Advanced Search Results

Gajendra Singh and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Sections 54; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 145, 145(1), 145(5), 145(6), 146(1), 397, 397(3), 401 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 379, 427 and 447

Reported in : 1995CriLJ2133; 1995(3)WLC501; 1994(2)WLN643

Advocate for Appellant : T.S. Champawat, Adv.

ORDERR.R. Yadav, J.1. The present criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr. P. C. arises out of a judgment dated 23-4-1986 passed in Cr. Revision No. 19/86 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bali by means...

Munna Singh Vs. Director General C.i.S.F. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.K.Vijayan, Adv.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Perused the report of the Enquiry Officer as also the original record pertaining to the proceedings conducted by the Enquiry Officer. 3. On 26.7.2002, a charge-sheet was served...

Mohd. Umar Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Food AdulterationCriminal

Reported in : 1989WLN(UC)504

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A.K. Bhandari

N.C. Sharma, J.1. This is a revision by Mohammad Umar against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Baran dated August 9, 1982 passed in criminal appeal No. 164 of 1981 of his Court...

Trilok Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2002(3)WLN154

Sunil Kumar Garg, J.1. This appeal has been filed by the accused appellant against the judgment and order dated 11.12.1999 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Merta in Sessions Case No. 3/99, by which he convicted...

Ramagovind Singh Vs. Smt. Saleena Singh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Gajendra Singh Gaharwar

Ramagovind Singh versus Smt. Saleena Singh & Others Conc. No.1335 ”21. 2.2013: Shri Gajendra Singh Gaharwar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.M.Lal, learned counsel for respondents. Keeping in view the documents filed by the respondents...

Mamta Pathak Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Gajendra Singh

W.P.No.4864/2007 (Mamta Pathak versus State of MP and others ) 12.12.2012 Shri Gajendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.M.Lal, learned G.A.for the State. Shri K.S.Wadhwa, learned counsel for the respondent No.2. It is stated...

Ashok Lal Pao Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Gajendra Singh Gaharwar

W.A.No.701/2012 21.01.2013 Shri Gajendra Singh Gaharwar, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri Anoop Nair, learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 5. Shri Sanjay Agrawal, learned counsel for the respondent No.6. With the consent of learned counsel...

Muniprasad Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Gajendra Singh

W.P.No.16010/2012 (Muni prasad Tiwari & ORS.versus State of M.P.& ors.) 10.10.2012 Heard Shri Gajendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition alleging improper investigation by the...

Shyam Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : RLW2004(3)Raj1678; 2004(1)WLC93

Advocate for Appellant : Gajendra Singh, Adv.; R.L. Jangid, Addl. Adv. General

N.N. Mathur, J.1. The instant writ petition is offshoot of the pending Public Interest Litigation popularly known as Mahendra Lodha's case (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6073/93), wherein by order dated 20th December, 2000 wide ranging...

Brij Bahadur Upadhyaya Vs. the State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Gajendra Singh

W.P.No.2618/2004 23.08.2012 Shri Gajendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Ms.Nirmala Nayak, learned Govt. Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri Sohaib Khan, learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4. This Court has already directed listing of the...