Advanced Search Results
Rangappa Kelavadeppa Vs. Rindawa and Vasangouda
Mumbai
Jan-08-1953
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11, 47, 47(1) and 47(3) - Order 21, Rule 11 - Order 22, Rule 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1877 - Sections 13; Probate and Administration Act, 1881
AIR1954Bom139; (1953)55BOMLR725; ILR1953Bom991
G.P. Murdeshwar, Adv.
Bavdekar, J.1. This is a second appeal arising from a suit filed by one Rangappa, who claims to be the adopted son of one Kelvadeppa. It appears that this Kelvadeppa had obtained a decree against Venkappa,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarayan Vs. Padmanabh
Mumbai
Nov-25-1949
Family
Hindu Law
AIR1950Bom319; (1950)52BOMLR313
G.P. Murdeshwar, Adv.
Chagla, C.J.1. One Vishweshwar who died in 1928 made a will prior thereto dated 17th January 1926. By this will he gave a life-estate to his wife, defendant 1, and gave the absolute interest to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovind Waman Vs. Murlidhar Shrinivas and ors.
Mumbai
Nov-27-1952
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100 and 462 - Order 23, Rule 3 - Order 32, Rule 7; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 10; Dekkhan Agriculturists Relief Act - Sections 15B; Hereditary Offices Act, 1874 - Sections 5
AIR1953Bom412; (1953)55BOMLR465; ILR1953Bom948
G.P. Murdeshwar, Adv.
Gajendragadkak, J.1. The short question of law which this appeal raises for our decision is whether a compromise decree which contains a term contrary to the provisions of Section 10, T. P. Act is a nullity...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Nagesh Pundalik Vs. Manjayya Krishna and anr.
Mumbai
Jul-30-1952
Commercial
Debts Laws; Bombay Agricultual Debtors Relief Act, 1947 - Sections 2(5); Hindu Law; Hindu Gains of Learning Act
AIR1953Bom197; (1953)55BOMLR72; ILR1953Bom428
G.P. Murdeshwar, Adv.
ORDER[1] Applications were made by creditors against the petitioner and his two brothers. The trial Court held that the petitioner and his two brothers constituted a joint and undivided Hindu family and the family was not...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Dharwar Bank Ltd. Vs. Vasudeorao Madhavrao Deshpande
Mumbai
Aug-01-1952
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 12 and 12(2) - Schedule - Article 179; High Court Rules; High Court Orders; Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules - Rule 187; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 45, Rule 2
AIR1954Bom525; (1954)56BOMLR907; ILR1954Bom1266
G.P. Murdeshwar, Adv.
Rajadhyaksha, J. 1. These are four applications for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. They arise out of the decisions of this Court in certain Letters Patent Appeals, namely, 45, 46, 47 and 48 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadhavdas Devidas and ors. Vs. Vithaldas Vasudeodas and ors.
Mumbai
Aug-09-1951
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 39, 39(1) and 39(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100, 102, 104, 104(1), 104(2), 109 and 111; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1877 - Sections 588; Constitution of India - Article 133(1) and 133(3)
AIR1952Bom229; (1952)54BOMLR94; ILR1952Bom570
G.P. Murdeshwar Adv.
Bavdekar, J. [1] This is an appeal from a decision of Shah J., on appeal from an order refusing to sat aside an award. It is necessary to stale the facts, because a preliminary point has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevakka Fakirraddi Konnaraddiyavar and anr. Vs. Giraddi Ramaraddi Konn ...
Mumbai
Aug-25-1955
Family
Hindu Law; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rules 1, 2 and 16; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 and 103
AIR1956Bom99
G.P. Murdeshwar, Adv.
Dixit, J.1. The only question argued in this appeal is whether defendant 1 is the adopted son of one Fakirraddi Bhimaraddi. The facts giving rise to the suit from which this appeal arises may be shortly...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGanesh Subraya and ors. Vs. Hanmant Vithoba and ors.
Mumbai
Mar-05-1951
Property
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 108; Bombay Tenancy Act, 1939 - Sections 24
AIR1952Bom100; (1951)53BOMLR800
G.P. Murdeshwar, Adv.
Rajadhyaksha, J.1. This second appeal raises an interesting question about the right of a mulgenidar to cut the trees growing upon the land leased to him under a mulgeni lease. The facts ot the case are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.B. D'monte Vs. Bandra Borough Municipality
Mumbai
Apr-11-1950
Criminal
Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 110 and 111; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1903 - Sections 115; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 435
AIR1950Bom397; (1950)52BOMLR537
V.B. Rege, Adv. in No. 1163 of 1949, ;G.P. Murdeshwar, Adv. for in No. 1217 of 1949, ;C.K. Shah, Adv. and Wadia Gandhy & Co., in Nos. 1218, 1219 and 1220 of 1949;B.G. Thakor, Addl. Asst. Governmen
Chagla, C.J.1. The question that arises for the determination of this Full Bench is whether an application in revision made against an order of a Magistrate under Section 110, Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, XVIII [18] of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFakiraya Viraya Mathapati and ors. Vs. Achappanaik Bhimappanaik Desai ...
Mumbai
Dec-01-1955
PropertyLimitation
Limitation Act, 1908; Debt Law; Bombay Agricultural Debtors Relief Act, 1947 - Sections 52; Bombay Agricultural Debtors Relief (Amendment) Act, 1948
AIR1956Bom600
G.P. Murdeshwar, Adv.
Bavdekar, J.1. The two appellants and their uncle one Gangayya had obtained a mortgage decree against respondents 1 to 8. The amount of the decree was payable by instalments and the first Instalment was payable on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »