Advanced Search Results

Krishna Swami Vs. Union of India and Anotherwithraj Kanwar V. Union of ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 22(1), 32, 93, 94, 124(4), 131, 136, 141, 142, 145(3), 217(1)(C) and 226; Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 - Sections 3(2) and 4(2); Judges (Enquiry) Rules, 1969 - Rules 6, 7, 9 and 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 114 and 151 - Order 47, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1993SC1407; JT1992(5)SC92; 1992(1)SCALE484; (1992)4SCC605; [1992]Supp1SCR53

Advocate for Appellant : G. Ramaswamy, Attorney Genral,; Kapil Sibal,; Shanti Bhishan

ORDERJ.S. Verma, J.1. Both these writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution were heard together and are disposed of by this common judgment since they involve for decision substantially the same points. In Writ Petition...

Arif U. Patel Vs. Joint Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of F ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 22, 22(4) and 22(5); Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act - Sections 11

Reported in : 1995CriLJ1935

Advocate for Appellant : G. Ramaswamy, ;Sr. Adv. for B. Kumar

Arunachalam, J.1. Petitioner Arif U. Patel, the detenu himself, has prayed for issue of a Habeas for his production before this Court, as that he could be set free after quashing the impugned order dated 28th...

Sub-committee of Judicial Accountability Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 54, 55, 61, 93, 100, 105, 107, 108, 109, 118, 119, 121, 122, 124, 192, 196, 212, 213, 217(1), 226, 227, 235, 262, 286, 317 and 363; Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 6, 39(2), 40, 41(2), 200 and 220; Parliamentary (Judges) Commission of Inquiry Act, 1988; Government of India Act, 1935; Central Provinces and Berar Motor Vehicles Rules, 1940 - Rule 63; Inquiry Act, 1968 - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1992SC320; JT1991(6)SC184; 1991(2)SCALE844; (1991)4SCC699; [1991]Supp2SCR1

Advocate for Appellant : G. Ramaswamy, Attorney General,; Altaf Ahmad, Addl. Solicitor General,;

ORDERB.C. Ray, J.These writ petitions raise certain constitutional issues of quite some importance bearing on the construction of Articles 121 and 124 of the Constitution of India and of the 'The Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968' even...

Ajantha Travels, Pondicherry Vs. State Transport Authority, Pondicherr ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 60, 60(1) and 60(3)

Reported in : AIR1983Mad365

Advocate for Appellant : G. Ramaswamy, Adv. for ;V.T. Gopalan and ;Radhagopalan, Advs.

ORDER1. This writ petition is filed to quash the order passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, the second respondent herein, on 17-7-1981 in MVA No. 12/81. The facts leading to the filing of the writ...

New India Sugar Mills Ltd. and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 166, 226, 254 and 301; State Law; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 18G; Bihar Molasses (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 18G

Advocate for Appellant : G. Ramaswamy, Y.V. Giri and S.J. Mukhopadhyay, Senior Advs., Ramesh Agarwal, H. Devrajan, J. Saran and R.N. Mukhopadhyay, Advs.Sunil Kumar (Addl. SCCG), Chakradhari S. Singh and Rajeev Prakash, Advs.

B.P. Singh, J. 1. The petitioners in this batch of writ petitions are Sugar Companies, which have challenged the constitutional validity of the Bihar Molasses control Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the State Act), mainly...

Major General I.P.S. Dewan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : [1995(70)FLR1070]; JT1995(2)SC654; 1995(2)SCALE182; (1995)3SCC383; [1995]2SCR532; 1995(3)SLJ135(SC); 1995(2)LC151(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : G. Ramaswamy,; D.N. Goburdhan,; Pinky Anand And;

B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appeal is preferred against an order of the Delhi High Court dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant at the stage of admission. The appellant, Major General IPS...

Bhankerpur Simbhaoli Beverages P. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Sarabhjit Singh an ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CompanyCivil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 169, 190, 195 and 284; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 20

Reported in : [1996]86CompCas842(P& H); (1995)109PLR662

Advocate for Appellant : G. Ramaswamy and; M.L. Sarin, Senior Advs. and; Alka

V.K. Jhanji, J.1. This shall dispose of Civil Revision No. 1109 of 1994 and also application under Order 39, rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying for...

Textile Processors' Association, through Its Jt. Secretary NitIn Thakk ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 136 and 226

Reported in : 1996IAD(SC)464; (1996)3GLR521; JT1996(1)SC210; (1996)1SCC772; [1996]1SCR155

Advocate for Appellant : G. Ramaswamy A.M. Singhvi,; Revathy Raghavan,; Sonia Hurra

ORDER1. Delay condoned. This Special Leave Petition filed by the Association seeks leave to file the appeal. The main grievance sought to be brought lo our notice by Shri G. Ramaswamy, learned senior counsel is that...

Nisar Ahmad and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 68C, 68D and 68F; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 100(4)

Reported in : 1994(4)SCALE300; 1994Supp(3)SCC460; [1994]Supp3SCR357

Advocate for Appellant : G. Ramaswamy, Adv. For Appellant Nos. 1-4 and; Soli J. Sorabjee and;

ORDER1.Leave granted. Application for intervention allowed. Heard Counsel for appellants and the respondents.2. The case has chequered history the facts of which have been traced by this Court in Rama Krishna Verma and Ors. v. State...

Suman and Etc. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and anr. Etc.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Madras High Court Appellate Side Rules - 0rder 1, Rules 4 and 7; Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug-offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum Grabbers Act, 1982 - Sections 2, 3, 11, 11(1) and 11(5); Constitution of India - Article 22; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Evidence Act, 1972 - Sections 25

Reported in : AIR1986Mad318

Advocate for Appellant : G. Ramaswami, Adv.

M.N. Chandurkar, C.J.1. Two questions of law have been framed by the Division Bench which according to the learned Judges required consideration by a Full Bench. The two questions are as follows :(1) Whether the failure...