Advanced Search Results

T.V. Satyanarayana Vs. Subba Aruna Meenakshi

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 19, 19(1), 19(4) and 115; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 24

Reported in : ILR1988KAR1074

Advocate for Appellant : G.S. Rao , Adv.

Rama Jois, J.1. In this matter, which is presented as an appeal against an order of the Family Court, Bangalore, granting interim maintenance to the respondent on an application presented under Section 24 of the Hindu...

Bangalore Timber Industries and others Vs. Madras Sapper Ex-servicemen ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 235, 235(1) and (2), 237, 433, 439, 444, 482, 582, 583 and 617; Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1) and 3(D)

Reported in : [1990]68CompCas641(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : Udaya Holla, Adv.;G.S. Rao, Adv.

ORDERP.P. Bopanna, J.1. This company petition is filed by the creditors of an unregistered company which is carrying on business under the name and style of madras Sapper Ex-Servicemen's Rehabilitaton Association. There are six petitioners and...

Annam Venkateswarlu Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 362, 369, 385, 386, 424, 430, 482 and 561A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 408 and 465

Reported in : 1998(2)ALD412; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)174

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. G.S. Rao, Adv.

ORDER1. This petition is fifed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code for being mentioned to recall the order dated 4-11-1997 in Crl.RCNo.408 of 1996.2. The facts in giving rise to the filing of this...

K.V.Ramana Rao Vs. Uoi Represented by Its : the Sr.Deputy General Mana ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Subject : Miscellaneous

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Applicant : G.S.Rao, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents : M.C.Jacob, SC for Rlys.

ORAL ORDER {As per Hon'ble Mr. R.Santhanam, Member (Admn.) } Heard Mr.G.S.Rao, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.M.C.Jacob, learned standing counsel for the respondents. 2. This application has been filed challenging the inquiry report of...

Smt. K. Suseela Vs. Uoi, Rep., By: the General Manager, South Central ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Subject : Property

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Applicant : G.S.Rao, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents : N.R. Devaraj, SC for Rlys.

ORAL ORDER : (As per Hon'ble Mr.Justice.P.Lakshmana Reddy, Vice Chairman) Heard Mr.G.Pavana Murthy representing Mr.G.S.Rao, the learned Counsel for the Applicant and Mr.N.R.Devaraj, the learned Standing Counsel for the Respondents. 2. The learned Counsel for the...

Umesh Kumar Ram Vs. the General Manager, South Central Railway, Secund ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Applicants : G.S. Rao, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents : Mrs. M. Venkateswari, SC for Railways.

(As per Hon'ble Mrs. Bharati Ray, Member (Judl.) This application has been filed seeking for a direction to the 3rd respondent to implement the transfer order No. O.O. No.17/2007 dated 09.01.2007 of CPO/SC and O.O. No....

Annie Koshy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 155(2), 156(3), 200 and 482

Reported in : 1998(1)ALD(Cri)415; 1998CriLJ2565; I(1998)DMC608

Advocate for Appellant : G.S. Rao, Adv.

ORDER1. This is an application filed under section 482, Cr.P.C. (hereinafter referred as Code) praying to quash the order, dated : 4-7-1997 passed by the XXII Metropolitan Magistrate (Mahila Court), Hyderabad in C.C.SR. No. 2859/97 forwarding...

K. Nageswararao Vs. the General Manager and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: G.S. Rao, Advocate. For the Respondents: M.C. Jacob, SC for Rlys.

(Order per Hon'ble Mr. R. Santhanam, Member (A)) 1. This application has been filed challenging the letter dated 28.6.2008 of the Respondent No.2 for recovery of Rs.2,21,431/- from the settlement dues of the applicant being over...

P.Jagannatham Vs. Uoi and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Applicant : G.S.Rao. Counsel for the Respondents : I.Koti Reddy, SC for Rlys.

ORAL ORDER : (As per Hon'ble Mr.Justice.P.Lakshmana Reddy, Vice Chairman) Heard Mr.G.S.Rao, the learned Counsel for the Applicant and Mr.I.Koti Reddy, the learned Standing Counsel for the Respondents. 2. This application is filed aggrieved of a...

K. Satyamma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Reptd. by Its

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. G.S. Rao

To set aside the impugned order dated 22.2.2006 and further direct the respondents to enter the name of the applicant in live register and re-engage as CL/substitutes as and when vacancies arises or in the existing...