Advanced Search Results

Md. Abbas Mohideen Vs. Government of India Rep. by Secretary to Govern ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Coast Guard Act, 1978 - Sections 16, 42, 51, 51(1), 51(1A), 53(1), 61(4), 66 and 119; Coast Guard (Amendment) Act, 2002; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311(2); Coast Guard (Discipline) Rules, 1983 - Rules 26, 63, 64 and 65

Reported in : (2008)IILLJ587Mad

Advocate for Appellant : G. Rajagopalan, SC for S. Thiruvenkataswamy, Adv.

ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. I have heard the arguments of Mr. G. Rajagopalan, learned Senior Counsel leading Mr. S. Thiruvenkataswamy, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr. P. Wilson, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India representing the...

Sony Pictures Releasing of India Ltd. Through Appu Kumar Singh, Author ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cinematograph Act, 1952 - Sections 5, 5B, 5B(2), 6(1), 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Andhra Pradesh Cinemas Regulation Act, 1955 - Sections 7 and 8; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 295A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2), 21, 25, 32, 38, 136 and 300A

Reported in : 2006(4)CTC193; (2006)3MLJ289

Advocate for Appellant : A.L. Somayaji, Sr. Counsel for ;R. Yashodhvaradhan, Adv.;K. Shanmugakani, Adv. (M.P. No.4 of 2006);C. Johnson, Adv. (M.P. No.5 of 2006), ;G. Rajagopalan, Sr. Counsel for G.N. Sridharan, Adv. (M.P. No.

ORDERPrabha Sridevan, J.1. We may search in vain, for a more haunting tragic hero than Satan in Milton's 'Paradise Lost', who rails at God,What though the field be lost?All is not lost, the unconquerable will,And study...

P.E. Ramakrishnan Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Agricultural Incom ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1955 -- Sections 23; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 65, 73(2) & 73(3); Tamil Nadu Revenue Recovery Act, 1864; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 -- Sections 11-AAAA

Reported in : 1999(1)CTC166; [2000]245ITR281(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. G. Rajagopalan, Adv.

ORDER1. The prayer in the above writ petition is to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to third respondent in Form No.1 under Section 8, namely, the Distraint Order in proceedings...

The Tamil Nadu Consumers Cooperative Federation Ltd. Vs. T.A. Jayalaks ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : PropertyCommercial

Acts : Land Acquisition Act; Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978 - Sections 9 to 11, 11(1), 11(3), 11(5), 12, 12(7), 24(1) and 33; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226 and 300A

Reported in : (2009)2MLJ53

Advocate for Appellant : G. Rajagopalan, Sr. Counsel for ;P. Anbarasan, Adv., ;Nageswara Rao, Sr. Counsel for ;V. Ramesh, Adv.

D. Murugesan, J.1. As the issues raised and argued in both the writ appeal and the writ petition are one and the same, they are taken up together for disposal by this common judgment. For convenience,...

M.D. Iqbal Basha and ors. Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Rep ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 18(1); ;Contract Labour Act - Section 10; ;Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 16 and 226

Advocate for Appellant : G. Rajagopalan, SC for; V. Babu, Adv.

ORDERT. Raja, J.1. The petitioners 1 to 27 filed the present writ petition seeking for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the order passed by the 3rd...

Dr. Subramanian Swamy Vs. Reserve Bank of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433

Reported in : [2001]104CompCas467(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T.R. Davesan, Government Adv. for Special Government Pleader;G. Rajagopalan, Adv. for ;K.K. Senthil, Adv.

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. This application is filed to implead the applicant as a party/respondent in C. P. No. 496 of 2000.2. The averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the application read as under...

R. Gandhi and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by the Ministry of La ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : ConstitutionMotor Vehicles

Acts : Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles into Local Areas Act, 1990 - Sections 3, 3(1), 12, 15A and 19; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226, 254, 255, 300A and 301 to 304; Central Act; Constitutional Law; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; Madras High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1965 - Rules 1A and 2(4); Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1988

Reported in : 1997(3)CTC255

Advocate for Appellant : R. Gandhi, ;K.M. Vijayan, Sr. Advs., ;K. Ravi, ;M. Palani, ;R. Janakiraman, ;M.S. Subramaniam, ;M. Sundar, ;G. Rajagopalan, ;V. Raghavachari, ;Mythili Srinivasan and ;R. Srinivas, Advs.

ORDERJanarthanam, J.1. All these actions-this Batch of Writ Petitions-filed by Importers-Dealers or otherwise - of motor vehicles into local area from any 1997/3/17 place outside the State of Tamil Nadu for use or sale herein- owning...

V. Krishnamurthy, Proprietor, Meena Advertisers Vs. Airports Authority ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2004(1)CTLJ606(Mad); (2004)2MLJ314

Advocate for Appellant : G. Rajagopalan, Sr. Adv. ; for P. Rose Kamalam, Adv.

A. Kulasekaran, J.1. The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition praying for a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the Notice Inviting Tender for licensing indoor and outdoor advertisement...

Kalia Pillai (Died) and ors. Vs. Kathayee Ammal Dharmam (Charities) Re ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 - Sections 3(3), 6(13), 6(16), 6(17), 10 and 109

Reported in : (2003)3MLJ122

Advocate for Appellant : G. Rajagopalan, Adv. for ;S. Chandrasekaran and P. Rose Kamalam in L.P.A. Nos. 107 and 108 of 1999 and ;S. Parthasarathy, Adv. for Sarvabhauman Associates in L.P.A. No. 34/2000

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. These three appeals are the typical examples of the case as to how the properties endowed for charities by charitably inclined persons are misused and resisted by suitors raising indefensible pleas when suit...

Trichy Prime Tannery, a Partnership Firm Rep. by Its Managing Partner ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2005)1MLJ342

Advocate for Appellant : G. Rajagopalan, Sr. Counsel for G.R. Associates

ORDERMarkandey Katju, C.J.1. This common order shall dispose off all the above five writ petitions as the issue involved therein is identical.2. Petitioners in these writ petitions are engaged in the business of tannery and their...