Advanced Search Results
Oudh Sugar Mills Ltd., Hargaon Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Allahabad
Oct-12-1959
PropertyConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 49, 245 and 246; Uttar Pradesh Large Land Holdings Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 3(1), 5, 5(2), 7, 11 and 12; Tenancy Law; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 251 and 267
AIR1960All136
J. Swarup, ;G.S. Pathak, ;R.S. Pathak, ;Ram Shankar Pd., ;S.C. Khare and ;S.D. Agrawala, Advs.
V. Bhargava, J.1. I have had the benefit of reading the judgment proposed to be delivered by my brother J. Sahai, J., and I entirely agree with him on all the points dealt with by him...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDan Singh Bist Vs. Additional Collector, Bijnor and ors.
Allahabad
May-06-1959
PropertyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 114 and 151 - Order 47, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1960All152
G.S. Pathak and ;S.C. Khare, Advs.
ORDERB.R. James, J.1. Has the High Court the power to recall and correct an invalid or manifestly erroneous order passed by it in the exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, is the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskW.O. Holdsworth and ors. Vs. State of U.P. Through Commr. of Agricultu ...
Allahabad
Dec-06-1955
Civil
Constitution of India - Article 133(1); United Provinces Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1948 - Sections 24
AIR1956All392
G.S. Pathak and ;R.S. Pathak, Advs.
Mootham, C.J.1. This is an application under Article 133(1) of the Constitution for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court from a judgment of this Court dated 19-4-1955, answering adversely to the applicants a reference made...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kunwar Murli Manohar Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.
Allahabad
Oct-29-1956
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 245 and 254(1); Uttar Pradesh Sugar Cane Cess Act, 1956 - Sections 1(3), 3, 3(1), 3(3) and 9(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 2 and 9
AIR1957All159
G.S. Pathak and ;Shanti Bhushan, Advs.
Mootham, C.J.1. These are petitions in which the validity of a cess or tax imposed by the State Government on sugarcane entering the premises of sugar factories in the Uttar Pradesh is challenged.2. Section 29(2) of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ.K. Cotton Manufacturers Ltd., Kanpur Vs. J.N. Tewari and ors.
Allahabad
Aug-06-1958
Direct Taxation
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1), 12 and 15; Constitution of India - Article 226; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 19
AIR1959All639
G.S. Pathak and ;R.S. Pathak, Advs.
ORDERV.G. Oak, J. 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for the issue of writs in the nature of certiorari and mandamus. Messrs. J. K. Cotton Manufacturers Limited, Kanpur are the petitioners....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBrij Sunder Sharma Vs. Election Tribunal, Jaipur and ors.
Rajasthan
Aug-27-1956
Election
Constitution of India - Articles 141 and 226; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 33, 33(5), 35, 36, 36(4), 98 to 99, 99(1), 123, 124 and 141; People (Conduct of Elections and Election Petitions) Rules, 1951 - Rule 4; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 18
AIR1957Raj189
G.S. Pathak and; C.L. Agarwal, Advs.
ORDER1. This is an application by Shri Brij Sunder Sharma under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of certiorari, against the Election Tribunal, Jaipur, and 8 others, for. setting aside its order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCapco Ltd. Vs. the Sales Tax Officer and anr.
Allahabad
Apr-30-1959
Sales Tax
Constitution of India - Article 286(1); Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 39; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 188
AIR1960All62; [1958]9STC553(All)
R.S. Pathak and ;G.S. Pathak, Advs.
Mootham, C.J. 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. 2. The petitioner is a private limited company which has its head office in Calcutta and branches at various places in India, including...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJethmal Parasram Vs. Commr. of Income Tax, Delhi, East Punjab and Ajme ...
Allahabad
Nov-22-1954
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 4(1), 42 and 42(3)
AIR1955All176
G.S. Pathak, ;R.K.S. Toshniwal and ;R.S. Pathak, Advs.
Malik, C.J. 1. This is a reference under Section 66(1) Income tax Act but in view of certain decisions of the Supreme Court it is not necessary for us to give our reasons at any length.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ.K. Hosiery Factory Vs. Labour Appellate Tribunal of India and anr.
Allahabad
Feb-24-1956
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950 - Sections 22 and 23; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 25F; ;Constitution of India - Article 19(1); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908
AIR1956All498; (1956)IILLJ4All
G.S. Pathak, Adv.
ORDERDesai, J.1. This is an application by the J.K. Hosiery Factory a firm manufacturing hosiery in Kanpur, for a writ of certiorari to quash an order dated 26-8-1955 of the Labour Appellate Tribunal, Lucknow Bench, and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Young Lawyers Association Vs. The State of Kerala
Supreme Court of India
Sep-28-2018
Education
R. P. Gupta
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.373 OF2006Indian Young Lawyers Association & Ors. The State of Kerala & Ors. VERSUS …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, CJI (for himself...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »