Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: g r mudholkar · Page 1 of about 14 results (0.088 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 02 1959

Sawatram Ramprasad Mills Company Ltd. Vs. Kundanmal Sardarmal Jain

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-02-1959

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2

Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR1511; (1960)ILLJ63Bom

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mudholkar, Mr. G. R. Mudholkar

Tambe, J. 1. This is a petition under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India in which the petitioner the Sawatram Ramprasad Mills Company, Ltd., Akola, seeks to get quashed order dated 7 May,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 1959

Narayan Bansi Vs. Ratanlal Jankilal

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-01-1959

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1960)62BOMLR236

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. G.R. Mudholkar

Tambe, J. 1. Petitioner Narayan and Ratanlal, respondant No. 1 hereto, were the two contesting candidates at the general election of the Amravati Town Muncipal Committee in Vidarbha. They were contesting for a seat from ward...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 1960

Anant Vishnu Khare Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-18-1960

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1961)63BOMLR371

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M. R. Bobde

Tambe, J.1. Petitioners Anant Vishnu Khare and Ramchandra Brijlal have filed this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India wherein they pray for issuance of a writ of certiorari or such other...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 19 1958

W.W. Joshi and ors. Vs. State of Bombay and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-19-1958

Subject : Service

Acts : State Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 59(2), 87, 88, 116 and 116(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 124, 218, 226, 227, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 324; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 20; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Sections 9; Bengal Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1944; Indian Independence (Rights, Property and Liabilities) Order, 1947 - Article 10

Reported in : AIR1959Bom363; (1959)61BOMLR829; ILR1959Bom1267

Advocate for Appellant : M.R. Bobde, ;G.J. Ghate and ;B.B. Ranade, Advs.

Tambe, J. 1. An important question of law arises out of a preliminary objection raised in behalf of the State of Bombay. The preliminary objection raised relates to the maintainability of the petition against the present...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 1958

Joshi W.W. Vs. State of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-19-1958

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : State Reorganization Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 8, 59(2), 87, 88, 116 and 116(1); Constitution of India - Articles 124, 218, 248, 226, 227, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 324; Indian Independence (Rights, Property and Liabilities) Order, 1947 - Article 10; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Sections 9; Bengal Agricultural Incometax Act, 1944; Indian Independence (Legal Proceedings) Order, 1947

Reported in : (1959)IILLJ485Bom

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. M. R. Bobde

Tambe, J.1. An important question of law arises out of a preliminary objection raised on behalf of the State of Bombay. The preliminary objection raised relates to the maintainability of the petition against the present State...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 14 1958

Ramchandra Vs. Laxman

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-14-1958

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47 - Order 33, Rules 10 and 13

Reported in : AIR1959Bom49; (1958)60BOMLR1164; ILR1959Bom134

Advocate for Appellant : G.R. Mudholkar, Adv.

K.G. Datar, J.1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff under the Letters Patent from the judgment of Mr. Justice Bhutt delivered in School Appeal No. 91 of 1948. A few facts may be stated before...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 1957

Gajadhar Hiralal Vs. the Municipal Committee, Basim

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-24-1957

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 276, 276(2), 277 and 286; Government of India Act - 1935 - Sections 142-A and 142-A(2); Central Provinces and Berar Municipalities Act, 1922 - Sections 66(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 113

Reported in : AIR1958Bom378; (1958)60BOMLR419; ILR1958Bom625

Advocate for Appellant : G.R. Mudholkar, Adv.

Vyas, J.1. This is a reference made by the learned Second Civil Judge. Washim, under Section 113 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in Civil Suit No. 77-B of 1955 pending in the court of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 1963

State of Maharashtra Vs. Syndicate Transport Co. (P) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-26-1963

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 2, 11, 403, 406 and 420; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3 and 3(42); Indian Companies Act, 1917; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 386 and 388; Defence (General) Regulations, 1939; Interpretation Act, 1889 - Sections 2; Calcutta Municipal Act - Sections 407; Criminal Law

Reported in : AIR1964Bom195; (1964)66BOMLR197; 1964CriLJ276; 1964MhLJ308

Advocate for Appellant : G.R. Mudholkar, Addl. Govt. Pleader

ORDER1. This criminal reference raises an important question of law regarding the liability of a corporate body for indictment on a criminal charge involving the question of mens rea.2. The opponent No. 1, Messrs. Syndicate Transport...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 1962

State of Maharashtra Vs. Tanba Sadashio Kunbi

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-14-1962

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 441, 442, 448 and 506

Reported in : AIR1964Bom82; (1963)65BOMLR477; 1964CriLJ395; ILR1963Bom627

Advocate for Appellant : G.R. Mudholkar, Addl. Govt. Pleader

ORDER1. The Sessions Judge, Wardha, has recommended by this reference that the conviction of the non-applicant Tanba under Section 448 I. P. C. should be quashed. It is not possible to accept thisreference.2. The facts leading...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 1961

State Vs. Ganpat and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-22-1961

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898, - Sections 213 and 215, 347 and 439

Reported in : AIR1962Bom165; (1961)63BOMLR983; ILR1961Bom1001

Advocate for Appellant : G.R. Mudholkar, Asst. Special Govt. Pleader

ORDER(1) This is a reference by Mr. P.S. Malvankar, Sessions Judge, Akola, recommending that the order of commitment made by the Civil Judge and judicial Magistrate, First Class, Murtizapur, Mr. A.S. Korane, should be quashed and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial