Advanced Search Results
Telecom Employees Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Scheduled Cast ...
Karnataka
Aug-23-1990
Civil
Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 - Sections 14, 19(3), 37, 38 and 65; The Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1982; The Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Buildings under Self Financing Housing Scheme) Rules, 1982; The Bangalore Development Authority (Disposal of Corner Sites and Commercial Sites) Rules, 1984
ILR1990KAR3320
R. Krishna Murthy with Nanjudaswamy, ;U.L. Narayana Rao and ;Chandrasekhara Babu, Advs. and ;G.V. Shantharaju for Kesvy and Co.
S. Mohan, C.J.1. W.A.No. 1229/90. The facts leading to this appeal are as follows:(1) The first respondent Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Minority Communities and Backward Classes Improvement. Centre, Bangalore-26, (hereinafter referred to as the first-respondent-Society), filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUttar Pradesh State Bridge Construction Corporation Limited Vs. Bangal ...
Karnataka
Jun-22-2005
CivilContract
Companies Act, 1956; ;Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14 and 226; ;Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 4, 10 and 14;
2005(3)ARBLR254(Kar); 2005(2)CTLJ451(Kar); 2005(5)KarLJ112
G.V. Shantharaju, Sr. Adv. for M. Arun, Adv. of Kesvy and Company
V. Jagannathan, J.1. Legality of the termination of the contract entered into by the Bangalore Development Authority ('BDA' for short) with the Uttar Pradesh State Bridge Construction Corporation Limited ('appellant-Corporation' for short), which has been upheld...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs. Latha U. Kamath and ors. Vs. the Commissioner, Bangalore Developm ...
Karnataka
Jan-29-2003
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 48
ILR2003KAR1604
G.V. Shantharaju, Sr. Counsel for ;Swamy and Swamy Associates
Kumar Rajaratnam, J.1. By consent of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties, these Writ Appeals are taken up for final disposal.2. Since both the writ appeals arise out of the same acquisition and raise the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board, Represented by Chief Engineer ...
Karnataka
Dec-01-2006
Commercial
AIR2007Kant55; 2007(1)KarLJ131
G.V. Shantharaju, Adv. and Kesvy & Co.
V. Jagannathan, J.1. The appellant-Board herein is carrying on the business of supply of electricity in Andhra Pradesh and it calls in question the order passed on I.A. No. I by the trial court restraining the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTungabhadra Sugar Works Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Karnataka
Dec-22-1993
Sales Tax
Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 2(1), 5(3) and 12AA
ILR1994KAR283
G.V. Shantharaju, Adv.
R.V. Raveendran, J.1. The petitioner-company owns a factory manufacturing sugar at Shimoga and is a registered dealer under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). By this writ petition, the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Ugar Sugar Works Ltd. Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Ta ...
Karnataka
Jun-16-2004
Sales Tax
Karnataka Sales Act, 1957 - Sections 5(3)
ILR2004KAR3223; [2005]139STC413(Kar)
G.V. Shantharaju, Sr. Adv.
ORDERP. Vishwanatha Shetty, J.1. In this Revision Petition filed under Section 23(1) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the petitioner has called in question the correctness of the Order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSouth Indian Sugar Mills Association by Its Secretary, Sri K. Ranganat ...
Karnataka
Feb-13-2009
Constitution
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1) and 6; Constitution of India (Third Amendment) Act, 1954; Sugarcane Act, 1981 - Sections 42; Bihar Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1960; Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Articles 162, 246, 254 and 254(1)
ILR2009KAR2216; 2009(5)KarLJ302:2009(3)KCCR18242009(5)AIRKarR232:AIR2009NOC2878
Jayakumar S. Patil, Sr. Counsel for Jayakumar S. Patil Associates in Writ Petition No. 6385 of 2008 and ;G.V. Shantharaju, Sr. Counsel for Kesvy and Co. in Writ Petition No. 6809 of 2008
ORDERN. Kumar, J.1. The petitioners in these two Writ Petitions have challenged the order of the Government of Karnataka dated 31.3.2008 where the Commissioner for Cane Development and Director of Sugar in Karnataka has requested all...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Sathya Murthy Vs. the Secretary Ministry for Industry and Commerce ...
Karnataka
Jan-29-2007
Intellectual Property Rights
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1949 - Sections 5; Patents Act, 1970; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005
2007(4)KarLJ686; 2007(4)KCCRSN260; 2007(3)AIRKarR40.
K.N. Ravikumar, Adv.
ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. In response to the order and direction dated 3-11-2006 passed/issued by this Court calling upon the learned Assistant Solicitor General appearing for respondent No. 1 - Government of India to respond to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV. Gunda Reddy Vs. the Secretary Department of Revenue and ors.
Karnataka
Aug-01-2005
PropertyConstitution
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 16(2); Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1961 - Sections 3F, 4, 4(1), 6, 6(1), 9, 10, 11, 12(2), 16, 16(1), 16(2) and 39; Land Acquisition (Mysore Extension Amendment) Act, 1961 - Sections 16(1)(2); Gujarath Town planning and Urban Development Act, 1976; Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 79B and 109
ILR2005KAR5692
M.E. Prabhu, Adv.
ORDERV. Gopala Gowda, J.1. The petitioner in W.P. No. 33566/2004 is the owner of lands bearing Sy. Nos. 43/2 measuring 0-24 guntas, 44/1B measuring 1-00 acre and 46/2 measuring 1 acre 25 guntas. The petitioner in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Yuvarani Kempucheluvajammanniavaru Trust, Mysore Vs. Special Depu ...
Karnataka
Jul-15-1998
Property
Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2(1), 3 to 24 and 46; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Rules, 1976 - Rules 3 and 5; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 141; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections 7(2)
ILR1998KAR3293; 1998(6)KarLJ609
Smt. Nalini Chidambaram, Senior Adv., ;Sri C.K. Venkatesh and ;Sri R. Nagendra Nidu, Advs.
ORDER1. These writ petitions raise among others, one and common important question of law of interpretation and impact of Section 20 of Urban Land Ceiling Act and particularly the question in the context of the facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »