Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: geeta luthra · Page 1 of about 293 results (0.116 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 22 1998

Dr. Bir Singh Vs. All India Institute of Medical Sciences

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-22-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law

Reported in : 73(1998)DLT830; 1998(46)DRJ143

Advocate for Appellant : Geeta Luthra and; D.N. Goburdhun, Advs

M.K. Sharma, J.1. In the present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the action of the respondents for filling up 7 posts in the level of Additional Professor and Associate Professor through the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 2007

Dr. Prem Lata Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-09-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 10, 10(1), 10(1A), 10(2), 17B and 24B; Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 140(2007)DLT270

Advocate for Appellant : V.K. Rao, Adv

Kailash Gambhir, J.1. By way of this writ petition the petitioner is seeking directions against the respondents to appoint her as Member (Female), District Forum, Delhi pursuant to advertisement dated 06.04.2006. The facts of the case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 1996

Gurdip Singh Uban and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-17-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4; Constitution of India - Article 13

Reported in : 1997IAD(Delhi)100; 65(1997)DLT222; 1997RLR39

Advocate for Appellant : Rajneesh Vats,; Subhash Mittal,; Geeta Luthra and;

Mahinder Narain, J. (1) The petitioners Gurdip Singh, Mrs. Har Sharan Mishra and Mrs. Har Kiran have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution on. 23-4-1986, praying that the notifications for acquisition issued...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 22 1994

Potato and Onion Merchants Association Vs. Chairman, Delhi Agricultura ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-22-1994

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : 1994IIIAD(Delhi)1437; 56(1994)DLT547; 1994(30)DRJ657

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Anand,; Lavkesh Sawhney,; Geeta Luthra and;

Vijender Jain, J. (1) This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Sec.151 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying that the defendants be restrained from taking...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 1999

K.N. Sharma Vs. Chief General Manager, State Bank of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-02-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 85(2000)DLT269; 2000(54)DRJ777

Advocate for Appellant : Geeta Luthra, Adv

K. Ramamoorthy, J. 1. The petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: 'It is, thereforee, respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be graciously pleased to - (a) issue writ of mandamus and certiorari or any...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 2007

Sarbjyot Kaur Saluja and ors. Vs. Rajender Singh Saluja

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-20-2007

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 18, 20 and 23; Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - Sections 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rules 15 and 17 - Order 33, Rules 1, 2 and 5

Reported in : 148(2008)DLT650

Advocate for Appellant : Geeta Luthra, Adv

Anil Kumar, J. IA No. 3544/20071. The learned Counsel for the plaintiff/applicant states that another application under Order 6 Rule 17 has also been filed by the plaintiff and consequently she does not press the present...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 1997

Pominder Kumar Chhabra Vs. Asha Devi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-01-1997

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 25

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)846; 70(1997)DLT764; 1997(43)DRJ790

Advocate for Appellant : Geeta Luthra, Adv

Manmohan Sarin, J. (1) By this common order, I would be disposing of civil revision Nos. 406/97 and 527/97, filed by the petitioner/husband. The first revision is directed against order dated 2.1.1997, passed by the learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 1993

Aruna Madan Vs. Subhash Madan

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-15-1993

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 27

Reported in : 1994IAD(Delhi)189; 53(1994)DLT253; I(1994)DMC59; (1993)105PLR48

Advocate for Appellant : Geeta Luthra and; S. Bazaz, Advs

V.B. Bansal, J. (1) Smt. Aruna Madan has filed this revision petition against the order dated 20.10.1993 of Shri J.D. Kapoor, learned Additional DistrictJudge, Delhi, vide which he directed that an application under Section 27 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 1996

Asha Darshan Vs. Jai Dayal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-14-1996

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 24; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125

Reported in : 1996VAD(Delhi)577; 65(1997)DLT783; I(1997)DMC227; 1997(40)DRJ1

Advocate for Appellant : Geeta Luthra,; Rakesh Aggarwal and; M.R. Chawla, Advs

Usha Mehra, J.(1) Shri Jai Dayal filed a petition for annulment of marriage against the present petitioner Smt.Asha under Section 12(i)(b) read with Section 5(ii)(c) of the Hindu Marriage Act. In the said petition the present...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 1996

Debopam Bhowmick Vs. Alpana Bhowmick

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-27-1996

Subject : FamilyDirect Taxation

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 24; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 17(2)

Reported in : 65(1997)DLT1025; I(1997)DMC50

Advocate for Appellant : Geeta Luthra and; Aurobindo Ghosh, Advs

Usha Mehra, J.(1) $THE petitioner husband sought divorce against the respondent wife on the ground of cruelty and desertion. The respondent wife moved an application in that petition under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial