Katakey, J.1. The defendant in Title Suit No. 78/2007, pending in the Court of the learned Munsiff, No. 2 at Dibrugarh, on the date fixed for cross-examination of PW-1 filed petition No. 2757/2005 on 16.11.2005...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 1993

Kalyanpur Lime and Cement Works Ltd. Vs. Labour Court and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jan-13-1993

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 2A

Advocate for Appellant : Ranjit Kumar and Shivajee Pandey, Advs.

Aftab Alam, J. 1. This application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed challenging an order dated November 7, 1981, passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Patna, in Reference...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 1952

Kanji Karsondas and ors. Vs. Nathubhai Khimji

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-03-1952

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 35, 75, 94 and 151 - Order 26, Rules 1 to 8 and 15 to 18 - Order 37, Rule 5; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules - Rule 372; Bombay City Civil Courts Rules - Rules 4(1) and 209; Bombay Pleaders Act, 1920 - Schedule III - Rule 6

Reported in : AIR1953Bom390; (1953)55BOMLR429; ILR1953Bom935

Advocate for Appellant : B.N. Gokhale, Adv.

Gajendragadkar, J.(1) The short point which arises in this revisional application is what is the meaning and denotation of the expression 'the expenses of the commission' used in O, 26, Rule 15. A suit for dissolution...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial