Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: geetha luthra · Page 1 of about 5 results (0.019 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 18 2021

Attorney General For India Vs. Satish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-18-2021

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : POOJA DHAR __

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1410 OF2021(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) No.925 OF2021 ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR INDIA .... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS SATISH AND ANOTHER .... RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1411...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2023

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-17-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : PRIYA PURI __

Reportable 2023 INSC920IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Civil) No.1011 of 2022 Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty & Anr. …Petitioners Versus Union of India …Respondent With Writ Petition (Civil) No.93 of 2023...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 1995

In Re: Champaran Sugar Co. Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-20-1995

Subject : Company

Reported in : [1998]91CompCas182(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Dhirendra Kumar, Adv., for Dr. B.C. Roy Pharmaceuticals Ltd., ;Sudhir Chandra, ;Tarun Agarwal and ;Geetha Luthra, Advs. for Hanuman Sugar and Industries Ltd., ;J.N. Tewari, Adv. for the company in liq

A.K. Banerji, J. 1. Vide the order dated June 28, 1993, the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction ('BIFR' in short) recommended the winding up of the company, Champaran Sugar Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 30 2003

D.N. Sood Vs. Ito

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-30-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]131TAXMAN304(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Geetha Luthra, for the assessed; Avdesh Singh and; Santosh

ORDERBy an order dated 10-4-2003 proceedings under sections 82 and 83 of Cr. P.C. were directed to be initiated against the petitioners and notices under section 446 Cr. P.C. were directed to be issued to their...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2010

Rakesh Dhawan Vs Commissioner of Police and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-06-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Geetha Luthra, Sr. Adv.

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2. To be referred to the reporter or not?3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest?1. Present petition was filed by the petitioner with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial