Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: g subramaniam · Page 1 of about 143 results (0.067 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 07 1995

V. Sasitharan and ors. Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-07-1995

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Administrative Tribunals Act, 1885 - Sections 3, 14, 19 and 28; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 28; All India Services (Death-Cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958 - Rule 16(1)

Reported in : (1996)ILLJ647Mad

Advocate for Appellant : G. Subramaniam, S.C. for ;V.S. Gnanadesigam, Advs.

ORDERAr. Lakshmanan, J.1. The petitioner in W.P. No. 19967 of 1994 is a practising advocate in this Court. According to him, the writ petition has been filed by him without any motive against the respondents and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2002

Sri Kasi Mutt, Educational Agency of Sri Kumaragurubara Swamigal Arts ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-23-2002

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 30, 30(1) and 162; Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1976

Reported in : (2002)2MLJ386

Advocate for Appellant : G. Subramaniam, Sr. Counsel for ;N. Paul Vasanthakumar, Adv.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment rendered in W.P.No.15624 of 1995 dated 14.11.1996. The writ petitioner who was unsuccessful in the writ petition is the appellant herein and the parties are hereinafter referred to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 1984

A. Venkataraman Vs. S. Rajalakshmi and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-05-1984

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14(1) and 14(2); Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 74 and 97

Reported in : AIR1985Mad248; (1985)1MLJ232

Advocate for Appellant : G. Subramaniam, Adv.

Mohan, J.1. The facts leading to these appeals are as follows : During the course of the judgment we will refer to the parties as plaintiffs and defendants as that would be convenient. The plaintiffs, who...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 01 1993

K. Ramaneeswari and anr. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Represented by It ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-01-1993

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1994)2MLJ353

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. G. Subramaniam

ORDERAR. Lakshmanan, J.1. The writ petition is for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the 1st respondent in G.O.Rt. No. 70, Revenue Department dated 25.1.1993 and quash the same.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 1996

Dharman and Six ors. Vs. Marimuthu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-02-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 6, Rule 4; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 16; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 104; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 122 and 126

Reported in : 1996(2)CTC279

Advocate for Appellant : G. Subramaniam, Sr. Counsel for ;Prabhakar, Adv.

ORDERD. Raju, J.1. Defendants 2 to 7 in O.S.No.338 of 1977 on the file of the Court of District Munsif, Ariyalur, who succeeded before the Trial Court, but lost before the First Appellate Court, are the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2003

Md. Zakir HussaIn Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-17-2003

Subject : Commercial

Acts : National Highway Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 3, 3F, 5, 30, and 30(2); National Highway Laws (Amendment) Act, 1997 - Sections 3A, 3D(2) and 4; National Highway Authority Act, 1988 - Sections 3D, 6, 7 and 11; Constitution of India; Gauhati Municipal Corporation Act, 1971 - Sections 141, 144 and 144(2)(C)

Advocate for Appellant : G. Subramaniam and A. Choudhury, Advs.

I.A. Ansari, J.1. In a federal set up like ours, conflicts between Parliamentary and State enactments are not really uncommon. How to resolve such conflicts is also, by and large, well settled ; but every time,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 1992

Sri Mahalakshmi Temple Vs. the Commissioner, H.R. and C.E. (Admn.) Dep ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-03-1992

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 - Sections 6(20), 45(1), 47, 49, 63 and 69

Reported in : AIR1993Mad25; (1993)IMLJ266

Advocate for Appellant : G. Subramaniam, for;W.C. Thiruvengadam, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition in his capacity as the Founder Managing Trustee of Sri Mahalakshmi Temple, Madras-90, for the following relief : To issue a writ of certiorari or any other...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 1999

M. Bernardsingh Vs. Syndicate Bank, Nagercoil Branch by It's Manager a ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-14-1999

Subject : ContractCivil

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 -- Sections 62, 134, 172 and 173 to 179; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Order 1, Rule 10(2); Stamp Act, 1899

Reported in : 2000(1)CTC314

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. G. Subramaniam, Senior Counsel, Adv.

ORDER1. The first defendant in O.S.No. 58 of 1992 on the file of the Sub-Court at Nagercoil is the appellant in this appeal. The plaintiff in that suit and defendants 2 to 4 therein are respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 1995

K.M. Madhavakrishnan Vs. S.R. Swami and Another

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-21-1995

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 19 and 62; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 and 96; Land Reforms Act - Sections 10(1); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 10 and 16

Reported in : AIR1995Mad318; (1995)IIMLJ127

Advocate for Appellant : G. Subramaniam, Sr. Counsel

ORDERA. R. Lakshmanan, J.1. This case has a chequered history. Both parties are in Court fighting their litigation tooth and nail from the year 1968 onwards. On the first round of litigation, the suit O.S. No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2001

Mettur Beardsell Limited, a Public Limited Company by Its Secretary, 4 ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-30-2001

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 34; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 5(1); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 62

Reported in : AIR2001Mad466; (2001)2MLJ432

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. G. Subramaniam, ;Senior Counsel for Mr. K. Venkateswara Rao, Adv.

ORDER1. First defendant in O.S.No.999 of 1984 on the file of Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem, aggrieved by the decree for Rs. 3,37,662.47 with interest thereon against all the defendants, preferred the above appeal before this Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial