Advanced Search Results

Vasant Abaji Mandke Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ConstitutionDirect Taxation

Reported in : (1979)81BOMLR542

Deshpande, J.1. Petitioners in this group of petitions are all legal practitioners two of them having enrolled as such practitioners after retirement from service. Under Section 3 of the Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings...

Ram Lal Vs. Laxmi Lal

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Civil

S.B. Civil First Appeal No.130/1989 Ram Lal Vs. Laxmi Lal Order, Wednesday, 02/12/2015. 1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :: ORDER :: S.B. Civil First Appeal No.130/1989 Ram Lal...

Sunil Kumar Vs. M/S Raj Vilas Palace Hotel P. Ltd. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Education

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.226/2014 Sunil Kumar versus Raj Vilas Palace Hotel PVT.LTD.& ORS.Date of Judgment :: 17.10.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.G.Vaishnav, for...

Mohammad Akil Khan Vs. Premraj Jawanmal Surana and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 9(1), 23 and 30; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 55(6)

Reported in : AIR1972Bom217; (1972)74BOMLR225; ILR1972Bom1040; 1972MhLJ483

Advocate for Appellant : F.G. Vaishnav, Adv.

Deshmukh, J.1. This appeal raises a question of some importance relating to the apportionment of compensation on compulsory acquisition of land between the intending vendor and the intending vendee whose contract has been frustrated by the...

Nagnathappa Vs. Shrinivas and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Inams and Cash Grants Act, 1954 - Sections 2(1) and 6(1); Hyderabad Tenancy Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1976Bom372; 1976MhLJ465

Advocate for Appellant : H.G. Vaishnav and ;Bhimrao N. Naik, Advs. ;in Spl. C.A. No. 344 of 1971 and S.J. Deshpande, Adv. and ;D.Y. Lovekar, Adv. ;in Spl. C.A. No. 548 of 1971

Hajarnavis, J. 1. These two petitions are directed against an appellate order passed by the Commissioner, Aurangabad, who partly allowed the appeal filed by the occupant of the suit lands viz. the petitioner in Special Civil...

Nagnath Tatya Halge Vs. Kishan Tatya Kale

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 14, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1972Bom228; (1972)74BOMLR141; 1972MhLJ334

Advocate for Appellant : H.G. Vaishnav and ;A.H. Vaishnav, Advs.

ORDER1. There is no substance in this revisional application on behalf of the original plaintiff from the order dated September 8, 1969, made by the trial Court, whereby findings were made in favour of the plaintiff...

Saraswati Printing Press Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax, Eastern Divisi ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Hyderabad Companies Act; Hyderabad General Sales Tax Act, 1950; Hyderabad General Sales Tax Rules, 1950 - Rule 5(3)

Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR607; [1959]10STC286(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : H.G. Vaishnav and ;K.B. Deshpande, Advs.

Vyas, J.1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner press, Messrs Saraswati Printing Press, wherein the petitioner has prayed for the setting aside of the order dated 7th...

Modern Threads (i) Ltd. Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporation

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(22)

Reported in : (2003)IIILLJ445Raj

Advocate for Appellant : G. Vaishnav, Adv.

Sunil Kumar Garg, J.1. The question of law is whether good-work wages paid to the respondent by the appellant in the present case are wages within the meaning of Section 2(22) of the Employees' State Insurance...

Dhulchand Vs. Kanti Lal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 2(19) and 110A; Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867 - Sections 1

Reported in : 2006ACJ276; AIR2004Raj267; RLW2004(4)Raj2291; 2004(3)WLC470

Advocate for Appellant : G. Vaishnav, Adv.

Prakash Tatia, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.2. This appeal is against the award dated 3rd Oct. 1987 by which the appellant, respondent No. 2 and respondent No. 3 were held liable to pay the...

Devilal and ors. Vs. Kishanlal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Acts : Rajasthan Pre-emption Act, 1966 - Sections 5, 8 and 16

Reported in : RLW2006(3)Raj2214; 2006(3)WLC61

Advocate for Appellant : G. Vaishnav, Adv.

Prakash Tatia, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. The appellants are aggrieved against the dismissal of the suit seeking decree for pre-emption by the trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 4.12.1978 and dismissal of...