Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: g sampath and · Page 1 of about 101 results (0.098 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 07 1998

BipIn Textile and Processing Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Aug-07-1998

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1999)(80)LC225Tri(Bang.)alore

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. G. Sampath

1. All these appeals arise out of the order in original dated 27.7.1990 by which the Collector of Central Excise has confirmed the duty demand of Rs. 3,39,239.59 on the fabrics both cotton and man-made processed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 1997

Gufic Chem Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Mar-19-1997

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1998)(104)ELT119Tri(Chennai)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. G. Sampath

1. The prayer in the stay application is for dispensation of pre-deposit of Rs. 11,00,409/- and a penalty of Rs. 5 lacs imposed on the appellants in terms of the impugned order. The duty amount has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 1997

Vibgyor Textiles Processors Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Jan-30-1997

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1997)(70)LC856Tri(Bang.)alore

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. G. Sampath

1. These stay petitions are filed praying that the pre-deposit of the duty amount in terms of the impugned orders be waived during the pendency of the appeal. The total duty demand involved in all the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 09 1997

Sipani Automobiles Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Jun-09-1997

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1998)(99)ELT677Tri(Chennai)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. G. Sampath

1. The prayer in the applications is for dispensation of pre-deposit of duty and penalties payable in terms of the impugned order as under :_________________________________________________________Applicants Amount of duty Amount of penalty_________________________________________________________4. D.K. Sipani nil 10,00,000_________________________________________________________ 2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 04 1996

Regency Printers Vs. Commissioner of C.E.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Nov-04-1996

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1997)(92)ELT654Tri(Chennai)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. G. Sampath

1. These appeals arise out of the same facts and are therefore taken up together for disposal by this common order. The facts of the case are that on scrutiny of the records, the department noticed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 1984

Madurai Adheena Peadathipathi Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-13-1984

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1984Mad241

Advocate for Appellant : S. Doraiswami, ;G. Sampath and ;Veerasekharan, Advs.;B. Kalyansundaram, ;S.S. Velayudham and ;Sam, Advs.

Ratnavel Pandian, J. 1. A telegram purported to have been sent by the Sri Madurai Adheena Peedathiapthi, addressed to the Honourable the Chief Justice of this High Court was admitted as a writ petition and Rule...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 1961

Manalal Rikhbaji and ors. Vs. Mohanlal Harilal Rathi and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-03-1961

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 20 - Order 49, Rule 3 - Order 7, Rule 10 and 10(1); Supreme Court Rules - Order 11, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1963Bom94; (1961)63BOMLR969

Advocate for Appellant : K.M. Vakil and ;Bhonkar, Advs.

1. This is a suit to enforce a mortgage dated June 19, 1952. The mortgage is an English mortgage. 2. At the instance of the parties, I directed that the first issue as regards jurisdiction of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1999

Collector of Central Excise Vs. B.P.L. Sanyo Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Mar-04-1999

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1999)(65)ECC668

1. This is a Revenue appeal against the Order-in-Appeal No. 68/89 (B), dated 21-3-1989 wherein video decks manufactured by the current respondents have been held classifiable under sub-heading 8522 of the Central Excise Tariff Act. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 2014

K. R. Chandra Paul Vs. the State of A.P Rep. by Inspector of Po

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-21-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO Criminal Appeal No.1665 of 2005 21-07-2014 K.R.Chandra Paul....Appellant The State of A.P Rep. by Inspector of Police, CBI Visakhapatnam.Respondent Counsel for Appellant : Sr.T. Pradyumna Kumar Reddy Counsel for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 1999

Tata Electronic Development Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Jan-05-1999

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2000)(89)LC377Tri(Bang.)alore

1. This appeal arises from Order-in-Original No. 116/87 dated 18.12.1987 passed by Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore confirming the confiscation of 141 Numbers of PCB assemblies valued at Rs. 6 lakhs under seizure, under Rule 52A/173Q...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial