Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: george paracken · Page 1 of about 427 results (0.135 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 28 2002

Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors. Vs. Rajbir Singh

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-28-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Delhi Police (Promotion and Confirmation) Rules, 1980 - Rules 17 and 19; Punjab Police Rules, 1934 - Rules 13.1 and 13.8(2); Administrative Tribunals Act

Reported in : 2003(3)SLJ436(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : George Paracken, Adv

S.B. Sinha, C.J.1. Interpretation of Rule 19 (ii) of Delhi Police (Promotion & Confirmation) Rules, 1980 (hereinafter for the sake of brevity referred to as, 'the said Act') is in question in this writ petition, which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2002

Joint Commissioner of Police and ors. Vs. Sube Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-30-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Delhi Police Act, 1978 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 17(1), 18, 21 and 23; All India Services Act, 1951 - Sections 3(1); Indian Police Service (Fixation of Cadre Strength) Regulations, 1955; Delhi Police (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1980 - Rules 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 6 and 23(6); Customs Act, 1962; Central Excise Rules; Constitution of India - Article 311; Delhi Police (Appointment and Recruitment) Rules, 1980 - Rule 3(1); General Clauses Act - Sections 17, 18 and 19

Reported in : 2002VIIAD(Delhi)539; 99(2002)DLT37

Advocate for Appellant : Maninder Singh,; George Paracken and; V.K. Tandon, Advs

S.B. Sinha, C.J. 1. Whether Joint Commissioner of Police can be a disciplinary authority of the respondents of the writ petitions, is the question involved in this batch of writ petitions which arise out of judgment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2003

Commissioner of Police and ors. Vs. Om Kumar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-24-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 2004(73)DRJ172; 2004(3)SLJ272(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : George Paracken, Adv

D.K. Jain, J. 1. In this writ petition by the Union of India a challenge is laid to the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (for short the Tribunal) on 22...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 24 2014

Shiv Hari Agnihotri App/Hq/Northern Railway, New Delhi Vs. Union of In ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Feb-24-2014

Subject : Education

Oral. G. George Paracken, M (J). 1. Applicant was initially appointed as Assistant Public Prosecutor (APP for short) in Railway Protection Force (RPF for short) vide order No.2004/Sec(E)/PM-3/7 dated 15.3.2005 and joined on 25.03.2005. He was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 2013

Narayana Rao Battu Deputy Legislative Counsel New Delhi Vs. Union of I ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Oct-11-2013

Subject : Right to Information

G. George Paracken, J. 1. Applicants grievance in this Original Application is that his position in the seniority list of Deputy Legislative Counsel (“DLC” for short) has been altered to his disadvantage after several years, that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2009

V. Ramachandran Nair Retired Senior Loco Inspector Southern Railway, T ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Mar-23-2009

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant: T.C.G. Swamy, Advocate. For the Respondents: Thomas Mathew Nellimoottil, Advocate.

Hon'ble Mr. George Paracken, Judicial Member The applicant while working as a Senior Loco Inspector in Southern Railway retired voluntarily with effect from 30.11.2004. As a running staff, he was granted 30 % of his basic...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2009

N. Chandra Babu Vs. the Garrison Engineer (Air Force), Military Engine ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Jun-22-2009

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: Mr. P.K. Madhusoodhanan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. TPM Ibrahim Khan, SCGSC.

By Hon'ble Mr. George Paracken, Judicial Member In this OA applicant has sought a declaration that he is senior to the 5th respondent in the cadre of Pipe Fitter in the Area Seniority Unit of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 2009

P.H.Joy, Kottayam Vs. the Principal General Manager, Telecom,bsnl Bhav ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Nov-25-2009

Subject : Miscellaneous

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: Mr. P.K. Ibrahim, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. George Kuruvilla, Advocate.

HON'BLE MR. GEORGE PARACKEN, JUDICIAL MEMBER Before he joined service as Senior Superintendent in the office of the Regional Joint Labour Commissioner, Kozhikode on 3.6.1986, the Applicant had put in 7 years of service as Technician...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 2009

P.V. Babu, S/O. P.K. Vasu, Assistant Operator, National Institute of F ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Nov-19-2009

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: Mr. T.C. Govindaswamy, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. P.S. Biju, ACGSC.

By Hon'ble Mr. George Paracken, Judicial Member - According to the applicant he is the senior most among the Assistant Operators in the scale of pay of Rs. 4000-6000/- (pre-revised). He is aggrieved by the Annexure...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2014

Sanjaybhardwaj, New Delhi and Others Vs. Union of India to Be Represen ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Jan-02-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

G. George Paracken, Member (J). 1. According to the learned counsel for the Applicants, the present Original Application is identical to OA No. 181/2009 Shri K.S. Premkumar and Others Vs. Union of India and Others decided...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial