Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: g p · Page 1 of about 16,838 results (0.792 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 11 2011

Kashinath Shivba Khillare Vs. Fuley Magasvarg Vikas Mahamandal

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-11-2011

Subject : Service

Acts : Employment Service Rules 1983 - Rule 15

1]Heard Mrs. Deshpande for petitioner, advocate Marathe for respondent no.1, advocate Rahul Dhande for respondent no.3 & 4 and learned A.G.P. Shri Sonak for respondent no.2. Nobody appears for respondent no.5. 2] Short grievance of advocate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2006

Prabhakar S. Thakur Vs. Mahrashtra Housing and Area Development Author ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-07-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 - Sections 19, 19(1), 19(5), 20, 20(3), 20(5), 22(8), 22, 22B, 22C, 22C(7), 22C(8), 22D and 22E; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Evidence Act, 1872; Pension Rules

Reported in : 2006(4)BomCR305; (2006)IIILLJ187Bom; 2006(4)MhLj685

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Jakhade, Adv.

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. By this Appeal, the Appellant is challenging the judgment and order dated 17.12.2004 passed by the learned Single Judge, allowing the Writ Petition filed by Respondent No. 1 State of Maharashtra and Respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 10 1996

Yogiraj Kishanrao Since Dead by Lrs. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-10-1996

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 12, 16 and 33

Reported in : 1997(4)ALLMR106; 1997(2)BomCR226; (1996)98BOMLR600

Advocate for Appellant : S.G. Deshmukh, Adv.

R.G. Deshpande, J.1. By the present petition, the petitioners are challenging the order, dated 22-1-1985, passed by the Member, Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Aurangabad, in Revenue Appeal No. 89/A-84-Beed, whereby the learned Member of the Maharashtra Revenue...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 22 1986

Mohant Dharam Das Chela Karam Parkash Vs. Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandha ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-22-1986

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Sikh Gurdwaras Act, 1925 - Sections 7(1), 7(3), 7(4), 8, 12 and 14

Reported in : AIR1987P& H64

D.S. Tewatia, J.1. The State Government on receiving a petition under S.7(1) of the Sikh Gurdwaras Act, 1925, hereinafter referred to as the Act, seeking a declaration that the institution known as 'Gurdwara Sahib Padshahi Naumi,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 2011

Subhash S/O Babulal Rajput Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Sep-09-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Section 4,

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V.R. Mundada, Adv.

1. Heard Learned Counsel for the revision applicant and learned A.G.P. for respondent No.1. Though respondent No.2 - Acquiring Body served, none appears for it. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2007

State of Haryana and anr. Vs. Saroj Bala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-17-2007

Subject : Service

Reported in : AIR2007SC2486; 2007(2)SCALE246; 2007AIRSCW4427; 2007LawHerald(SC)549

Advocate for Appellant : Manjit Singh, A.A.G.,; P.N. Mishra, Sr. Adv.,; Harikesh Sing

G.P. Mathur, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal, by special leave, has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated July 18, 2005 of High Court of Punjab and Haryana, by which the writ petition filed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2000

Ajoy Kumar Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : May-08-2000

Subject : Criminal

S.K. Katriar, J.1. This Court at the very outset records its displeasure against the approach of the learned Counselfor the Reserve Bank of India and the State Bank of India in this matter which was evident...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 2011

Ranjeet Kumar Jha Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-19-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 201; Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. G.P. Jaiswal, Adv.

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH) Having heard Shri G.P. Jaiswal, learned Senior Counsel, amicus curiae, at our request in support of the appeal and Shri Ashwani Kumar Sinha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, we propose...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 1990

Triloki Nath Pandey and Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-30-1990

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(1), 134-A, 226, 309, 310 and 311; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2 and 24; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2 and 2(7) - Order XXVII, Rules 4 and 8-B; Uttar Pradesh Fundamental Rules - Rules 1, 2, 99, 103 and 162; Uttar Pradesh Fundamental Act - Sections 7 and 9; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 7-B, 241 and 241(2); Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules - Rule 114

Reported in : AIR1990All143; (1990)1UPLBEC542

Advocate for Appellant : G.P. Mathur, Adv.

ORDERV. N. Khare, J.1. Since common questions of fact and law in this writ petition and in the connected writ petitions are involved, we propose to decide these writ petitions by a common judgment.2. The petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 18 1996

Naku Lama Bhutia Vs. State of Sikkim

Court : Sikkim

Decided on : Jun-18-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : India Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 222, 302 and 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 428, 432, 433, 433A and 484(2)

Reported in : 1997CriLJ2782

Advocate for Appellant : G.P. Roy, Amicus Curiae

Malay Sengupta, Actg. C.J.1. Though it has been registered as an Appeal, it starts with a representation sent by a convict from the jail for remission of his sentence.2. While admitting the appeal we called for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial