Advanced Search Results
Subraya Ram Bhatta Vs. Pyara Krishna Gauda and anr.
Mumbai
Sep-22-1955
Tenancy
Tenancy Law; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 2(15), 6, 6(1), 6(2), 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 12(1), 13, 18, 70, 85 and 85(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Rules - Rules 7, 8 and 9
AIR1956Bom691; (1956)58BOMLR101; ILR1956Bom223
G.N. Vaidya, Adv.
ORDER1. The plaintiff's suit to recover Rs. 186-8-0 from his tenants as arrears of rent for the years 1950-51 and 1951-52 has been dismissed by the learned trial Judge on the ground that the Civil Court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Anglo French Drug Co., (Eastern) Private Ltd. Vs. R.D. Tinaikar
Mumbai
Feb-13-1957
Intellectual Property Rights
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3, Rule 1 - Order 3, Rules 1 and 2; Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Sections 3, 15(4), 70, 76, 76(1) and 80; Bombay Pleaders Act, 1920 - Sections 2, 2(2) and 9; The Bar Councils Act; Bengal Tenancy Act, 1869 - Sections 188; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 102 and 102(2)
AIR1959Bom21; (1957)59BOMLR1019
G.N. Vaidya, Adv.
1. This is an appeal from a decision of the Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks under Section 76 of the Trade Marks Act, 1940. The appeal raises a very interesting question as regards the right of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVithoba Nilo Vs. Bhagirathi Babu and ors.
Mumbai
Nov-28-1952
Commercial
Debt Law; Bombay Agricultural Debtors Relief Act, 1947 - Sections 32 and 32(5)
AIR1953Bom269; (1953)55BOMLR329; ILR1953Bom784
G.N. Vaidya, Adv.
Chagla, C.J.(1) A very interesting question under the Bombay Agricultural Debtors Relief Act arises on this revision application. The opponents applied under the Bombay Agricul-tural Debtors Relief Act to have the debt of the petitioner adjusted....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mansinh Surajsinh Vs. Jamnadas and Bros. and ors.
Mumbai
Nov-12-1962
Contract
AIR1964Bom49; (1963)65BOMLR484; ILR1963Bom623
G.N. Vaidya, Adv.
1. One Raghuvirsinh, Chieftain of Kathi Estate, and opponent No, 7 in these applications filed a suit on 23rd April 1960 for recovery of arrears of royalty from opponents 1 to 6 under a forest contract...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKanayalal Hinlal Agarwal and anr. Vs. Talabsha Maghbulsha Musalman and ...
Mumbai
Dec-10-1962
CivilLimitation
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 48 and 68; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1956 - Sections 68, 69, 70, 71 and 72; Bombay Agricultural Debtors Relief Act - Sections 19
AIR1964Bom157; (1963)65BOMLR452; ILR1963Bom139
G.N. Vaidya, Adv.
1. A somewhat interesting question has been raised in this appeal which arises out of an application for execution of a money decree presented more than 12 years after the date of the decree. On 24th...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadhya Pradesh State Co-operative Bank Ltd., Jabalpur Vs. P.D. Dalal
Mumbai
Nov-30-1964
Contract
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 201
AIR1967Bom279; (1966)68BOMLR500
G.N. Vaidya, Adv.
(1) This is an appeal by way of a Judges' Summons taken out by Madhya Pradesh State Co-operative Bank Ltd. (Hereinafter referred to as 'the Co-operative Bank') against the Official Liquidator as Liquidator of the Laxmi...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDinkar Tukaram Gajare Vs. Premchand Uttamchand Pagariya and ors.
Mumbai
Oct-28-1964
Trusts and Societies
Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 2(13) and 75; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rule 22
AIR1965Bom191; (1965)67BOMLR197; ILR1965Bom379; 1965MhLJ343
G.N. Vaidya and ;R.M. Purandare, Advs.
Tambe, J. (1) By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to get quashed the order made by the Maharashtra State Co-operative Tribunal, 6th respondent hereto, on 22-4-1964, setting aside...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChampalal Lakhichand Vs. Rupchand Supadu Patil and ors.
Mumbai
Jul-27-1967
CommercialLimitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 20; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 1
AIR1968Bom363; (1968)70BOMLR151; 1968MhLJ352
P.J. Vaidya, Adv. for ;G.N. Vaidya, Adv.
1. This is a second appeal by the decree-holder against the appellate order dated July 29, 1962, made by the District Judge, Jalgaon, in Civil Appeal No. 145 of 1962, whereby the learned Judge allowed the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUdhav Shankar Gangawane and ors. Vs. Tarabai and ors.
Mumbai
Aug-03-1967
FamilyProperty
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14(2); Hindu Law - Sections 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908
AIR1968Bom308; (1967)69BOMLR795; 1968MhLJ87
G.N. Vaidya, Adv.
(1) This second appeal raises a question of interpretation of section 14(2) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. (2) Sakharam and Sitabai were the father and mother respectively of Govind and Shankar. Sakharam died in 1945...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubraya Vardappa Hegde Vs. Gopal Krishna Vishweshwar Shastri and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-11-1956
Tenancy
Tenancy Law; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 4, 14(1), 27(1), 29, 29(1) and 29(2); Constitution of India - Article 227; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 143; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 111
AIR1959Bom13; (1957)59BOMLR62
G.N. Vaidya, Adv.
Bavdekar, J. 1. This is an application for revision arising from an application made by the applicant-landlord for possession of lands from the tenant Opponent No.1 on the ground that he had during a period of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »